全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

分离原则下冒名行为的体系展开
Development of the System of Impostor Legal Behavior under the Principle of Separation

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.104230, PP. 291-298

Keywords: 冒名行为,负担行为,分离原则,意思表示
Impostor Legal Behavior
, Burden Behavior, Separation Principle, Representation of Intention

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

冒用他人名义实施的法律行为于民法上产生何种效果,学界目前的主流观点有二:代理行为说与善意取得说。其中代理行为说较为典型,将冒名行为的私法效果依据相对方的身份注意程度,从而适用不同的制度规则。随着社会经济的不断发展,冒名行为的类型层出不穷,例如冒用他人名义处分自己之物时,现有的学说难以进行妥善的处理,对此,需要回归到法律行为本身,依据分离原则将冒名行为分为冒名负担行为与冒名处分行为,通过解释当事人的表意内容确定行为类型与法律关系主体,进而明确负担行为中的冒名实为欺诈,处分行为中的冒名实为无权处分,从而清晰法律关系,权衡保障当事人间的利益,得出更精确且具说服力的观点。
At present, there are two mainstream viewpoints about the effect of legal acts carried out in the name of others on civil law: the theory of agency act and the theory of bona fide acquisition. The agency act theory is a typical one. The private law effect of the impersonation act is based on the identity attention of the opposite party, so different institutional rules can be applied. With the continuous development of social economy, there are endless types of impersonation behavior. For example, when disposing of one’s own property in the name of others, it is difficult to properly deal with the existing theories. In this regard, it is necessary to return to the legal behavior itself and divide the impersonation behavior into the impersonation burden behavior and the impersonation disposition behavior according to the principle of separation. By explaining the expressive content of the parties, the type of behavior and the subject of legal relationship are determined, and then it is clear that the false name in the burden behavior is actually fraud, and the false name in the disposition behavior is actually the right to dispose, so as to clarify the legal relationship, weigh and protect the interests of the parties, and get a more accurate and persuasive point of view.

References

[1]  [德]迪特尔·施瓦布. 民法导论[M]. 郑冲, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 529-530.
[2]  冉克平. 论冒名处分不动产的私法效果[J]. 中国法学, 2015(1): 169-186.
[3]  [德]卡尔·拉伦茨. 德国民法通论(下册) [M]. 王晓晔, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 842-844.
[4]  朱庆育. 民法总论[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 161, 279.
[5]  彭诚信, 李建华. 善意取得合同效力的立法解析与逻辑证成[J]. 中国法学, 2009(4): 85-101.
[6]  杨代雄. 使用他人名义实施法律行为的效果——法律行为主体的“名”与“实” [J]. 中国法学, 2010(4): 89-99.
[7]  王利明. 判例研究(第46辑) [M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2009: 111-112.
[8]  [德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯. 德国民法总论[M]. 邵建东, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 749.
[9]  [德]维尔纳·弗卢梅. 法律行为论[M]. 迟颖, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 929-930.
[10]  郭明龙. 不动产“冒名处分”中善意第三人权益之保护[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2012(5): 722-727.
[11]  [德]鲍尔/施蒂尔纳. 德国物权法(上) [M]. 张双根, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 92.
[12]  李永军. 物权与债权的二元划分对民法内在与外在体系的影响[J]. 法学研究, 2008(5): 62-73.
[13]  王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009: 334-335.
[14]  傅鼎生. 不动产善意取得应排除冒名处分之适用[J]. 法学, 2011(12): 45-55.
[15]  戴永盛. 论不动产冒名处分的法律适用[J]. 法学, 2014(7): 119-132.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133