|
论个人信息网络侵权损害赔偿范围及标准
|
Abstract:
随着大数据时代的到来,我们一边享受着信息时代高速发展为我们带来的生活便利,一边也深受个人信息泄露所带来的各种问题困扰。数不胜数的骚扰电话、推销电话,层出不穷的电信诈骗手段等严重侵犯了公民的个人权益,同时影响社会安定。随着《个人信息保护法》的正式出台,从法律层面遏制了个人信息网络侵权行为的发生,但是对于遭受个人信息网络侵权后该获得什么样的赔偿及赔偿标准亟待理清。本文就个人信息网络侵权损害赔偿的范围及认定标准展开讨论,得出个人信息网络侵权损害赔偿的范围应包括财产损害赔偿和精神损害赔偿。财产损害赔偿应包括直接经济损失和间接经济损失,其赔偿标准应当以实际损失和侵权人获利作为衡量;精神损害赔偿的标准要以实际产生的个人信息网络侵权行为作为考量因素,而不是笼统地以“严重”作为依据,可考虑引入最低和最高赔偿标准,以具体方法让损害赔偿的计算客观化、统一化,最终实现对被侵权人的有效救济。
With the advent of the era of big data, while enjoying the convenience of life brought by the rapid development of the information age, we are also deeply troubled by various problems brought by personal information leakage. An endless stream of harassing phone calls, sales calls, and endless telecom fraud methods have seriously violated the individual rights and interests of citizens and affected social stability. With the official introduction of the Personal Information Protection Law, how to curb the infringement of personal information from the legal level has become a problem that people expect and pay attention to, especially what kind of compensation and compensation standards should be clarified after suffering from the infringement of personal information. This paper focuses on the scope and identification criteria of personal information network infringement damages, and concludes that the scope of personal information network infringement damages includes property damage compensation and spiritual damage compensation, property damage compensation should include direct economic losses and indirect economic losses, and the compensation standard should be measured by the actual losses and the profit of everyone who infringes. The standard of compensation for mental damage should take the actual infringement of personal information network as a consideration factor, rather than taking “serious” as a basis in the past, considering the introduction of minimum and maximum compensation standards, and using specific methods to make the calculation of damage compensation objective and unified, and finally achieve effective relief for the infringed.
[1] | 齐爱民. 个人信息保护法研究[J]. 河北法学, 2008(4): 15-33. |
[2] | 王利明. 论个人信息权在人格权法中的地位[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2012(6): 68. |
[3] | 杨立新. 个人信息: 法益抑或民事权利——对《民法总则》第111条规定的“个人信息”之解读[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(1): 34-45. |
[4] | 程海玲. 个人信息侵权风险性损害的证成与认定[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(5): 198-211. |
[5] | 林匀杰. 个人信息侵权问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2022. |
[6] | 郭锋, 陈龙业, 贾玉慧, 张音. 《关于审理使用人脸识别技术处理个人信息相关民事案件适用法律若干问题的规定》的理解与适用[J]. 人民司法, 2021(25): 37-42. |
[7] | 杨立新. 侵害个人信息权益损害赔偿的规则与适用——《个人信息保护法》第69条的关键词释评[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2022, 37(1): 1-15. |
[8] | 曲一帆. 金融消费者保护法律制度比较研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2011: 51. |
[9] | 王磊, 赵春艳. 论完全赔偿原则的演进与走向[J]. 海峡法学, 2023, 25(1): 102. |
[10] | 康竟之. 网络环境下个人信息权的侵权责任研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政治青年学院, 2015: 21. |