全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中文版社会奖励问卷的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Social Reward Questionnaire

DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.144209, PP. 201-207

Keywords: 社会奖励问卷,信度,效度,项目反应理论
Social Reward Questionnaire
, Reliability, Validity, Item Response Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究旨在检验中文版社会奖励问卷(Chinese Social Rewards Questionnaire, SRQ-C)在我国成年人群中的心理测量学特性。采取方便抽样的方法,回收有效问卷503份。验证性因子分析证明了与原问卷六维度模型的一致性;各维度的McDonald’s ω系数在0.71~0.79之间;多维项目反应理论分析表明题目都具有中等及以上的区分度。中文版社会奖励问卷具有较好的结构效度、内部一致性信度以及较高的区分度,可用于评估我国成年群体的社会奖励喜好程度。
This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese Social Reward Questionnaire among Chinese adults. 503 valid questionnaires were collected by convenient sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis supports the six-factor model of the original questionnaire. McDonald’s ω coefficient of each dimension is 0.71 to 0.79. The multidimensional item response theory analysis shows that all of the items have medium or above discrimination. The Chinese version of the social reward questionnaire has good structural validity, internal consistency reliability and high discrimination, which can be used to evaluate the preference of social rewards in Chinese adults.

References

[1]  冯果, 黄鑫, 田容博(2021). 社会排斥对青少年金钱和社会奖赏加工的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(4), 678-682.
[2]  康春花, 辛涛(2010). 测验理论的新发展: 多维项目反应理论. 心理科学进展, 18(3), 530-536.
[3]  刘海东, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 黄达武, 刘露(2023). 奥维耶多坚毅量表中文版信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 31(2), 370-373.
[4]  Brouillette-Alarie, S., Lee, S. C., Longpre, N., & Babchishin, K. M. (2022). An Examination of the Latent Constructs in Risk Tools for Individuals Who Sexually Offend: Applying Multidimensional Item Response Theory to the Static-2002R. Assessment, 30, 1249-1264.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221076373
[5]  Buss, A. H. (1983). Social Rewards and Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 553-563.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.553
[6]  Cascio, C. J., Moore, D., & McGlone, F. (2019). Social Touch and Human Development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 35, 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009
[7]  Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
[8]  Clements, C. C., Zoltowski, A. R., Yankowitz, L. D., Yerys, B. E., Schultz, R. T., & Herrington, J. D. (2018). Evaluation of the Social Motivation Hypothesis of Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 75, 797-808.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1100
[9]  Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problem of Internal Consistency Estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399-412.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
[10]  Fareri, D. S., & Delgado, M. R. (2014). Social Rewards and Social Networks in the Human Brain. Neuroscientist, 20, 387-402.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858414521869
[11]  Foulkes, L., McCrory, E. J., Neumann, C. S., & Viding, E. (2014a). Inverted Social Reward: Associations between Psychopathic Traits and Self-Report and Experimental Measures of Social Reward. PLOS ONE, 9, e106000.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106000
[12]  Foulkes, L., Viding, E., McCrory, E., & Neumann, C. S. (2014b). Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and Validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 201.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201
[13]  Lee, J., Jimenez, A. M., Reavis, E. A., Horan, W. P., Wynn, J. K., & Green, M. F. (2019). Reduced Neural Sensitivity to Social vs Nonsocial Reward in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45, 620-628.
https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby109
[14]  Muraki, E., & Carlson, J. E. (1995). Full-Information Factor Analysis for Polytomous Item Responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 73-90.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900109
[15]  Oumeziane, B. A., Schryer-Praga, J., & Foti, D. (2017). “Why Don’t They ‘Like’ Me More?”: Comparing the Time Courses of Social and Monetary Reward Processing. Neuropsychologia, 107, 48-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.001
[16]  Rey, G., Jouvent, R., & Dubal, S. (2009). Schizotypy, Depression, and Anxiety in Physical and Social Anhedonia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 695-708.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20577
[17]  Sankar, A., Yttredahl, A. A., Fourcade, E. W., Mickey, B. J., Love, T. M., Langenecker, S. A., & Hsu, D. T. (2019). Dissociable Neural Responses to Monetary and Social Gain and Loss in Women with Major Depressive Disorder. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, Article 149.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00149
[18]  Smeijers, D., Uzieblo, K., Glennon, J. C., Driessen, J. M. A., & Brazil, I. A. (2021). Examining Individual Differences in Social Reward Valuation: A Person-Based Approach. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44, 312-325.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09934-8
[19]  Ul Hassan, M., & Miller, F. (2019). Discrimination with Unidimensional and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models for Educational Data. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 51, 2992-3012.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1705344
[20]  Wang, Z., Li, Q., Nie, L., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Neural Dynamics of Monetary and Social Reward Processing in Social Anhedonia. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15, 991-1003.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa128
[21]  Yang, X., Liu, S., Wang, D., Liu, G., & Harrison, P. (2020). Differential Effects of State and Trait Social Anhedonia on Suicidal Ideation at 3-Months Follow Up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 262, 23-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.056

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133