|
行政处罚中“一事”行为认定——以交通运输领域为探讨
|
Abstract:
我国《行政处罚法》确立了“一事不二罚”的原则,经过后续的补充和完善,一事不二罚原则已然成为行政执法中所应当遵循的原则。然而“一事”的认定是真正贯彻“一事不二罚”原则的重要前提,然而在当前的法律规定以及实务领域中并没有提出一套明确的认定“一事”标准。结合交通运输领域动态持续性的特点,讨论交通运输执法中一次行为、连续行为、继续行为的认定,并针对交通运输领域特殊动态行为问题,从实践出发提出相应的判断路径。
China’s “Administrative Punishment Law” established the principle of “one case not two punishment”, after the subsequent supplement and improvement, the principle of one case not two punishment has become the principle that should be followed in administrative law enforcement. However, the identification of “one thing” is an important premise for the real implementation of the principle of “no one thing but no two penalties”. However, there is no clear set of standards for identifying “one case” in the current legal provisions and practical field. Combined with the characteristics of dynamic and continuous behavior in the transportation field, the identification of primary behavior, continuous behavior and continuing behavior in the transportation law enforcement is discussing the identification of one behavior, continuous behavior and continued behavior in transportation law enforcement, and needle.
[1] | 何乃忠. 试论一事不再罚原则[J]. 现代法学, 1993(1): 71-72, 76. |
[2] | 简敏. 行政处罚中“一事不再罚”原则的适用与例外[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 8(4): 86-89. |
[3] | 吴祖谋, 葛文珠. 试述一事不再罚原则[J]. 法学评论, 1993(5): 27-30. |
[4] | 胡建淼. 论行政处罚“一事不二罚”原则及其“一事”与“二罚”的认定标准[J]. 法学评论, 2023(5): 29-44. |
[5] | 朱新力. 论一事不再罚原则[J]. 法学, 2001(11): 19-25. |
[6] | 胡静, 刘一冰. 论“一事不再罚”在环境行政处罚中的适用[J]. 环境法评论, 2022(2): 76-93. |
[7] | 王丽英. 论海关行政处罚“一事不再罚”的原则[J]. 海关与经贸研究, 2022(43): 94-103. |
[8] | 杨治坤. 行政处罚体系化中的按日连续处罚制度检视与优化[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(6): 61-74. |
[9] | 叶必丰. 行政法的体系化: “行政程序法” [J]. 东方法学, 2021(6): 157-170. |