|
群体优劣势在向上比较中对自我评价及瑞文推理的影响
|
Abstract:
在复杂的社会比较过程中,个体不仅会受到不同比较方向的影响,而且会受到群体表现的影响。本实验利用虚拟现实技术构建虚拟空间,在佩戴头盔后,被试与黄种和黑种虚拟人物将共同完成一系列测试并被告知成绩。在三人中,被试的成绩总是最低的,而黄种虚拟人物的分数则可能高于或者低于黑种虚拟人物。体验结束采用内隐自尊联想测验测量被试对自我的评价,按照属性词的不同,分别进行了情感性和评价性内隐自尊联想测验,结果分别对应自我情感和认知两个维度。并且使用瑞文推理测验记录其流体智力的表现。结果显示,无论在自我情感或认知维度,被试都将积极词汇与自己联结得更为紧密。而且被试内群体的优劣势对其评价性自我概念影响显著,当个体得分较差时,若内群体得分较高,则能够在一定程度上提升对自我的评价,但对情感性自我概念影响不显著,且对流体智力任务表现无明显影响。
In the complex social comparison process, individuals will not only be affected by different comparison directions, but also by group performance. This experiment uses virtual reality technology to construct a virtual space. After wearing a helmet, the subjects and the yellow and black virtual characters will complete a series of tests and be informed of the results. Among the three, the subjects’ scores are always the lowest, while the scores of the yellow avatars may be higher or lower than the black avatars. At the end of the experience, the implicit self-esteem association test was used to measure the participants’ self-evaluation. According to the different attribute words, the emotional and evaluative implicit self-esteem association tests were carried out, and the results corresponded to the two dimensions of self-emotion and cognition, and use the Raven reasoning test to record his fluid intelligence performance. The results showed that, no matter in the self-emotion or cognitive dimension, the subjects connected positive vocabulary more closely with themselves. Moreover, the strengths and weaknesses of the group within the subjects have a significant impact on their evaluative self-concept. When the individual scores are poor, if the inner group scores higher, it can improve the self-evaluation to a certain extent, but it has an impact on the emotional self-concept. It is not significant, and has no obvious effect on the performance of fluid intelligence tasks.
[1] | 蔡华俭(2002). 内隐自尊的作用机制及特性研究. 博士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学. |
[2] | 蔡华俭, 丰怡, 岳曦彤(2011). 泛文化的自尊需要: 基于中国人的研究证据. 心理科学进展, 19(1), 1-8. |
[3] | 蔡华俭, 杨治良(2003). 内隐自尊的稳定性——成败操纵对内隐自尊的影响. 心理科学, 26(3), 461-464. |
[4] | 戴海崎, 张峰, 陈雪枫(2011). 心理与教育测量(第3版). 暨南大学出版社. |
[5] | 何鑫华(2011). 内隐自尊测量方法综述. 齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报, (2), 30-32. |
[6] | 胡聚平(2009). 社会比较对自我评价的影响——自我建构的调节作用. 博士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学. |
[7] | 胡小强(2004). 虚拟现实技术与应用. 高等教育出版社. |
[8] | 李婷(2019). 应用虚拟现实技术增强心理学实验的外部效度. 衡水学院学报, 21(4), 123-128. |
[9] | 吕晓敏(2016). 社会比较情境下内隐自尊变化的性别差异: 恋爱关系中上行、下行比较的影响. 硕士学位论文, 沈阳:沈阳师范大学. |
[10] | 彭凯平, 刘钰, 曹春梅, 张伟(2011). 虚拟社会心理学: 现实, 探索及意义. 心理科学进展, 19(7), 933-943. |
[11] | 王紫薇, 涂平(2014). 社会排斥情境下自我关注变化的性别差异. 心理学报, 46(11), 1782-1792. |
[12] | 邢淑芬, 俞国良(2006). 社会比较: 对比效应还是同化效应? 心理科学进展, 14(6), 944-949. |
[13] | 杨福义, 梁宁建(2007). 内隐自尊与外显自尊的关系: 多重内隐测量的视角. 心理科学, 30(4), 785-790. |
[14] | 杨宜音(2008). 关系化还是类别化: 中国人“我们”概念形成的社会心理机制探讨. 中国社会科学, (4), 148-159. |
[15] | J. P. Robinson, 杨宜音(1997). 性格与社会心理测量总览(pp. 721-807). 台湾远流出版事业股份有限公司. |
[16] | Bailenson, J. N., Aharoni, E., Beall, A. C., Guadagno, R. E., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Comparing Behavioral and Self-Report Measures of Embodied Agents’ Social Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Workshop on Presence (Vol. 1105). IEEE. |
[17] | Blanton, H., Crocker, J., & Miller, D. T. (2000). The Effects of In-Group versus Out-Group Social Comparison on Self-Esteem in the Context of a Negative Stereotype. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1425 |
[18] | Bosson, J. K., Swann Jr., W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the Perfect Measure of Implicit Self-Esteem: The Blind Men and the Elephant Revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.631 |
[19] | Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is This “We”? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 |
[20] | Ellis, S. R. (1995). Nature and Origins of Virtual Environments: A Bibliographical Essay. In R. M. Baecker et al. (Eds.), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 913-932). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051574-8.50096-0 |
[21] | Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S. L., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00162 |
[22] | Greenwald, A. G., Mcghee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 |
[23] | Korn, J. H. (1997). Illusions of Reality: A History of Deception in Social Psychology. State University of New York Press. |
[24] | Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 |
[25] | Schroeder, R. (2002). Social Interaction in Virtual Environments: Key Issues, Common Themes, and a Framework for Research. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments (pp. 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0277-9_1 |
[26] | Stapel, D. A., & Suls, J. (2004). Method Matters: Effects of Explicit versus Implicit Social Comparisons on Activation, Behavior, and Self-Views. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 860-875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.860 |