Refugee settlements face several challenges in transitioning from a temporary planning approach to more sustainable settlements. This is mainly due to an increase in the number of forcibly displaced people over the last few decades, and the difficulties of sustainably providing social services that meet the required standards. The development of refugee settlements assumed that forcibly displaced people would return to their places or countries of origin. Unfortunately, displacement situations are prolonged indefinitely, forcing these people to spend most of their lives in conditions that are often deplorable and substandard, and therefore unsustainable. In most cases, the establishment of refugee settlements is triggered by an emergency caused by an influx of forcibly displaced people, who need to be accommodated urgently and provided with some form of international assistance and protection. This leaves little or no time for proper planning for long-term development as required. In addition, the current approach to temporary settlement harms the environment and can strain limited resources with ad hoc development models that have exacerbated difficulties. As a result, living conditions in refugee settlements have deteriorated over the last few decades and continue to pose challenges as to how best to design, plan, and sustain settlements over time. To contribute to addressing these challenges, this study proposes a new methodology supported by Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and a Systems Modeling Language (SysML) to develop a typical sustainable human settlement system model, which has functionally and operationally executed using a Systems Engineering (SE) approach. To assess the sustainability capacity of the proposed system, this work applies a matrix of crossed impact multiplication through a case study by conducting a system capacity interdependence analysis (SCIA) using the MICMAC methodology (Cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification) to assess the interdependency that exist between the sub-systems categories to deliver services at the system level. The sustainability analysis results based on capacity variables influence and dependency models shows that development activities in the settlement are unstable and, therefore, unsustainable since there is no apparent difference between the influential and dependent data used for the assessment. These results illustrate that an integrated system could improve human settlements’ sustainability and that capacity building in service delivery is beneficial and necessary.
References
[1]
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2023) Global Appeal 2023. https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalappeal-2023
[2]
Vemuru, V., Oka, R., Gengo, R. and Gettler L. (2016) Refugee Impacts on Turkana Hosts—A Social Impact Analysis for Kakuma Town and Refugee Camp Turkana County, Kenya. The Word Bank & UNHCR. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/359161482490953624/pdf/111309-REVISED-PUBLIC-Turkana-Social-Impact-Analysis-December-2016.pdf
[3]
World Bank (2023) World Development Report—Migrants, Refugees and Societies— A World Bank Group Flagship Report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2023
[4]
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2003) Sustainable Development and Human Settlements https://www.cepal.org/en/topics/sustainable-development-and-human-settlements
[5]
Hackett, S.C. (2011) Environmental and Natural Resources Economics: Theory, Policy, and the Sustainable Society. Routledge, London.
[6]
Læssøe, J. (2010) Education for Sustainable Development, Participation, and Socio-Cultural Change. Environmental Education Research, 16, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504016
[7]
Lavergne, R. and Saxby, J. (2001) Capacity Development: Vision and Implication. Capacity Development Occasional Series. Canadian International Development Agency, Gatineau.
[8]
UN-HABITAT (2016) Kalobeyei Settlement Advisory Development Plan (2016-2026). https://unhabitat.org/kalobeyei-settlement-advisory-development-plan-turkana-county-kenya-final-draft
[9]
UNHCR (2018) Kalobeyei Integrated Socio-Economic Development Plan (KISEDP) in Turkana West. https://www.unhcr.org/ke/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/KISEDP.pdf
[10]
Fellesson, M. (2023) A Sustainable Solution or Just a Different Form of Humanitarian Assistance? Examining the Kalobeyei Integrated Socio-Economic Development Plan (KISEDP). Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42, 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad001
[11]
Betts, A., Omata, N. and Sterck, O. (2020) The Kalobeyei Settlement: A Self-Reliance Model for Refugees? Journal of Refugee Studies, 33, 189-223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez063
[12]
Kalobeyei Settlement and Kakuma Camp Surveys Result Analysis.Kalobeyei Responses on Shelter, Water and Energy.pdf
[13]
UNHCR and NRC (2018) A Study Conducted by the Moving Energy Initiative (MEI) a Partnership between Energy 4 Impact, Chatham House, Practical Action, the Norwegian Refugee Council and the UNHCR, on Prices, Products, and Priorities of Clean, Safe and Affordable Energy in Kakuma Refugee Camp. https://energy4impact.org/news/moving-energy-initiative-brings-clean-energy-and-improves-livelihoods-kakuma-refugees
[14]
Godet, M. (2006) Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. Economica, Paris.
[15]
Bouabid, A. and Louis, G.E. (2016) Capacity Factor Analysis for Evaluating Water and Sanitation Infrastructure Choices for Developing Communities. Journal of Environmental Management, 161, 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.012
[16]
Fauzi, A., Rahma, H., et al. (2019) Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia. Sustainability, 11, Article 5861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205861
[17]
Ratnasari, E.D., Susilowati I. and Maria, N.S.B. (2023). Small-Scale Vannamei Shrimp Farm Business Sustainability Analysis with MICMAC: A Study on Kebumen Coastal Area, Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8, Article e0659. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i3.659
[18]
Amadei, B. (2020). Challenges Article: A Systems Approach to Building Community Capacity and Resilience. Challenges, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe11020028
[19]
Benjumea-Arias, M., et al. (2016) Structural Analysis of Strategic Variables through MICMAC Use: Case Study. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 11-19. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alejandro-Valencia-Arias/publication/305272221_Structural_Analysis_of_Strategic_Variables_through_MICMAC_Use_Case_Study/links/578d610708ae59aa66815b96/Structural-Analysis-of-Strategic-Variables-through-MICMAC-Use-Case-Study.pdf https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4p11
[20]
Gordon, T., Brown, B. and Helmer, O. (1966) Social Technology. Basic Books, New York. https://books.google.com/books/about/Social_Technology.html?id=R6oDAAAAMAAJ
[21]
UNHCR (2022) KISEDP Progress Report July 2019-June 2021. https://www.unhcr.org/ke/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/KISEDP-progress-report-July-2019-June-2021.pdf
[22]
UN-HABITAT (2022) Kakuma-Kalobeyei Future Vision: Enhancing Self Reliance for Refugees and Hosting Communities in Turkana West, Kenya. Nairobi.