全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

目的性赠与下的彩礼返还规则研究
A Study on the Rules of Bride Price Return Regarding Purposeful Gift

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.104229, PP. 282-290

Keywords: 彩礼返还规则,不当得利,目的性赠与
Gift Return Rules
, Unjust Gain, Purposeful Gift

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

《最高人民法院关于审理涉彩礼纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》将彩礼的性质明确定义为“目的性赠与”,从而实现了彩礼返还规则与不当得利制度的联立适用,构建了更加灵活的操作模式。首先,在彩礼给付之性质上,将其认定为目的性赠与,参照适用附解除条件的赠与的相关规则,并在条件成就之拟制、赠与合同之缔约过失责任与瑕疵担保责任等问题上,结合涉婚问题的高度人身性,予以谨慎适用。其次,在彩礼返还之性质上,基于构成要件、规范意旨与适用场域等因素,排除了赠与人任意撤销权、赠与人法定撤销权、错误撤销权与情势变更下的合同解除权。最后,在彩礼返还规则的具体适用上,根据不当得利制度规范,结合彩礼的目的性赠与本质,在判定返还范围时,将目的达成状况、彩礼的实际使用与嫁妆情况等因素纳入考量。同时,为防范男方故意悔婚以主张彩礼返还、从而危害女方利益之道德风险,例外地考虑过错因素。
The Provisions of the Supreme Peoples Court on Certain Issues of Applicable Law in the Hearing of Cases Involving Bride Price Disputes clearly define the nature of bride price as “purposeful gift”, thus realizing the joint application of the rules of gift return and the system of undue gain, and constructing a more flexible mode of operation. First, since recognizing the nature of the gift as a purposeful gift, it shall refer to the relevant rules for the conditions applicable to the revocation of gifts, and consider the highly personal nature of marital issues, in the formulation of conditions for achievement, the responsibility for breach of contract in gift contracts, and the liability for defects, caution should be exercised in the application. Secondly, in the nature of gift return, based on the constitutive elements, normative intent, applicable field and other factors, the grantee’s right of arbitrary revocation, the grantee’s right of legal revocation, and the right of error revocation and the situation change of the contract right shall be excluded. Finally, in the specific application of the rules, according to the rules of unjust gain, combined with the nature of “purposeful gift” of the gift, in determining the scope of return, the achievement of the purpose, the actual use of the dowry and other factors shall be taken into consideration. Also, in order to prevent the moral hazard that the husband intentionally repents the marriage in order to advocate the return of the bride price, thereby endangering the woman’s interests, the fault factor shall be taken into account.

References

[1]  杨代雄. 袖珍民法典评注[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2022: 625-626.
[2]  张学军. 彩礼返还制度研究——兼论禁止买卖婚姻和禁止借婚姻索取财物[J]. 中外法学, 2006(5): 624-639.
[3]  胡云红, 宋天一. 彩礼返还纠纷法律适用研究——以全国法院158份问卷调查和相关裁判文书为对象[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(6): 5-27.
[4]  陈棋炎, 等. 民法亲属新论[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 2004: 90-91.
[5]  史尚宽. 亲属法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 138-139.
[6]  Frazier, B. (2001) But I Can’t Marry You: Who Is Entitled to the Engagement Ring When the Conditional Performance Falls Short of the Altar? Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 17, 419-422.
[7]  最高人民法院民事审判庭第一庭. 最高人民法院婚姻法司法解释(二)的理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2015: 144.
[8]  陈爱武, 主编. 最高人民法院婚姻法司法解释精释精解[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2016: 120-121.
[9]  王丹. 彩礼纠纷现状及司法应对[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2023(16): 50-53.
[10]  夏吟兰. 美国现代婚姻家庭制度[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999: 53.
[11]  姚明斌, 刘亦婷. 彩礼返还请求权的规范构造[J]. 南大法学, 2023(4): 1-17.
[12]  傅广宇. “中国民法典”与不当得利: 回顾与前瞻[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019(1): 116-132.
[13]  德维尔纳·弗卢梅. 法律行为论[M]. 迟颖, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 181-189.
[14]  陈卫佐, 译注. 德国民法典[M]. 第4版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2015: 313-314.
[15]  王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009: 104.
[16]  夏静宜. 原因欠缺导致赠与财产返还的原理和规则[J]. 交大法学, 2024(1): 64-80.
[17]  滕雅琳. 在物质利益与社会礼俗之间: 农村彩礼问题研究述评[J]. 农业·农村·农民, 2021(10): 37-41.
[18]  刘凡熙. 从代际关系角度看当前中国农村高额彩礼问题——基于黑龙江M村的调查研究[J]. 学术交流, 2018(1): 130-137.
[19]  黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典合同编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 160.
[20]  王泽鉴. 不当得利[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015: 109.
[21]  谢鸿飞, 朱广新, 主编. 民法典评注: 合同编 典型合同与准合同[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020: 633-635.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133