全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Seismology in the Light of Fundamental Sciences

DOI: 10.4236/ojer.2024.131004, PP. 84-112

Keywords: Seismology, Earthquake, Fundamental Laws of Science

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

According to the definition, seismology is a science that studies the processes and causes of seismic phenomena and the structure of the Earth, i.e. a scientific discipline that studies the movement of blocks of rocks of the Earth’s crust and mantle and related phenomena. Seismology conducts research in the following areas and is designed to scientifically explain two main issues: 1) Study of the nature of seismic phenomena and the internal structure of the Earth. Why, how and where do seismic impacts occur? 2) Protecting humanity from the catastrophic consequences of seismic events. Is it possible to predict seismic impacts? Like any other scientific discipline, seismology is obliged to follow the laws of science and its fundamental principles. This article is devoted to the description of violations of the fundamental laws of science committed by seismologists in the study of seismic processes and raises the question of compliance of the stated research directions with the current level of development of sciences. Answering point No. 1, regarding the structure of the Earth, it is possible to recognize some successes of seismology, which nevertheless cause great doubts in the scientific community of geophysicists, because if the stratigraphic data of ultra-deep wells often refute[1] the conclusions made by seismologists on the structure of the Earth’s crust at shallow depth, then to assert something unambiguously about the structure of the mantle and at the present stage, seismology cannot. Answering the main questions of seismology, why seismic phenomena occur, and how earthquake energy is formed, seismologists have not had, and have not. Answering point No. 2, we can confidently say that in the matter of forecasting seismic phenomena, seismology has not advanced one iota over the past century, and as seismologists have been confused in the search for earthquake prediction algorithms, they are also confused without any hope of success. All that modern seismology can “boast” is the theory of Elastic recoil

References

[1]  The Kola Super-Deep (1998) Scientific Results and Research Experiments. M.
https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/4172/
[2]  Reid, H.F. (1910) The Elastic-Rebound Theory of Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Department of Geology, University of California Publications, 6, 413-444.
[3]  Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Alfred Wegener”. Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alfred-Wegener
[4]  Reddy, J.N. (2007) An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 244.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800894
[5]  Bychkov, S. (2020) Seismic Processes in the Light of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Evolution of the Universe.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3521526
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521526
[6]  Love, E.H. (1927) A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[7]  Bychkov, S. (2019) Nature and Energy of Earthquakes or Seismology for Dummies.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3498647
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3498647
[8]  Kay, J.J. (1999) Application of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and Le Chatelier’s Principle to the Developing Ecosystem. In: Muller, F., Ed., Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management. Environmental & Ecological (Math) Modeling, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1180.
[9]  Bohr Atomic Model.
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/bohr_atom.html
[10]  Joseph, H. Encyclopædia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Henry
[11]  Semenov, N.N. (1956) Some Problems Relating to Chain Reactions and to the Theory of Combustion. Nobel Lecture, December 11.
[12]  Buchachenko, A.L. (2014) Magnetoplasticity and Physics of Earthquakes. Is It Possible to Prevent a Catastrophe? Journal of Successes of Physical Sciences, 184, 101-108.
https://ufn.ru/ru/articles/2014/1/e/
https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0184.201401e.0101
[13]  Bychkov, S.V. (2020) Why Do Earthquakes Happen? Ask Plumbers!
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3521576
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521576
[14]  
https://inconsulting.com.ua/gost/gost-25.503-97.pdf
[15]  Gorshkov, G.P. (1984) Regional Seismotectonics of the South of the USSR. Alpine Belt. Nauka, Moscow, 272 р.
[16]  Rebetskiy, Y.L. (2008) The Current State of Earthquake Prediction Theories. Results of the Assessment of Natural Stresses and a New Model of the Earthquake Source. The Journal Problems of Tectonophysics, 5, 92-100.
[17]  Aki, K. and Richards, P. (2002) Quantitative Seismology.
https://www.academia.edu/37326301/AkiRichards_QuantitativeSeismology
[18]  Sawicki, M. (1999) Myths about Gravity and Tides. The Physics Teacher, 37, 438-441.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880345
[19]  Gufeld, I.L., Matveeva, M.I. and Novoselov, O.N. (2002) Why Cannot We Make a Forecast of Strong Crustal Earthquakes? Geodinamics @ Tectonophysics Magazine.
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pochemu-my-ne-mozhem-osuschestvit-prognoz-silnyh-korovyh-zemletryaseniy/viewer
[20]  Kanamori, H. (2003) 72—Earthquake Prediction: An Overview. International Geophysics, 81, 1205-1216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(03)80186-9
https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/pdf/download/eid/1-s2.0-S0074614203801869/first-page-pdf
[21]  Geller, R.J., Jackson, D.D., Kagan, Y.Y. and Mulargia, F. (1997) Earthquakes Cannot Be Predicted. Science, 275, Article 1616.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1616
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/275/5306/1616
[22]  Rebetskiy, Y.L. (2011) Current State of Theories of Earthquake Prediction. Natural Stress Assessment Results and a New Earthquake Source Model.
http://yak.ifz.ru/pdf-lib-yak/Pages359-395.pdf
[23]  Litovchenko, I.N. (2021) On the Types of Earthquake Sources, Their Models and Formation.
http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/texsts/rus/stat/st4977.pdf
[24]  Bychkov, S. (2020) Earthquake Forecast and Niels Bohr Postulates.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3535714
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3535714
[25]  Bychkov, S. (2021) Earthquake Prediction Is a Feeding Ground for Charlatans and Crooks?
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3873514
[26]  Bychkov, S. (2022) About Earthquake Prediction.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4311303
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4311303
[27]  Main, I. (1999) Is the Reliable Prediction of Individual Earthquakes a Realistic Scientific Goal? Nature.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature28107
https://www.nature.com/nature/debates/earthquake/equake_frameset.html
[28]  Lebedev, P.I. (1927) Leninakan Earthquake 22.10.1926. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series VI, 21, 887-912.
[29]  Robinson, D. and Denning, J. (2010) The Franck-Hertz Experiment.
https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~robinson/labs/franck_hertz.pdf
[30]  Savelyev I.V. (1980) Physics A General Course (In Three Volumes) Volume Ii Electricity and Magnetism Waves Optics. MIR Publishers, Moscow.
https://ia600402.us.archive.org/18/items/SavelyevPhysicsGeneralCourseVol2/I-V-Savelyev-Physics-General-Course-Vol-2.pdf
[31]  Magnetostriction. Why Does the Transformer Hum?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/magstrict.html

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133