论作品独创性的判断标准
On the Criteria for Judging the Originality of Works

我国《著作权法》一直未明确“独创性”的概念。在司法实践中，独创性判断标准呈现多样化，同案不同判的现象时有发生。界定独创性并优化其判断标准刻不容缓。认定独创性，应考虑著作权法的目的：明确“独”的规范意义；对“创”的认定，不能单纯考察作品的创新部分在整部作品中的占比，而应对作品类别进行细致区分，考虑涉案表达是否与公有领域的表达有差异。优化独创性判断标准有助于统一司法判决的尺度，确保公正与效率。
The concept of “originality” has not been clearly defined in China’s Copyright Law. In judicial practice, the standards for originality judgment are diverse, and the phenomenon of different judgments for the same case often occurs. It is urgent to define originality and optimize its judgment criteria. To recognize originality, the purpose of copyright law should be considered: to clarify the normative significance of “originality”; the recognition of “creativity” cannot simply examine the proportion of the innovative part of the work in the entire work, but should carefully distinguish the types of works and consider whether the expression in question differs from that in the public domain. Optimizing the criteria for originality judgment helps to unify the scale of judicial judgments, ensuring fairness and efficiency.