Opportunities to Improve the Quality of Environmental Reports and the Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case of Electric Power Transmission Systems in Brazil
A good quality Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is key for the effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) processes and consequently to the acceptability of projects subject to EIA. The international literature has contributed to the understanding of the essential aspects to be verified regarding the quality of EIS, offering a wide spectrum of good practice examples related to the content of the studies. Even so, there is a need for empirical studies that allow the identification of specific aspects related to the context of application of the EIS, which could lead to the identification of opportunities to improve both the quality of the reports and also the effectiveness of EIA. Therefore, the present paper is focused on the quality review of a number of EIS submitted to the Brazilian Federal Environmental Agency (Ibama) to instruct the assessment of electric power transmission systems. Based on the application of the EIS quality review package as proposed by Lee and Colley (1992), the outcomes reveal opportunities for improving the scope of EIA, analysis of alternatives, prediction of magnitude and the assessment of impact significance. Finally, the development and/or adaptation of a similar tool for the systematic review of the quality of EIA reports is recommended.
References
[1]
Zhang, J., Kørnøv, L. and Christensen, P. (2013) Critical Factors for EIA Implementation: Literature Review and Research Options. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030
[2]
Sadler, B. (1996) International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment: Final Report: Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and IAIA, Ottawa. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.834209/publication.html
[3]
Morgan, R.K. (2012) Environmental Impact Assessment: The State of the Art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
[4]
Phylip-Jones, J. and Fischer, T.B. (2013) EIA for Wind Farms in the United Kingdom and Germany. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 15, 1340008-1-1340008-30. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333213400085
[5]
Sandham, L.A. and Pretorius, H.M. (2008) A Review of EIA Report Quality in the North West Province of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.002
[6]
de Almeida, A.N., et al. (2016) Principais deficiências dos Estudos de Impacto Ambiental. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 3, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.21438/rbgas.030401
[7]
Aversa, I.C. (2018) Avaliação de impacto ambiental aplicada a projetos de geração de energia eólica: O caso do Estado do Ceará. Master’s Dissertation, University of São Paulo, São Carlos.
[8]
Ministério Público Federal (2004) Deficiências em estudos de impacto ambiental: Síntese de uma experiência. https://biblioteca.mpf.mp.br/repositorio/items/9fe8ce42-5f3f-4acc-b6e7-5a416006bc1e
[9]
Veronez, F. and Montaño, M. (2017) Análise da qualidade dos estudos de impacto ambiental no estado do Espírito Santo (2007-2013). Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 43, 6-21. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v43i0.54180
[10]
Anifowose, B., Lawler, D.M., van der Horst, D. and Chapman, L. (2016) A Systematic Quality Assessment of Environmental Impact Statements in the Oil and Gas Industry. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.083
[11]
Meio Ambiente (2020) Organograma. https://antigo.mma.gov.br/o-ministerio/organograma.html
[12]
Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2011). Portaria 421, de 26 de Outubro de 2011. https://www.ibama.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view=legislacao&legislacao=124563
[13]
CONAMA (1986) Resolução Conama no 001, de 23 de Janeiro de 1986. Diário Oficial da União, Section I, 2548-2549. https://www.ibama.gov.br/sophia/cnia/legislacao/MMA/RE0001-230186.PDF
[14]
CONAMA (1997) Resolução Conama no 237, de 19 de Dezembro de 1997. Diário Oficial da União, Section I, 644-652. https://conama.mma.gov.br/?option=com_sisconama&task=arquivo.download&id=237
[15]
ONS (2016) Plano da operação energética 2016-2020. https://www.ons.org.br/AcervoDigitalDocumentosEPublicacoes/PEN2016_SumarioExecutivo.pdf
[16]
Presidência da República (2011) Lei Complementar no 140, de 8 de Dezembro de 2011. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp140.htm
[17]
Ministério de Minas e Energia (2015) Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia Ten-Year Energy Expansion Plan. https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-45/topico-79/Sum%C3%A1rio%20Executivo%20do%20PDE%202024.pdf
[18]
Sánchez, L.E. (2013) Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental: Conceitos e métodos. 2nd Edition, Oficina de Textos, São Paulo.
[19]
Veronez, F.A. (2018) Efetividade da avaliação de impacto ambiental de projetos no Estado do Espírito Santo. Ph.D. Thesis, University of São Paulo, São Carlos.
[20]
Lee, N. and Colley, R. (1992) Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements. EIA Centre, Manchester, Occasional Paper No. 24.
[21]
McGrath, C. and Bond, A. (1997) The Quality of Environmental Impact Statements: A Review of Those Submitted in Cork, Eire from 1988-1993. Project Appraisal, 12, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1997.9727037
[22]
Demori, V.A., Almeida, M.R.R.E. and Montaño, M. (2018) Alterações no Licenciamento Ambiental Federal de Sistemas de Transmissão de Energia Elétrica. 4o Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação de Impacto, Associação Brasileira de Avaliação de Impacto, Fortaleza, 492-498. https://avaliacaodeimpacto.org.br/anais-do-congresso-brasileiro-de-avaliacao-de-impacto-cbai18/
