全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

政府补贴对企业全要素生产率的影响研究
A Study of the Impact of Government Subsidies on the Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2024.144070, PP. 574-587

Keywords: 政府补贴,企业全要素生产率,制造业企业
Government Subsidies
, Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises, Manufacturing Enterprises

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

政府补贴对企业生产运营和就业创造的影响显著,被视为推动制造业转型发展的关键手段。本研究基于我国制造业上市企业的数据,采用双向固定效应模型,探究政府补贴与企业全要素生产率的因果关系,并通过OP和LP方法进行实证检验。结果显示,政府补贴显著提升了制造业企业的全要素生产率。此外,企业全要素生产率与企业规模和资本密集度正相关,与企业年龄和资产负债比负相关。研究还发现,企业的创新研发投入对政府补贴的效果有负向调节作用,即创新研发投入越高,政府补贴对全要素生产率的提升效果越弱。特别地,政府补贴对高新技术企业全要素生产率的提升作用大于非高新技术企业,这可能是因为高新技术企业更依赖尖端技术。因此,政府应重视其补贴在企业发展中的作用,参照企业特征采取多元化补贴形式,使企业能专注于优势技术领域,从而从宏观层面促进整个行业的技术实力提升。
Government subsidies have a significant impact on enterprise production and operation and job creation, and are regarded as a key means to promote the transformation and development of the manufacturing industry. Based on the data of listed enterprises in China’s manufacturing industry, this study adopts a two-way fixed effect model to explore the causal relationship between government subsidies and enterprises’ total factor productivity, and conducts empirical tests through OP and LP methods. The results show that government subsidies significantly enhance the total factor productivity of manufacturing enterprises. In addition, enterprises’ total factor productivity is positively related to enterprise size and capital intensity, and negatively related to enterprise age and gearing ratio. The study also finds that enterprises’ innovation and R&D investment negatively moderates the effect of government subsidies, i.e., the higher the innovation and R&D investment, the weaker the effect of government subsidies on total factor productivity enhancement. In particular, the effect of government subsidies on total factor productivity is greater for high-tech enterprises than for non-high-tech enterprises, which may be due to the fact that high-tech enterprises rely more on cutting-edge technologies. Therefore, the government should pay attention to the role of its subsidies in the development of enterprises and adopt diversified forms of subsidies with reference to the characteristics of enterprises, so that enterprises can focus on advantageous technological fields, thus promoting the technological strength of the whole industry at the macro level.

References

[1]  黄群慧. 东北地区制造业战略转型与管理创新[J]. 经济纵横, 2015(7): 1-6.
[2]  张勇, 古明明. 重新评估我国的增长潜力——基于全要素生产率和数据分析视角的解释[J]. 经济科学, 2013(2): 5-19.
[3]  赵玉林, 谷军健. 中美制造业发展质量的测度与比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018, 35(12): 116-133.
[4]  Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J. and Zhang, Y. (2012) Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-Level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 97, 339-351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002
[5]  蔡昉. 以提高全要素生产率推动高质量发展[J]. 经济研究信息, 2018(11): 93.
[6]  Cerqua, A. and Pellegrini, G. (2014) Do Subsidies to Private Capital Boost Firms’ Growth? A Multiple Regression Discontinuity Design Approach. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 114-126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.005
[7]  Kang, K.N. and Park, H. (2012) Influence of Government R&D Support and Inter-Firm Collaborations on Innovation in Korean Biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.004
[8]  白俊红. 中国的政府R&D资助有效吗? 来自大中型工业企业的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011, 10(4): 1375-1400.
[9]  Arqué-Castells, P. (2013) Persistence in R&D Performance and Its Implications for the Granting of Subsidies. Review of Industrial Organization, 43, 193-220.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-013-9381-0
[10]  Wieser, R. (2005) Research and Development Productivity and Spillovers: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 587-621.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00260.x
[11]  李政, 杨思莹, 路京京. 政府补贴对制造企业全要素生产率的异质性影响[J]. 经济管理, 2019, 41(3): 5-20.
[12]  胡春阳, 余泳泽. 政府补助与企业全要素生产率——对U型效应的理论解释及实证分析[J]. 财政研究, 2019(6): 72-85.
[13]  陈诗一, 陈登科. 融资约束?企业效率韧性与我国加总全要素生产率研究[J]. 经济学报, 2016, 3(1): 1-31.
[14]  吴爱华. 中国政府研发补贴的信号效应: 所有权重要吗? [J]. 技术预测与社会变革, 2017(117): 339-345.
[15]  Bernini, C. and Pellegrini, G. (2011) How Are Growth and Productivity in Private Firms Affected by Public Subsidy? Evidence from a Regional Policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 253-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.01.005
[16]  Howell, A. (2017) Picking ‘Winners’ in China: Do Subsidies Matter for Indigenous Innovation and Firm Productivity? China Economic Review, 44, 154-165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.04.005
[17]  孙阳阳, 丁玉莲. 政府补贴对民营企业全要素生产率的异质性影响——基于面板门槛模型的实证分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(4): 100-108.
[18]  陈洋林, 储德银, 张长全. 战略性新兴产业财政补贴的激励效应研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(5): 33-41.
[19]  杨洋, 魏江, 罗来军. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2015(1): 75-86, 98, 188.
[20]  白洁. 政府补贴对高科技企业全要素生产率的异质性影响[J]. 学习与实践, 2020(9): 66-74.
[21]  高艳慧, 万迪昉, 蔡地. 政府研发补贴具有信号传递作用吗?——基于我国高技术产业面板数据的分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(1): 5-11
[22]  聂辉华, 江艇, 杨汝岱. 中国工业企业数据库的使用现状和潜在问题[J]. 世界经济, 2012, 35(5): 142-158.
[23]  杨汝岱. 中国制造业企业全要素生产率研究[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(2): 61-74.
[24]  Olley, G.S. and Pakes, A. (1996) The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263-1297.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831
[25]  鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计: 1999-2007 [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
[26]  黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
[27]  毛其淋, 许家云. 政府补贴?异质性与企业风险承担[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 15(4): 1533-1562.
[28]  Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003) Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317-341.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133