|
|
动态碳配额交易政策下高耗能企业减排方式选择研究
|
Abstract:
构建了一条由制造商和零售商组成的供应链基础模型，将动态碳配额交易政策分为两个阶段，建立了动态碳配额交易政策第一阶段与第二阶段下的自主减排和合作减排的四种模型，对供应链成员的碳减排率和利润进行分析比较，得到了高耗能企业减排方式的最优选择。结果表明：在同一动态碳配额交易政策阶段下，企业减排方式的选择取决于节能服务公司的减排水平；在动态碳配额交易政策第二阶段时，企业无论选择何种减排方式都可以通过提升减排水平来保证利润；在动态碳配额政策第一阶段适当的增加初始碳配额，在政策第二阶段适当的提高碳配额约束系数可以有效提高企业的碳减排率，侧面证明了该政策的有效性。
A basic model of supply chain composed of a single manufacturer and a single retailer is constructed, and the dynamic carbon quota trading policy is divided into two stages. Four models of self saving and shared savings under the first and second stages of dynamic carbon quota trading policy are established, and supply chain members’ carbon emission reduction rates and profits are analyzed and compared, and the optimal choice of emission reduction methods for high energy-consuming enterprises is obtained. The results show that: 1) Under the same dynamic carbon quota trading policy stage, the choice of emission reduction methods of enterprise depends on the emission reduction level of energy service company. 2) In the second stage of the dynamic carbon quota trading policy, enterprise can ensure profits by raising the level of emission reduction no matter what emission reduction method they choose. 3) Increasing the initial carbon quota in the first stage of the dynamic carbon quota policy and increasing the constraint coefficient of carbon quota in the second stage of the policy can effectively improve the carbon emission reduction rate of enterprise, which proves the effectiveness of the policy.
| [1] | Turki, S., Sauvey, C. and Rezg, N. (2018) Modelling and Optimization of a Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System with Storage Facility under Carbon Cap and Trade Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.057 |
| [2] | Xu, X., He, P. and Zhang, S. (2021) Channel Addition from Marketplace or Reselling under Regional Carbon Cap-and-Trade Regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 236, Article ID: 108130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108130 |
| [3] | International Carbon Action Partnership (2022) Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2022. ICAP, Berlin. |
| [4] | Qi, S., Cheng, S. and Cui, J. (2021) Environmental and Economic Effects of China’s Carbon Market Pilots: Empirical Evidence Based on a DID Model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, Article ID: 123720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123720 |
| [5] | Wu, L. and Gong, Z. (2021) Can National Carbon Emission Trading Policy Effectively Recover GDP Losses? A New Linear Programming-Based Three-Step Estimation Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, Article ID: 125052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125052 |
| [6] | Ji, C.J., Hu, Y.J., Tang, B.J., et al. (2021) Price Drivers in the Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme: Evidence from Chinese Emissions Trading Scheme Pilots. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, Article ID: 123469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123469 |
| [7] | Fang, S. and Cao, G. (2021) Modelling Extreme Risks for Carbon Emission Allowances—Evidence from European and Chinese Carbon Markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, Article ID: 128023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128023 |
| [8] | 张希良, 张达, 余润心. 中国特色全国碳市场设计理论与实践[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8): 80-94. |
| [9] | Qin, Q., Liang, F., Li, L., et al. (2017) Selection of Energy Performance Contracting Business Models: A Behavioral Decision-Making Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 422-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.058 |
| [10] | Wang, W., Zhou, C. and Li, X. (2019) Carbon Reduction in a Supply Chain via Dynamic Carbon Emission Quotas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, Article ID: 118244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118244 |
| [11] | 夏西强, 路梦圆, 郭磊. 碳交易下碳配额分配方式对制造/再制造影响研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(11): 3001-3015. |
| [12] | Zhang, Y.J., Sun, Y.F. and Huo, B.F. (2021) The Optimal Product Pricing and Carbon Emissions Reduction Profit Allocation of CET-Covered Enterprises in the Cooperative Supply Chain. Annals of Operations Research, 329, 871-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04162-5 |
| [13] | Ji, J., Zhang, Z. and Yang, L. (2017) Comparisons of Initial Carbon Allowance Allocation Rules in an O2O Retail Supply Chain with the Cap-and-Trade Regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.011 |
| [14] | Benjaafar, S., Li, Y. and Daskin, M. (2012) Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights from Simple Models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304 |
| [15] | Du, S., Zhu, L., Liang, L., et al. (2013) Emission-Dependent Supply Chain and Environment-Policy-Making in the “Cap-and-Trade” System. Energy Policy, 57, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.042 |
| [16] | 李细枚, 周建波. 职业经理人激励与两级供应链减排研发的战略选择[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(7): 1071-1081. |
| [17] | Xia, Q., Zhi, B. and Wang, X. (2021) The Role of Cross-Shareholding in the Green Supply Chain: Green Contribution, Power Structure and Coordination. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, Article ID: 108037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108037 |
| [18] | 廖诺, 梁佩仪, 贺勇, 罗雪韵. 能源费用托管型合同下嵌入视角的供应链合作减排决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022: 1-13. |
| [19] | Ouyang, J. and Fu, J. (2020) Optimal Strategies of Improving Energy Efficiency for an Energy-Intensive Manufacturer Considering Consumer Environmental Awareness. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 1017-1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1607977 |
| [20] | 廖诺, 卢晨, 贺勇. 碳交易政策下节能服务公司参与供应链合作减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 160-167. |
| [21] | 贺勇, 陈志豪, 廖诺. 政府补贴方式对绿色供应链制造商减排决策的影响机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 87-98. |
| [22] | 郭雨, 白春光, 张璐, 郑月龙. 碳交易政策下节能服务公司参与减排的合同选择[J]. 工程管理科技前沿, 2022, 41(2): 17-25. |
