全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

自洗钱行为独立成罪的合理性研究
A Study on the Rationality of Independently Criminalizing Self Money Laundering Behavior

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.122159, PP. 1090-1096

Keywords: 自洗钱行为,法益,本犯
Self Money Laundering Behavior
, Legal Interests, This Offense

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“自洗钱行为”是“他洗钱行为”的对称,在我国是指涉毒、涉黑、涉恐等罪行的本犯对其所获得的犯罪所得及收益进行“洗白”的活动。刑法修正案十一正式实施以后,自洗钱行为独立成罪。本文的研究主旨是对自洗钱行为独立成罪的合理性进行证成,对自洗钱行为的入罪分析提供正当化根据是本文的研究目的。本文主要采用了法解释学和比较研究的法学研究方法,从理论意义与实践意义两个角度对自洗钱行为独立成罪进行了证成。从理论意义上来看,本文得出了如下三个结论:首先是自洗钱行为与上游犯罪不存在牵连关系,其次是自洗钱行为并非不罚的后行为,再次是自洗钱行为人不具备期待可能性;从实践意义的角度来看,自洗钱行为独立成罪为我国打击洗钱犯罪提供了助力,维护了我国国家司法主权。
“Self money laundering behavior” is a symmetry of “other money laundering behavior”, which in China refers to the activity of the principal offender of drug-related, black related, terrorism related crimes to “whitewash” the criminal proceeds and profits obtained. After the official implementation of the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law, money laundering has become an independent crime. The main purpose of this study is to prove the rationality of the independent criminalization of self money laundering behavior, and to provide a legitimate basis for the criminalization analysis of self money laundering behavior. This article mainly adopts legal hermeneutics and comparative research methods to prove the independent criminalization of self money laundering from both theoretical and practical perspectives. From a theoretical perspective, this article draws the following three conclusions: firstly, there is no connection between self money laundering behavior and upstream crimes; secondly, self money laundering behavior is not an unpunished post behavior; thirdly, the self money laundering perpetrator does not have the possibility of expectation; From a practical perspective, the independent criminalization of self money laundering has provided assistance to China in combating money laundering crimes and safeguarded our national sovereignty.

References

[1]  扈小刚, 姜聪. 论洗钱的犯罪对象与罪数认定——以走私犯罪案件中洗钱罪为视角[J]. 中国检察官, 2021(22): 24-27.
[2]  齐文远. 刑法学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015.
[3]  赵学敏. 虚拟货币视角下自洗钱行为应独立成罪[J]. 北方金融, 2020(6): 61-66.
[4]  梁淼. 论自我洗钱行为的法律定性[J]. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2020, 30(2): 25-28.
[5]  贾学胜. 事后不可罚行为研究[J]. 现代法学, 2011, 33(5): 77-84.
[6]  周光权. 刑法各论讲义[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003: 430.
[7]  张丽卿. 刑法总则理论与运用[M]. 台北: 台湾神州图书出版有限公司, 2003: 409.
[8]  黄荣坚. 基础刑法学(下) [M]. 台北: 元照出版有限公司, 2004: 430.
[9]  张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 368-369.
[10]  姚兵. 我国自洗钱行为不独立成罪的原因分析[J]. 河北法学, 2012, 30(6): 116-117.
[11]  陈侃. 不可期待性之思[J]. 检察风云, 2020(17): 68-69.
[12]  霍布斯. 利维坦[M]. 黎思复, 黎延弼, 译. 杨昌裕, 校. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.
[13]  王新. 自洗钱入罪的意义与司法适用[N]. 检察日报, 2021-03-25(003).
[14]  张明楷. 洗钱罪的保护法益[J]. 法学, 2022(5): 69-83.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133