全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

ERCP选择性胆管插管困难的研究进展
Advancements in Research on Challenges in Selective Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

DOI: 10.12677/JCPM.2024.31016, PP. 100-110

Keywords: 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),选择性胆管插管,胆管插管困难,应用效果
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
, Selective Biliary Cannulation, Cannulation Difficulty, Application Effect

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

选择性胆管插管(Selective biliary cannulation, SBS)是内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retro-grade cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)成功的基础步骤,然而其有着不容小觑的失败率。当标准插管技术失败后,选择何种辅助插管技术及抢救技术以成功实现胆管插管是摆在内镜医师面前的重要难题。本文旨在对困难胆管插管的定义、影响因素、相关并发症及不同辅助插管技术进行综述,以期为内镜医师提供循证医学参考。
Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) constitutes a pivotal step for the success of endoscopic retro-grade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, it poses a significant failure rate that merits at-tention. Identifying the appropriate auxiliary cannulation methods and salvage techniques follow-ing the failure of conventional cannulation approaches is a notable obstacle for endoscopists. This review delves into the complexities surrounding difficult biliary cannulation, including its defini-tion, determinants, associated complications, and adjunctive cannulation strategies, aiming to fur-nish endoscopists with well-founded clinical guidance.

References

[1]  McCune, W.S., Shorb, P.E. and Moscovitz, H. (1968) Endoscopic Cannulation of the Ampulla of Vater: A Preliminary Report. Annals of Surgery, 167, 752-756.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196805000-00013
[2]  李鹏, 王拥军, 王文海. 中国ERCP指南(2018版) [J]. 中国医刊, 2018, 53(11): 1185-1215+1180.
[3]  Tse, F., Yuan, Y., Mo-ayyedi, P. and Leontiadis, G.I. (2012) Guidewire-Assisted Cannulation of the Common Bile Duct for the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, 12, Article CD009662.
[4]  Williams, E.J., Taylor, S., Fairclough, P., et al (2007) Are We Meeting the Standards Set for Endoscopy? Results of a Large-Scale Prospective Survey of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatograph Practice. Gut, 56, 821-829.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.097543
[5]  Liu, Y., Liu, W., Hong, J., et al. (2021) Causes and Countermeasures of Difficult Selective Biliary Cannulation: A Large Sample Size Retrospective Study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 31, 533-538.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000924
[6]  Friedland, S., Soetikno, R.M., et al. (2002) Bedside Scoring System to Predict the Risk of Developing Pancreatitis Following ERCP. Endoscopy, 34, 483-488.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32004
[7]  Dumonceau, J., Andriulli, A., et al. (2014) Prophylaxis of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—Updated June 2014. Endoscopy, 46, 799-815.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377875
[8]  Testoni, P., Mariani, A., et al. (2016) Papillary Cannulation and Sphincterotomy Techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. En-doscopy, 48, 657-683.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108641
[9]  Liao, W.C., Angsuwatcharakon, P., Isayama, H., et al. (2017) Interna-tional Consensus Recommendations for Difficult Biliary Access. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 85, 295-304.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.037
[10]  De Campos, S.T., Papaefthymiou, A., Florou, T., et al. (2023) The Impact of Center and Endoscopist ERCP Volume on ERCP Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gas-trointestinal Endoscopy, 98, 306-315.
[11]  Johnson, G., Webster, G., Bo?koski, I., et al. (2021) Curriculum for ERCP and Endoscopic Ultrasound Training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy, 53, 1071-1087.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1537-8999
[12]  Lekkerkerker, S.J. and Voermans, R.P. (2023) EUS and ERCP Training in Europe: Time for Simulation, Optimization, and Standardization. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 11, 407-409.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12399
[13]  Saito, H., Kadono, Y., et al. (2022) Factors Predicting Difficult Biliary Cannulation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones. Clinical Endos-copy, 55, 263-269.
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.153
[14]  Cotton, P.B. (2002) Income and Outcome Metrics for the Objective Eval-uation of ERCP and Alternative Methods. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 56, S283-S290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70026-6
[15]  Olsson, G., Arnelo, U., Swahn, F., et al. (2017) The H.O.U.S.E. Classification: A Novel Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Complexity Grading Scale. BMC Gastroenterology, 17, Article No. 38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0583-z
[16]  Cotton, P.B., Eisen, G., Romagnuolo, J., et al. (2011) Grading the Complexity of Endoscopic Procedures: Results of an ASGE Working Party. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 73, 868-874.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036
[17]  Dumonceau, J.-M., Kapral, C., Aabakken, L., et al. (2020) ERCP-Related Adverse Events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy, 52, 127-149.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1075-4080
[18]  Rustagi, T. and Jamidar, P.A. (2015) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Adverse Events: General Overview. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 25, 97-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2015.07.001
[19]  Aykut, H., Ak, C., et al. (2022) Post-ERCP Complication Analysis of an Experienced Center. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 32, 707-713.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001113
[20]  Sharma, Z.D. and Puri, R. (2023) Quality Indicators in En-doscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Brief Review of Established Guidelines. Clinical Endoscopy, 56, 290-297.
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.210
[21]  Akshintala, V.S., Kanthasamy, K., Bhullar, F.A., et al. (2023) Incidence, Severity, and Mortality of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 145 Randomized Controlled Trials. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 98, 1-6, E12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.023
[22]  Takenaka, M. and Kudo, M. (2022) Usefulness of the Dou-ble-Guidewire Technique for Endoscopic Procedures in the Field of Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases. Clinical Endoscopy, 55, 605-614.
[23]  Angsuwatcharakon, P., Rerknimitr, R., Ridtitid, W., et al. (2012) Success Rate and Cannulation Time between Precut Sphincterotomy and Double-Guidewire Technique in Truly Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 27, 356-361.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06927.x
[24]  Laquière, A., Privat, J., Jacques, J., et al. (2022) Early Double-Guidewire versus Repeated Single-Guidewire Technique to Facili-tate Selective Bile Duct Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Endoscopy, 54, 120-127.
[25]  Tse, F., Yuan, Y., Moayyedi, P., et al. (2017) Double-Guidewire Technique in Difficult Biliary Cannulation for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endoscopy, 49, 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-119035
[26]  Guzmán-Calderón, E., Martinez-Moreno, B., Casellas, J.A., et al. (2021) Transpancreatic Precut Papillotomy versus Double-Guidewire Technique in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Sys-tematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endoscopy International Open, 9, E1758-E1767.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1534-2388
[27]  Wang, X., Luo, H., Luo, B., et al. (2021) Combination Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Patients Undergoing Double-Guidewire Assisted Biliary Cannulation: A Case-Control Study with Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatol-ogy, 36, 1905-1912.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15402
[28]  Hakuta, R., Hamada, T., Nakai, Y., et al. (2019) Early Pancreatic Stent Placement in Wire-Guided Biliary Cannulation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 34, 1116-1122.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14453
[29]  李谦益, 姚文飞, 祁洋, 等. 胰管支架表面括约肌预切开在ERCP困难胆管插管中的应用效果[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2022, 34(3): 129-133.
[30]  Felux, J., Sturm, E., Busch, A., et al. (2017) ERCP in Infants, Children and Adolescents Is Feasible and Safe: Results from A Tertiary Care Center. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 5, 1024-1029.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640616687868
[31]  Barakat, M.T., Girotra, M., Huang, R.J., et al. (2021) Goff Sep-totomy Is a Safe and Effective Salvage Biliary Access Technique Following Failed Cannulation at ERCP. Digestive Dis-eases and Sciences, 66, 866-872.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06124-6
[32]  Canena, J., Lopes, L., Fernandes, J., et al. (2021) Efficacy and Safety of Primary, Early and Late Needle-Knife Fistulotomy for Biliary Access. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 16658.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96142-9
[33]  Sundaralingam, P., Masson, P. and Bourke, M.J. (2015) Early Precut Sphincterotomy Does Not Increase Risk during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Difficult Biliary Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepa-tology, 13, 1722-1729, E2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.035
[34]  Chen, J., Wan, J.H., Wu, D.Y., et al. (2018) Assessing Quality of Precut Sphincterotomy in Patients with Difficult Biliary Access: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 52, 573-578.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001077
[35]  Maharshi, S. and Sharma, S.S. (2021) Early Precut versus Primary Precut Sphincterotomy to Reduce Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Randomized Controlled Trial (with Videos). Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy, 93, 586-593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.064
[36]  Vargas, C.G. (2012) [ERCP: Ampulotomy or Suprapapillary Fistu-lotomy with Needle-Knife to Access Bile Duct in Difficult Cannulation]. Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru: Organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru, 32, 371-380.
[37]  Wen, J., Li, T., Lu, Y., et al. (2019) Compari-son of Efficacy and Safety of Transpancreatic Septotomy, Needle-Knife Fistulotomy or Both Based on Biliary Cannula-tion Unintentional Pancreatic Access and Papillary Morphology. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 18, 73-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.11.007
[38]  Jang, S.I., Kim, D.U., Cho, J.H., et al. (2020) Primary Needle-Knife Fistulotomy versus Conventional Cannulation Method in a High-Risk Cohort of Post-Endoscopic Retro-grade Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115, 616-624.
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000480
[39]  Lopes, L., Dinis-Ribeiro, M. and Rolanda, C. (2016) Gaining Competence in Needle-Knife Fistulotomy—Can I Begin on My Own? Endoscopy International Open, 4, E383-E388.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-109399
[40]  Pécsi, D., Farkas, N., Hegyi, P., et al. (2017) Transpancreatic Sphinc-terotomy Has a Higher Cannulation Success Rate than Needle-Knife Precut Papillotomy—A Meta-Analysis. Endoscopy, 49, 874-887.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-111717
[41]  Sugiyama, H., Tsuyuguchi, T., Sakai, Y., et al. (2018) Transpancreatic Precut Papillotomy versus Double-Guidewire Technique in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: Prospective Randomized Study. Endoscopy, 50, 33-39.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118000
[42]  Facciorusso, A., Ramai, D., Gkolfakis, P., et al. (2022) Comparative Efficacy of Different Methods for Difficult Biliary Cannulation in ERCP: Systematic Review and Network Me-ta-Analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 95, 60-71, E12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.010
[43]  Lo, M.H., Lin, C.H., Wu, C.H. et al. (2021) Management of Biliary Diseases after the Failure of Initial Needle Knife Precut Sphincterotomy for Biliary Cannulation. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 14968.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94361-8
[44]  Colan-Hernandez, J., Aldana, A., Concepción, M., et al. (2017) Optimal Timing for a Second ERCP after Failure of Initial Biliary Cannulation Following Precut Sphincterotomy: An Analysis of Experience at Two Tertiary Centers. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 31, 3711-3717.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5410-z
[45]  Kim, J., Ryu, J.K., Ahn, D.W., et al. (2012) Results of Repeat Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography after Initial Biliary Cannulation Failure Following Nee-dle-Knife Sphincterotomy. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 27, 516-520.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06914.x
[46]  Moole, H., Bechtold, M.L., Forcione, D., et al. (2017) A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review: Success of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Stenting in Patients with In-operable Malignant Biliary Strictures and a Failed ERCP. Medicine, 96, e5154.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005154
[47]  Baniya, R., Upadhaya, S., Madala, S., et al. (2017) Endo-scopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage after Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 10, 67-74.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S132004
[48]  Bokemeyer, A., Müller, F., Niesert, H., et al. (2019) Percutane-ous-Transhepatic-Endoscopic Rendezvous Procedures Are Effective and Safe in Patients with Refractory Bile Duct Ob-struction. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7, 397-404.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640619825949
[49]  Tsou, Y.-K., Pan, K.-T., Lee, M.-H., et al. (2022) Endoscopic Salvage Therapy after Failed Biliary Cannulation Using Advanced Techniques: A Concise Review. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 28, 3803-3813.
https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3803
[50]  Dhir, V., Shah, R. and Udawat, P. (2022) Endoscopic Ultra-sound-Guided Biliary Interventions. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 32, 507-525.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2022.02.003
[51]  Minaga, K. and Kitano, M. (2018) Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage. Digestive Endoscopy, 30, 38-47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12910
[52]  Dhir, V., Artifon, E.L.A., Gupta, K., et al. (2014) Multicenter Study on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Expandable Biliary Metal Stent Placement: Choice of Access Route, Direction of Stent Insertion, and Drainage Route. Digestive Endoscopy, 26, 430-435.
https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12153
[53]  Iwashita, T., Uemura, S., Yoshida, K., et al. (2018) EUS-Guided Hybrid Rendezvous Technique as Salvage for Standard Rendez-vous with Intra-Hepatic Bile Duct Approach. PLOS ONE, 13, e0202445.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202445
[54]  Van Der Merwe, S.W., Van Wanrooij, R.L.J., Bronswijk, M., et al. (2022) Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. En-doscopy, 54, 185-205.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1717-1391
[55]  Vila, J.J., Pérez-Miranda, M., Vazquez-Sequeiros, E., et al. (2012) Initial Experience with EUS-Guided Cholangiopancreatography for Biliary and Pancreatic Duct Drainage: A Spanish National Survey. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 76, 1133-1141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.001
[56]  Yang, M., Kim, J., et al. (2017) Usefulness of Combined Percutaneous-Endoscopic Rendezvous Techniques after Failed Therapeu-tic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography in the Era of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Rendezvous. Medicine, 96, e8991.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008991
[57]  Katanuma, A. and Isayama, H. (2014) Current Status of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy in Japan: Question-naire Survey and Important Discussion Points at Endoscopic Forum Japan 2013. Digestive Endoscopy, 26, 109-115.
https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12247
[58]  Parlak, E., Ci?ek, B., Di?ibeyaz, S., et al. (2010) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography by Double Balloon Enteroscopy in Patients with Roux-En-Y Hepaticojejunostomy. Surgical Endosco-py, 24, 466-470.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0591-3
[59]  Inamdar, S., Slattery, E., Sejpal, D.V., et al. (2015) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP in Patients with Surgically Altered GI Anat-omy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 82, 9-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.013

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133