不能犯理论辨析与完善路径
Discussion on the Theory of Inadmissible Offences and the Path to Improvement

在我国刑法理论中，关于不能犯的问题没有得到较统一的解决方法。关于不能犯理论中的核心问题、危险判断标准，大陆传统学说是抽象危险说，但通说的缺陷难以忽视，寻找合适的理论进路迫在眉睫。本文着重论述分析了危险判断各学说的判断方式以及我国和日本的实践选择，并通过对实例解读来寻找我国不能犯问题的研究进路，以平衡理论和实践的争论和混乱。笔者认为，适用具体危险说＋具体一般人作为危险的判断标准更为合适，既能协调理论界和实务界观点的分歧，更有利于我国客观刑法立场在司法中实际彰显。
In China’s criminal law theory, there is no unified solution to the problem of not committing a crime. About the problem of not committing a crime in the theory, the danger judgment standard, the mainland traditional doctrine is the abstract danger, but the defects of the general saying are difficult to ignore, and looking for the appropriate theory of the way forward is urgent. This paper focuses on the discussion and analysis of the judgment of danger judgment of the various doctrines and China's Macao region, China’s mainland practice choices, and through the interpretation of the example to find China's inability to commit the problem of the study of the way forward, in order to balance the theory and practice of the controversy and confusion. In the author’s view, the application of specific danger specific general person as the standard of judgment of danger is more appropriate, not only can harmonize the differences between the theoretical and practical viewpoints, more conducive to China's objective criminal law stance in the justice of the actual manifestation.