全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

算法推荐模式下网络平台的行为责任研究——以A公司为例
Research on Behavioral Responsibility of Network Platform under Algorithm Recommendation Model—Taking Company A as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.123242, PP. 1689-1695

Keywords: 个性化推荐,避风港原则,主观过错,惩罚性赔偿
Personalized Recommendation
, Safe Haven Principle, Subjective Fault, Punitive Damages

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在短视频的间接侵权之中,作为短视频网络平台的核心技术方法——个性化推荐算法的介入,带来了更高的侵权风险和侵权形式。对于平台援引“避风港原则”的正当性也备受质疑。其主要原因是算法推荐模式下,网络平台的主观过错认定标准模糊。本文重点分析网络平台的主观过错责任,其通过理论与司法实践为依据去合理拓宽“明知”的适用范围,以此提高平台间接侵权的认定的可能性,更有利于平衡平台与权利人之间的关系。其次对平台的惩罚性赔偿适用问题,为了避免加重平台的经济负担,应该严格按照“故意 + 情节严重”构成要件。而且从利益平衡和技术可能性角度来看,数字推荐模式下的平台应该承担更高的注意义务,采取必要措施去预防和制止侵权行为的发生。
In the indirect infringement of short video, the intervention of personalized recommendation algorithm, which is the core technology of short video network platforms, brings higher infringement risk and infringement forms. The legitimacy of the platform’s invocation of the “safe haven principle” has also been questioned. The main reason is that the subjective fault identification standard of network platform is fuzzy under the algorithm recommendation model. This paper focuses on the analysis of the subjective fault liability of the network platform, which reasonably broadens the scope of application of “knowing” through theory and judicial practice, so as to improve the possibility of determining the indirect infringement of the platform, and is more conducive to balancing the relationship between the platform and the right holder. Secondly, the application of punitive damages to the platform, in order to avoid increasing the economic burden of the platform, should be strictly in accordance with the “intentional + serious circumstances” that constitute the elements. Moreover, from the perspective of interest balance and technical possibility, the platform under the digital recommendation model should bear a higher duty of care and take necessary measures to prevent and stop the occurrence of infringement.

References

[1]  裁判文书网[EB/OL]. https://wenshu.court.gov.cn, 2023-05-06.
[2]  熊皓钰. 网络平台推荐算法致著作权间接侵权责任研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2022.
[3]  李洋. 算法时代的网络侵权救济规则: 反思与重构——以“通知 + 取下”规则的类型化为中心[J]. 南京社会科学, 2020(2): 110-115.
[4]  王迁. 信息网络传播权保护条例中“避风港”规则的效力[J]. 法学, 2010(6): 128-140.
[5]  王迁. 网络环境中的著作权保护研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011: 148.
[6]  王泽鉴. 侵权行为[M]. 第3版. 北京: 北京大学出版社.2016: 298-299.
[7]  史尚宽. 债法总论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 112.
[8]  邓宏光. 信息流推荐服务提供者的行为定性——兼评《延禧攻略》案[J]. 中国版权, 2022(3): 10-16.
[9]  蒋华胜. 知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度研究:立法检视与司法适用——兼论我国《民法典》第1185条法律规范的体系化构建[J]. 中国应用法学, 2021(1): 146-170.
[10]  高敏. 算法推荐模式下短视频平台责任问题的研究[J]. 知识产权家, 2022(6), 22-25.
[11]  闫姝. 算法推荐技术背景下网络服务提供者著作权侵权注意义务研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2022.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133