全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

相邻关系的纠纷处理
The Dispute Resolution of Neighboring Relationships

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.121086, PP. 603-608

Keywords: 相邻关系,容忍义务,请求权基础,补偿与赔偿,免责事由
Neighboring Relationship
, Tolerance Obligation, Basis of Claim Rights, Compensation and Compensation, Exemption Reasons

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

现行法对相邻关系纠纷解决的规定存在欠缺。相邻关系纠纷的核心在于容忍义务,本文对容忍义务合理限度从理论学说上和司法实务中进行了分析确认。相邻关系纠纷的请求权基础包括物权请求权与侵权请求权,二者可择其一,也可竞合使用。相邻人为自己的必要利益导致相对方的权利受到限制或损失,相对方可以行使容忍义务补偿请求权。相邻人权利行使超出容忍义务的合理限度,并给权利人造成损失,权利人可以行使损害赔偿请求权。相邻关系侵害的司法衡量标准还包括是否违反法律法规、行业标准和公序良俗。同时,相邻关系侵害也存在着免责事由。
There is a lack of provisions in the current law regarding the resolution of disputes over neighboring relationships. The core of neighboring relationship disputes lies in the obligation to tolerate. This article analyzes and confirms the reasonable limit of the obligation to tolerate from theoretical theory and judicial practice. The basis of the right of claim in neighboring relationship disputes includes the right of property claim and the right of infringement claim, both of which can be chosen or used in conjunction. If the right of the other party is restricted or lost due to the necessary interests of the neighboring party, the other party may exercise the right of tolerance obligation to compensate. If the exercise of the rights of neighboring parties exceeds the reasonable limit of tolerance obligations and causes losses to the rights holder, the rights holder may exercise the right to claim compensation for damages. The judicial measurement standards for neighboring relationship infringement also include whether it violates laws and regulations, industry standards, and public order and good customs. At the same time, there are also exemptions for infringement of neighboring relationships.

References

[1]  王利明, 杨立新, 王轶, 程啸. 民法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
[2]  黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典物权编解读[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020.
[3]  韩光明. 《民法典》相邻关系规范的体系化构造: 兼论容忍补偿请求权的独立性[J]. 财经法学, 2022(5): 135-146.
[4]  焦富民. 容忍义务: 相邻权扩张与限制的基点——以不可量物侵扰制度为中心[J]. 政法论坛, 2013, 31(4): 113-120.
[5]  王利明. 物权法研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016.
[6]  蔡养军. 论相邻关系纠纷的法律适用[J]. 北方法学, 2016, 10(2): 5-16.
[7]  汪洋. 地下空间物权类型的再体系化——“卡一梅框架”视野下的建设用地使用权、地役权与相邻关系[J]. 中外法学, 2020, 32(5): 1377-1399.
[8]  陈华彬. 物权法原理[M]. 北京: 国家行政学院出版社, 1998.
[9]  赵晓舒. 采光、日照妨害的民事救济方式[J]. 法律适用, 2013(4): 35-38.
[10]  国家法官学院案例开发研究中心. 中国法院2012年度案例?物权纠纷[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2012.
[11]  杜月秋, 孙政. 民法典条文对照与重点解读[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
[12]  王保林. 论容忍义务在审理相邻关系纠纷中的运用[J]. 法律适用, 2009(7): 44-47.
[13]  王俊等. 相邻关系纠纷案件审判要旨[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133