|
台词声音权的界定与保护研究——以全国首例台词声音权纠纷案为例
|
Abstract:
随着现代信息技术的迅速发展,声音作为重要的传播媒介应用逐渐广泛,商品化程度不断加深,侵权现象愈发普遍。在影视艺术领域,台词声音作为普遍声音的特殊表现形式,同样面临着侵权风险。《民法典》准用肖像权的规定保护声音,但并未明确声音的法律属性。因此,界定声音的法律属性具有理论和现实意义。本文通过肖像权独立成权的过往经验证成声音权的法律属性,并以全国首例台词声音权纠纷案为抓手,从台词声音权主体、客体和对应性三要素出发,分析台词声音权的特性。在此基础上,从权利保护形态和方式角度提出法律保护建议,以促进台词声音权的规范化发展。
With the rapid development of modern information technology, the application of sound as an important medium of communication is gradually becoming more widespread, the degree of sound commercialization is deepening, and Violations of the right to sound are becoming more and more common. In the field of film and television art, the sound of lines, as a special form of expression of universal sound, also faces the same risk of being damaged. The Civil Code quasi-protects sound with the provisions of the portrait right, but does not clarify the legal attributes of sound. Therefore, it is of theoretical and practical significance to define the legal attributes of sound. This article proves the legal attribute of sound right through the past experience of an independent right of portrait rights, and takes the first dispute case of sound right of lines as a starting point to analyse the characteristics of the sound right of lines from the three elements of subject, object and correspondence of the sound right of lines. On this basis, it puts forward legal protection proposals from the perspective of the form and manner of protection of rights, in order to promote the normative development of the right to the sound of lines.
[1] | 薛建博. 论电视综艺晚会中灯光变幻的音乐性[J]. 广播与电视技术, 2008(3): 99-100 102. |
[2] | [美]奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯. 法律的道路[M]. 李俊晔, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2018. |
[3] | 广西高级人民法院. 广西审判实践与前沿[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2015. |
[4] | 温世扬, 刘昶. 肖像权的特质与规则表达[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2021, 36(4): 55-69. |
[5] | 马克思, 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018. |
[6] | 宋凡. 《民法典》时代下“深度伪造”科技风险与应对模式[J]. 中国电信业, 2020(10): 28-32. |
[7] | [德]卡尔·拉伦茨. 法学方法论[M]. 陈爱娥, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003. |
[8] | 姜晓华. 声音的法律属性论争与证成——我国《民法典》第1023条第2款的法教义学分析[J]. 北方法学, 2022, 16(5): 70-80. |
[9] | 王利明. 论人格权请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权的分离[J]. 中国法学, 2019(1): 224-243. |
[10] | [德]卡尔·拉伦茨. 德国民法通论上[M]. 王晓晔, 邵建东, 程建英, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013. |
[11] | 王利明, 程啸, 朱虎. 中华人共和国民法典人格权编释义[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020. |
[12] | 张海燕, 苏捷. 论人格权禁令程序的路径选择[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2022(6): 127-137. |