|
认罪认罚从宽案件中律师角色的转变与挑战
|
Abstract:
认罪认罚从宽制度是我国刑事诉讼中制度的重要组成部分,其适用与推广使得律师角色面临转变与挑战。认罪认罚从宽制度的核心在于“认罪”、“认罚”、“从宽”三点,制度原型虽然是美国辩诉交易制度,但也存在显著区别。认罪认罚从宽制度的适用不仅使律师的角色转变为协商者与监督者,而且让律师需要面对忠诚义务、专业能力和沟通能力三方面的挑战。为此,有必要加强对律师权利的保护、加强对律师专业能力和职业道德的培训。
The system of leniency for guilty pleas is an important part of China’s criminal procedure system, and its application and promotion have led to changes and challenges in the role of lawyers. The core of the leniency system lies in the three points of “guilty plea”, “guilty to punishment” and “leniency”, and although the prototype of the system is the United States plea bargaining system, there are also significant differences. The application of the system of leniency for guilty pleas not only transforms the role of lawyers into that of negotiators and supervisors, but also makes it necessary for lawyers to face the challenges of the duty of loyalty, professional competence and communication skills. For this reason, it is necessary to strengthen the protection of the rights of lawyers and their training in professional competence and ethics.
[1] | 顾永忠. 关于“完善认罪认罚从宽制度”的几个理论问题[J]. 当代法学, 2016, 30(6): 129-137. |
[2] | 胡俊, 李炜. 检察环节认罪认罚从宽制度实践分析[C]//国家检察官学院, 中国人民大学法学院. 认罪认罚从宽制度的理论与实践——第十三届国家高级检察官论坛论文集. 北京: 中国检察出版社, 2017: 5. |
[3] | 洪浩, 方姚. 论我国刑事公诉案件中被追诉人的反悔权——以认罪认罚从宽制度自愿性保障机制为中心[J].政法论丛, 2018(4): 49-59. |
[4] | 蔡艺. 认罪认罚案件中的有效辩护——以辩诉交易中有效辩护的标准为借鉴[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2021, 36(1): 128-136. |
[5] | 张军. 最高人民检察院工作报告[N]. 人民日报, 2023-03-18(004). |
[6] | 何秉群, 何祎. 认罪认罚从宽制度之公正价值考量[C]//国家检察官学院, 中国人民大学法学院. 认罪认罚从宽制度的理论与实践——第十三届国家高级检察官论坛论文集. 北京: 中国检察出版社, 2017: 4. |
[7] | 熊秋红. 比较法视野下的认罪认罚从宽制度——兼论刑事诉讼“第四范式” [J]. 比较法研究, 2019(5): 80-101. |
[8] | 王敏远. 认罪认罚从宽制度疑难问题研究[J]. 中国法学, 2017(1): 17-34. |
[9] | 冀祥德. 提高我国刑事辩护质量的另一条路径——再论刑事辩护准入制度的建立[J]. 法学杂志, 2008(4): 74-76. |
[10] | 孙笑侠. 法律家的技能与伦理[J]. 法学研究, 2001(4): 3-18. |