|
Modern Linguistics 2024
《战国策》“自 + V”结构研究
|
Abstract:
上古汉语中“自 + V”结构出现频率较高,本文对《战国策》中的“自”进行定量分析,重点探讨“自”作反身代词时形成的“自 + V”结构。“自 + V”结构主要包含两种类型:一是主谓结构,二是动宾结构,“自”作宾语时宾语前置。同时,本文比较《战国策》时期与现代汉语中的“自 + V”,探讨其词汇化特征:“自”作代词时成词概率更高,并且动宾结构成词化程度远高于主谓结构;“V”相当于二价动词,有着两个论元;从语素分析,“自”与“V”间依然存在主谓与动宾关系;复合词“自 + V”沿用宾语前置句式,因此也含有强调宾语的意义。
The “自 + verb” format is usually observed in archaic Chinese. This study focuses on the quantification of the word “自” in Intrigues of the Warring States, with the emphasis on the “自 + verb” format in which “自” served as reflexive pronoun in the sentence. The “自 + verb” format can be divided into two separate categories: subject-predicate structures and verb-object structures. The word “自” will be prepositioned when it serves as the object. Meanwhile, this study compared the “自 + verb” format in Intrigues of the Warring States with those in the modern Chinese to investigate their linguistic features. The research revealed that “自” has a higher lexical probability when used as a pronoun, and verb-object structures are much more common than subject-predicate structures. The verb is inherently equivalent to the bivalent verb, which contains two arguments; In terms of morphemic analysis, there is still a subject-verb-object relationship between “自” and “V”; the compound word “自 + V” follows the object-antecedent syntax, and therefore also contains the sense of emphasizing the object.
[1] | (东汉)许慎. 说文解字[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2013: 68. |
[2] | 刘平. 古汉语中虚词“自”的语法化历程[J]. 兰州教育学院学报, 2006(2): 38-42+51. |
[3] | 李娟. 试论“自”字从古至今记录职能的演变[J]. 德州学院学报, 2014, 30(3): 73-76. |
[4] | 杨伯峻. 文言文法[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1963: 52. |
[5] | 马建忠. 马氏文通[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017: 53. |
[6] | 方心棣. 古汉语“自”字用法浅谈[J]. 安徽教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 1994(1): 83-85. |
[7] | 王力. 王力文集 第1卷[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 1984: 284. |
[8] | 陆美善. 浅谈“自V” [J]. 广西右江民族师专学报, 2003(1): 52-55. |
[9] | 王力. 王力文集 第11卷[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 1990: 275. |
[10] | 张利红, 段绪. 复合词“自+V”构式研究[J]. 绥化学院学报, 2020, 40(2): 93-96. |
[11] | 吕叔湘. 语文常谈[M]. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店, 2019. |
[12] | 张隽. 《春秋左传》“自+V”结构辨议[J]. 乐山师范学院学报, 2004(8): 15-17. |