全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

操纵证券市场民事责任的因果关系认定
The Determination of Causality in Civil Liability in the Securities Market Manipulation

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.104232, PP. 303-309

Keywords: 操纵证券市场,交易因果关系,损失因果关系,相当因果关系,推定因果关系
Manipulating Securities Market
, Transaction Causality, Loss Causality, Considerable Causal Relationship, Presumptive Causal Relationship

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

由于缺乏相应法律规范和制度构建,加之理论界尚未形成通说,因果关系认定在操纵证券市场民事责任案件的司法实践中存在较多疑难问题,使得认定操纵证券市场民事侵权责任存在较大困难。明确因果关系的认定方式,对于追究操纵者民事赔偿责任、保护投资者权益而言具有现实意义。本文将围绕操纵证券市场民事责任案件中因果关系的内部结构和判断标准展开讨论,试明确该类案件中因果关系的认定路径,阐释在交易因果关系和损失因果关系结构基础上采取相当因果关系和推定因果关系判断标准的合理性。
Due to the lack of corresponding legal norms and institutional construction, coupled with the lack of a consensus in the theoretical community, there are many difficult problems in the judicial practice of determining causal relationships in civil liability cases of manipulating the securities market, making it difficult to determine civil tort liability for manipulating the securities market. Clarifying the method of determining causal relationships is of practical significance for investigating the civil compensation liability of manipulators and protecting the rights and interests of investors. This article will discuss the internal structure and judgment standards of causal relationships in civil liability cases involving manipulation of the securities market, aiming to clarify the identification path of causal relationships in such cases and explain the rationality of adopting considerable causal relationships and presumptive causal relationships judgment standards based on the structure of transaction causal relationships and loss causal relationships.

References

[1]  王利民. 我国证券法中民事责任制度的完善[J]. 法学研究, 2001(4): 55-69.
[2]  韩世远. 论合同责任成立上的因果关系[J]. 法律科学, 1998(6): 50-57.
[3]  左传卫. 质疑侵权法中因果关系的二分法[J]. 法学, 2007(4): 82-88.
[4]  张新宝, 张小义. 英美侵权法中的因果关系——法律传统和法律政策视角下的考察[J]. 私法, 2013(1): 195-228.
[5]  廖升. 操纵证券市场侵权责任之因果关系[J]. 法学评论, 2017(1): 109-120.
[6]  杨立新. 侵权责任法[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2010: 104.
[7]  罗恬漩, 李纪超. 操纵证券市场纠纷司法困境及程序解读[J]. 中国证券期货, 2022(4): 80-89.
[8]  贾纬. 操纵市场行为的认定及其民事责任[J]. 人民司法, 2007(17): 2-15.
[9]  林晓镍, 朱颖琦, 李瑶菲. 操纵新三板证券市场行为民事赔偿的司法认定——定向增发投资者诉上海阿波罗机械股份有限公司、邵某等操纵证券交易市场责任纠纷案评析[J]. 证券法苑, 2022, 37(3): 179-195.
[10]  杨峰. 操纵证券市场民事责任因果关系认定规则之完善——从对美国、日本相关规定的比较出发[J]. 法商研究, 2006(6): 112-119.
[11]  马思祺. 操纵市场民事侵权责任认定的因果关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2021.
[12]  缪因知. 操纵证券市场民事责任的适用疑难与制度缓进[J]. 当代法学, 2020(4): 126-137.
[13]  程啸. 论操纵市场行为及其民事赔偿责任[J]. 法律科学, 2001(4): 91-104.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133