全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多模态会话分析视角下反问句的互动功能研究——以《金牌调解》的家庭冲突话语为例
The Interactive Function of Rhetorical Question in Family Conflict Discourse—Taking the Family Conflict Discourse of Gold Medal Mediation as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2024.124240, PP. 222-233

Keywords: 反问句,冲突话语,多模态会话分析
Rhetorical Questions
, Conflict Discourse, Multimodal Conversation Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

家庭冲突在日常交往互动中十分普遍,冲突性话语作为特定的话语类型近年来引起广泛的关注。本研究基于真实的电视访谈类录像,运用会话分析的研究方法,描写冲突话语中反问句的序列位置、反问句的话轮设计,归纳总结冲突话语中反问句的互动功能。本研究中发现反问句出现在以下三种位置:1) 始发位置表达观点的反问句;2) 回应位置以反问句表达观点;3) 第三话轮以反问句表达观点。反问句的话轮设计除了句法资源外,伴随反问句的具身资源如手势、眼神、身势语增强了反问句的否认、质疑、反对的互动功能。本文对冲突话语的研究具有一定的借鉴价值。
Family conflict is very common in daily communication and interaction. As a specific discourse type, conflict discourse has attracted wide attention in recent years. Based on real TV interview videos, this study uses the research method of conversation analysis to describe the sequence position of rhetorical questions in conflict discourse, the design of rhetorical questions’ sentence wheel, and summarizes the interactive function of rhetorical questions in conflict discourse. In this study, it is found that rhetorical questions appear in the following three positions: 1) Rhetorical questions expressing opinions in the initial position; 2) Responding positions to express views as rhetorical questions; 3) Rhetorical questions are used in the third round. In addition to syntactic resources, the embodied resources such as gestures, eyes and body language that accompany rhetorical questions enhance the interactive functions of denial, questioning and opposition. This paper has certain reference value for the study of conflict discourse.

References

[1]  龙海英. 语用修辞视野下不礼貌策略的选择识解——以家庭冲突场景为例[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报, 2015(3): 28-33 49.
[2]  冉永平. 冲突性话语趋异取向的语用分析[J]. 现代外语, 2010, 33(2): 150-157 219.
[3]  高萍. 冲突性话语结束方式研究[J]. 延边教育学院学报, 2007(5): 14-17.
[4]  郭继懋. 反问句的语义语用特点[J]. 中国语文, 1997(2): 111-121.
[5]  赖小玉. 人际和谐管理模式下家庭冲突性话语的语用效应[J]. 外国语文研究, 2016, 2(3): 2-9.
[6]  赵宇. 汉语语境下夫妻间冲突性话语的语用学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2015.
[7]  赖小玉. 家庭冲突中强势反对的不礼貌研究[J]. 现代外语, 2014, 37(1): 42-51 145.
[8]  冉永平, 杨巍. 人际冲突中有意冒犯性话语的语用分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2011, 34(3): 49-55.
[9]  毛俊涵. 婆媳冲突性话语中回应策略的语用分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015(7): 23-29.
[10]  侯艺源. 夫妻争吵话语的多模态互动分析——兼论权势关系对争吵话语模态选择的影响[J]. 汉字文化, 2022(13): 185-190.
[11]  李宇明. 反问句的构成及其理解[J]. 殷都学刊, 1990(3): 91-99.
[12]  常玉钟. 试析反问句的语用含义[J]. 汉语学习, 1992(5): 12-16.
[13]  王艺涵. 老年父母与子女间冲突性话语的多模态分析[J]. 文化创新比较研究, 2022, 6(19): 34-37.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133