|
Dispute Settlement 2024
醉驾型危险驾驶罪的出罪路径探究
|
Abstract:
醉驾入刑在很大程度上提高了社会公众对醉酒驾驶行为严重危害性的认知,引起了公众对交通领域公共安全的重视,推动了公众对交通规则的遵守。然而,基于对刑法谦抑性原则的遵守、刑事司法资源的考量以及醉驾行为所带来一系列软制裁后果的影响,醉驾行为不能一律入罪,必须为醉驾行为保留一定的出罪空间与路径。为此,醉驾型危险驾驶罪的犯罪构成要件以及《刑法》第13条规定的但书条款,提供了一些可行的出罪路径与应对思路。
To a great extent, the criminal conviction of drunk driving has improved the public’s awareness of the serious harm of drunk driving, aroused the public’s attention to the public safety in the field of traffic, and promoted the public’s compliance with traffic rules. However, due to the compliance with the principle of modesty in criminal law, the consideration of criminal justice resources and the impact of a series of soft sanctions brought by drunk driving behavior, drunk driving behavior cannot be criminalized uniformly, and a certain space and path must be reserved for drunk driving behavior. Therefore, the elements of the crime of drunk driving type dangerous driving and the proviso clause stipulated in Article 13 of the Criminal Law provide some feasible ways to commit the crime and countermeasures.
[1] | 张明楷. 论刑法的谦抑性[J]. 法商研究(中南政法学院学报), 1995(4): 55-62. |
[2] | 周光权. 论刑事一体化视角的危险驾驶罪[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 14-30. |
[3] | 张明楷. 实质解释论的再提倡[J]. 中国法学, 2010(4): 49-69. |
[4] | 何群, 康志雄. 危险驾驶罪之出罪研究: 从新康德主义的视角[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 40(4): 47-55. |
[5] | 王志祥, 融昊. 醉驾行为出罪路径的刑法教义学阐释[J]. 北方法学, 2022, 16(1): 66-78. |
[6] | 李翔. 从“但书”条款适用看司法如何遵循立法[J]. 法学, 2011(7): 22-26. |
[7] | 刘宪权, 周舟. 《刑法》第13条“但书”条款司法适用相关问题研究——兼论醉驾应否一律入罪[J]. 现代法学, 2011, 33(6): 99-106. |