This paper introduces a framework of in-out duality, merging insights from quantum mechanics with social sciences to illuminate the complex interplay between internal potentialities and external manifestations. It articulates foundational, mathematical axioms (Entanglement, Homogeneity, Emergence, and Measurement) that underpin the dynamics of systems, emphasizing the interconnectedness and emergent behaviors resulting from internal and external interactions. By exploring quantum concepts like coherence, entanglement, and superposition, the paper proposes an interdisciplinary approach termed Quantum Social Mechanics. This approach challenges classical paradigms, advocating for a reevaluation of conventional notions through the lens of quantum principles. The paper argues that understanding the universe’s complexities requires a synthesis of motion states and potential states, suggesting a paradigm shift towards integrating quantum mechanics into the philosophical foundation of social theory. Through this comprehensive framework, the paper aims to foster a deeper understanding of the universe’s interconnected nature and the dynamic processes that govern the emergence of complex systems and behaviors.
References
[1]
Archer, M. (2015) The Relation Subject. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[2]
Van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
[3]
Worrall, J. (1989) Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
[4]
Rovelli, C. (1996) Relational Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, 1637-1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302261
[5]
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, London. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
[6]
Wendt, A. (2015) Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316005163
[7]
Höne, K.E. (2017) Quantum Social Science. In: James, P., Ed., Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations, Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0203
[8]
Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. Harper & Row, New York.
[9]
Home, D. (1997) Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9808-1
[10]
Laloë, F. (2001) Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? American Journal of Physics, 69, 655-701. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1356698
[11]
Taylor, C. (1971) Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3-51.
[12]
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
[13]
Searle, J. R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin, London.
[14]
Searle, J. (2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
[15]
Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46, 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
[16]
Kant, I. (1934) Critique of Pure Reason. Macmillan, London.
[17]
Monteiro, N.P. and Ruby, K.G. (2009) IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations. International Theory, 1, 15-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000050
[18]
Jackson, P.T. (2004) Hegel’s House, or ‘People Are States Too’. Review of International Studies, 30, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504006072
[19]
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 208. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
[20]
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
[21]
Schouten, P. (2013) The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41, 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813484818
[22]
Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981) Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In: Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A.V., Eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology:Towards an Integration of Micro-and Macro-sociologies, Routledge, London, 277-303.
[23]
Mayer, M. (2012) Chaotic Climate Change and Security. International Political Sociology, 6, 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00157.x
[24]
Acuto, M. and Curtis, S. (2014) Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. In: Acuto, M. and Curtis, S., Eds., Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations, Palgrave Pivot, Houndmills, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969
[25]
Connolly, W.E. (2013) The ‘New Materialism’ and the Fragility of Things. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41, 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813486849
[26]
Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623
[27]
Coole, D. (2013) Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41, 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813481006
[28]
Lundborg, T. and Williams, N.V. (2015) New Materialisms, Discourse Analysis, and International Relations: A Radical Intertextual Approach. Review of International Studies, 41, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000163
[29]
Popper, K.R. (1965) The Logic of Scientific Inquiry. Harper Torchbook, New York.
