欺诈性抚养关系的认定及法律救济分析
Identification of Fraudulent Parental Relationships and Analysis of Legal Remedies

近年来，欺诈性抚养案件的数量不断上升，但是我国新颁布的《民法典》并没有相关的明确规定，致使欺诈性抚养的期间界定、请求权主体的范围以及欺诈性抚养侵害的权利等方面都存在较大争议，在司法实践中产生了“同案不同判”的现象。为了保护被欺诈人财产权利以及人格利益，应当将欺诈性抚养的期间扩展到稳定的非婚同居期间，并明确在特定情形下，被欺诈方的近亲属亦有权成为欺诈性抚养的请求权主体。同时，欺诈性抚养系侵权行为，被欺诈人有权要求精神损害赔偿。
In recent years, the number of cases of fraudulent custody has been continuously increasing, but the newly promulgated Civil Code of China does not have clear provisions, resulting in significant disputes over the definition of the period of fraudulent custody, the scope of the subject of the right to request, and the rights infringed upon by fraudulent custody. This has led to the phenomenon of “different judgments for the same case” in judicial practice. In order to protect the property rights and personal interests of the fraudster, the period of fraudulent custody should be extended to a stable period of non marital cohabitation, and it should be clarified that in specific circumstances, close relatives of the fraudster also have the right to become the subject of fraudulent custody requests. Meanwhile, in cases of fraudulent custody infringement, the victim has the right to demand compensation for mental damages.