认罪认罚从宽制度下相对不起诉权的适用
The Application of Relative Non-Prosecution Right under the System of Acquiring Criminals and Giving Them Mild Punishment

相对不起诉裁量权作为检察权的重要组成部分，在司法实践中具有核心地位。认罪认罚案件相对不起诉的适用，强调是对于犯罪情节轻微的刑事案件，采取与其刑责相适应的司法措施，能够在一定程度上降低诉前羁押率，既能保证打击犯罪，又能最大限度保障人权，从而更好地修复社会关系，提升社会治理效能。相对不起诉与认罪认罚从宽制度在价值取向上具有高度契合性。在认罪认罚从宽制度入法背景下，适度扩大相对不起诉的适用范围、探索认罪认罚案件适用相对不起诉制度是必要的。本文旨在深入探讨认罪认罚从宽制度下相对不起诉适用，从实践考察当前我国认罪认罚案件适用相对不起诉的运行现状以及问题分析，具体而言，立法层面法律规范模糊、体制层面审批程序复杂、机制层面的监督失效等问题，以助于完善认罪认罚案件相对不起诉适用的制度构建。
As an important part of the procuratorial power, the discretion of relative non-prosecution has a core position in judicial practice. The application of relative non-prosecution in plea cases emphasizes that for criminal cases with minor crimes, judicial measures appropriate to their criminal responsibility can reduce the pre-trial detention rate to a certain extent, which can not only ensure the fight against crimes, but also protect human rights to the maximum extent, so as to better repair social relations and improve the efficiency of social governance. Relative non-prosecution and the system of leniency for pleading guilty and taking leniency are highly compatible in value orientation. Under the background of the system of leniency for pleading guilty and taking leniency, it is necessary to moderately expand the application scope of relative non-prosecution and explore the application of relative non-prosecution in plea cases. This paper aims to deeply explore the application of relative non-prosecution under the system of leniency for pleading guilty and taking leniency, and to investigate the current operation status and problem analysis of the application of relative non-prosecution in plea cases in China from practice. Specifically, the legislative level of legal norms is fuzzy, the approval process is complex at the institutional level, and the supervision is ineffective at the institutional level, so as to help improve the construction of the system of relative non-prosecution in plea cases.