全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

网络货运市场中承运人代理模式均衡策略研究
Research on the Equilibrium Strategy of Carrier Agency Mode in the Network Freight Market

DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.142118, PP. 127-137

Keywords: 货运平台,博弈论,代理模式,均衡策略
Freight Platform
, Game Theory, Proxy Mode, Balancing Strategy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在网络货运市场上,承运人可以通过传统的货运平台提供运输,也可以通过建立其他在线预订方式来占有原来的货运市场。同时,货运平台也可以通过独家代理或混合代理的方式与承运人合作。本研究运用博弈论模型来研究承运人占有与货运平台策略之间的相互作用。本文观察到,只有当潜在市场较小的承运人占有时,才会出现原本与潜在市场较大的承运人联系的货运平台成为唯一选择的混合代理的情况。除此之外,只有满足代理费用较低或替代程度较高的情况下,两个货运平台同时考虑混合代理的概率才相对较小。然而,影响各载体是否侵犯的因素存在显著差异。对于潜在市场较小的承运人,代理费是最重要的决定因素,而另一方则更关注替代程度。
In the online freight market, carriers can provide transportation through traditional freight platforms, or they can occupy the original freight market by establishing other online booking methods. At the same time, freight platforms can also work with carriers through exclusive agents or hybrid agents. This study uses a game theory model to study the interaction between carrier possession and freight platform strategies. This paper observes that it is only when a carrier with a smaller potential market is in possession that a freight platform that would otherwise be connected to a carrier with a larger potential market becomes the only hybrid agent of choice. Inaddition, only when the agent cost is lower or the degree of substitution is higher, the probability of the two freight platforms considering hybrid agents at the same time is relatively small. However, there are significant differences in the factors influencing whether each vector is invasive. For carriers with a smaller potential market, agency fees are the most important determining factor, while the other party is more concerned about the degree of substitution.

References

[1]  Adobor, H. (2019.) Supply Chain Resilience: A Multi-Level Framework. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22, 533-556.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2018.1551483
[2]  Asadabadi, A. and Miller-Hooks, E. (2018) Co-Opetition in Enhancing Global Port Network Resiliency: A Multi Leader, Common-Follower Game Theoretic Approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 108, 281-298.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.01.004
[3]  Berry, L.L., Bolton, R.N., Bridges, C.H., et al. (2010) Opportunities for Innovation in the Delivery of Interactive Retail Services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 155-167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.001
[4]  Chen, J.H., Zhuang, C.L., Xu, H. and Xu, L. (2022) Collaborative Management Evaluation of Container Shipping Alliance in Maritime Logistics Industry: CKYHE Case Analysis. Ocean & Coastal Management, 225, 106176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106176
[5]  刘伟, 魏伟, 崔天明, 等. 领导力对多层次供应链企业社会责任管理的影响[J]. 运筹学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 29(3):483-496.
[6]  Liu, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2006) Research Note—The Benefits of Personalized Pricing in a Channel. Marketing Science, 25, 97-105.
[7]  李涛, 谢军, 赵晓霞. 竞争供应链中的供应商侵占[J]. 国际生产经济学杂志(增刊), 2015(5): 391.
[8]  Arya, A., Mittendorf, B. and Sappington, D. (2007) The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment. Marketing Science, 26, 651-659.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0280
[9]  David, A. and Adida, E. (2015) Competition and Coordination in a Two-Channel Supply Chain. Production and Operations Management, 24, 1358-1370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12327
[10]  Zhang, Z., Song, H.M., Gu, X.Y., et al. (2021) How to Compete with a Supply Chain Partner: Retailer’s Store Brand vs. Manufacturer’s Encroachment. Omega, 103, 102412.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102412
[11]  曹磊, 李磊. 零售商跨渠道整合的决定因素: 全渠道零售的创新扩散视角[J]. 互动营销学报, 2018, 44(1): 1-16.
[12]  Nie, J.J., Zhong, L., Yan, H., et al. (2019) Retailers’ Distribution Channel Strategies with Cross-Channel Effect in a Competitive Market. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 32-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.019
[13]  张丽华, 姚建军, 徐磊. 减排与市场侵占: 制造商是否开辟直接渠道? [J]. 清洁生产学报, 2020(12): 1932.
[14]  刘杰, 王国强, 王建军. 基于服务竞争的海上运输链承运人联盟激励分析与协调[J]. 交通运输工程学报(自然科学版), 2019, 28(3): 393-398.
[15]  李晓明, 陈建军, 艾晓明. 需求信息不对称下的交叉销售供应链契约设计[J]. 运筹学学报(理学版), 2019, 27(5): 939-956.
[16]  Bian, J.S., Zhao, X. and Liu, Y.C. (2020) Single vs. Cross Distribution Channels with Manufacturers’ Dynamic Tacit Collusion. International Journal of Production Economics, 220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.029
[17]  Dong, G.Q., Huang, R.B. and Ng, P. (2016) Tacit Collusion between Two Terminals of a Port. Elsevier, 93, 199-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.001
[18]  黄海涛, 何玉华, 陈建军. 国际奢侈品牌供应链中存在灰色市场的跨市场销售渠道策略[J]. 交通运输技术与工程, 2020, 19(2): 1-4.
[19]  蔡国生, 戴勇, 周世祥. 互补性商品市场中的独家渠道与收益分享[J]. 市场科学, 2012(31): 172-187.
[20]  Lan, Y.F., Yan, H.K., Da, R. and Rui, G. (2019) Merger Strategies in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Capital-Constrained Retailers upon Market Power Dependent Trade Credit. Omega, 83, 299-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.08.009

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133