By analysing a long series of data (1996-2019), we show that solar cycle 23 was more marked by violent solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) compared to solar cycle 24. In particular, the halo coronal mass ejections associated with X-class flares appear to be among the most energetic events in solar activity given the size of the flares, the speed of the CMEs and the intense geomagnetic storms they produce. Out of eighty-six (86) X-class halo CMEs, thirty-seven (37) or 43% are highly geoeffective; twenty-four (24) or approximately 28% are moderately geoeffective and twenty-five (25) or 29% are not geoeffective. Over the two solar cycles (1996 to 2019), 71% of storms were geoeffective and 29% were not. For solar cycle 23, about 78% of storms were geoeffective, while for solar cycle 24, about 56% were geoeffective. For the statistical study based on speed, 85 halo CMEs associated with X-class flares were selected because the CME of 6 December 2006 has no recorded speed value. For both solar cycles, 75.29% of the halo CMEs associated with X-class flares have a speed greater than 1000 km/s. The study showed that 42.18% of halo (X) CMEs with speeds above 1000 km/s could cause intense geomagnetic disturbances. These results show the contribution (in terms of speed) of each class of halo (X) CMEs to the perturbation of the Earth’s magnetic field. Coronal mass ejections then become one of the key indicators of solar activity, especially as they affect the Earth.
References
[1]
Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S. and Akiyama, S. (2007) Geoeffectiveness of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012149
[2]
Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Xie, H., Akiyama, S. and Mäkelä, P. (2015) Properties and Geoeffectiveness of Magnetic Clouds during Solar Cycles 23 and 24.Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120, 9221-9245. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021446
[3]
Srivastava, N. and Venkatakrishnan, P. (2004) Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Major Geomagnetic Storms during 1996-2002. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010175
[4]
Gopalswamy, N. (2018) Extreme Solar Eruptions and Their Space Weather Consequences. Extreme Events in Geospace, 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812700-1.00002-9
[5]
Gopalswamy, N., Akiyama, S., Yashiro, S. and Mäkelä, P. (2010) Coronal Mass Ejections from Sunspot and Non-Sunspot Regions. Magnetic Coupling between the Interior and Atmosphere of the Sun, 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02859-5_24
[6]
Michalek, G. and Yashiro, S. (2013) CMEs and Active Regions on the Sun. Advances in Space Research, 52, 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.001
[7]
Forbes, T.G. (2000) A Review on the Genesis of Coronal Mass Ejections. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 105, 23153-23165. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000005
[8]
Kim, R.-S., Cho, K.-S., Moon, Y.-J., Kim, Y.-H., Yi, Y., Dryer, M., Bong, S.-C. and Park, Y.-D. (2005) Forecast Evaluation of the Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) Geoeffectiveness Using Halo CMEs from 1997 to 2003. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 110. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011218
[9]
Zhang, J., Richardson, I.G., Webb, D.F., Gopalswamy, N., Huttunen, E., Kasper, J.C., Nitta, N.V., Poomvises, W., Thompson, B.J., Wu, C.-C., Yashiro, S. and Zhukov, A. (2007) Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Major Geomagnetic Storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) during 1996-2005. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012321
[10]
Plunkett, S.P. (2005) The Extreme Solar Storms of October to November 2003. Space Science Division.
[11]
Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V. (2012) Solar Wind Drivers of Geomagnetic Storms during More than Four Solar Cycles. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 2, Article Number A01. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012001
[12]
Richardson, I.G. (2013) Geomagnetic Activity during the Rising Phase of Solar Cycle 24. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 3, Article Number A08. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013031