|
Dispute Settlement 2024
自甘风险适用标准研究
|
Abstract:
《中华人民共和国民法典》第一千一百七十六条正式确立了我国制定法上的自甘风险规则。该条文明确了自甘风险规则的适用条件,但在适用范围和构成要件上仍存在理解和适用的争议。本文着重对自甘风险规则的适用范围和构成要件进行研究,认为应当对适用范围做限缩解释,并支持自甘风险规则的构成要件包括受害人认识到风险、受害人自愿冒险、损害因固有风险而引起和加害人主观不存在故意或重大过失。
Article 1,176 of the Civil Code formally establishes the assumption of risk in the formulation of law in China. This article clarifies the application conditions of assumption of risk, but there are still disputes on the scope and components of application. This paper focuses on the study of the scope of application and constitutive elements of the assumption of risk, and be-lieves that the scope of application should be interpreted in a limited way, and the constitutive elements supporting the assumption of risk include the victim’s awareness of the risk, the victim’s voluntary risk, the damage caused by the inherent risk, and the perpetrator’s subjective is not intention or gross negligence.
[1] | 贺光辉. 论自甘风险规则在侵权责任法中的有限适用[J]. 长江师范学院学报, 2020, 36(2): 113-120. |
[2] | 韩勇. 《民法典》中的体育自甘风险[J]. 体育与科学, 2020, 41(4): 13-26. |
[3] | 杨立新. 自甘风险: 本土化的概念定义、类型结构与法律适用——以白银山地马拉松越野赛体育事故为视角[J]. 东方法学, 2021(4): 107-120. |
[4] | 谭佐财. 论《民法典》中自甘冒险规则的司法适用[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 39(1): 52-59. |
[5] | 王利明. 论受害人自甘冒险[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(2): 1-12. |
[6] | 刘茂梁, 刘清宇. 论《民法典》中自甘风险的适用范围与认定标准——基于92份判决的实证考察[J]. 盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 43(4): 47-55. |
[7] | 李鼎. 论自甘风险的适用范围: 与过失相抵、受害人同意的关系[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报, 2021(1): 128-143. |
[8] | 杜丽萍. 浅析自甘风险[J]. 山西警察学院学报, 2021, 29(3): 27-30. |