|
|
独立董事与CEO间社会关系对内部控制质量的影响研究
|
Abstract:
本文以2017~2022年我国沪深A股上市公司为研究对象，独立董事与CEO间社会关系对内部控制质量的影响，并且进一步探究产权性质是否会在此影响中存在调节作用。实证结果表明：独立董事与CEO间社会关系对内部控制质量的改善有显著促进作用；产权性质在此影响中存在调节作用，相比国有公司，非国有公司中，独董与CEO间社会关系对内部控制质量的促进作用更加显著。
This article takes Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2017 to 2022 as the research object, investigates the impact of social relationships between independent directors and CEOs on the quality of internal control, and further explores whether the nature of property rights will have a moderating effect on this impact. The empirical results indicate that the social relationship between independent directors and CEOs has a significant promoting effect on the improvement of internal control quality; the nature of property rights has a moderating effect on this impact. Compared to state-owned companies, non-state-owned companies have a more significant promoting effect on the quality of internal control through the social relationship between independent directors and CEOs.
| [1] | 刘诚, 杨继东, 周斯洁. 社会关系、独立董事任命与董事会独立性[J]. 经济管理, 2012(12): 83-101. |
| [2] | 尹律, 戚振东, 杨婧. “认本家”情结与企业内部控制有效性[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2022(1): 81-86. |
| [3] | Gu, Z., Li, Z., Yang, Y.G., et al. (2019) Friends in Need Are Friends Indeed: An Analysis of Social Ties between Financial Analysts and Mutual Fund Managers. Accounting Review, 94, 153-181. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52160 |
| [4] | 韩少真, 潘颖, 张晓明. 公司治理水平与经营业绩——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国经济问题, 2015(1): 50-62. |
| [5] | 姚益龙, 刘巨松, 刘冬妍. 要素市场发展差异、产权性质与异地并购绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014(5): 102-111. |
| [6] | 陆瑶, 胡江燕. CEO与董事间“老乡”关系对公司违规行为的影响研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016(2): 52-62. |
| [7] | 张十根. CEO与董事间的“老乡”关系、内部控制质量与代理成本[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2019(4): 88-94. |
| [8] | 程博, 潘飞, 王建玲. 儒家文化、信息环境与内部控制[J]. 会计研究, 2016(12): 79-84 96. |
| [9] | 杨小舟, 孙希荣. CEO董事间的“本家关系”与内部控制有效性[J]. 南昌大学学报, 2022(4): 34-45. |
