|
四川盆地页岩气勘探开发过程中废物治理:现实、主体行为与优化
|
Abstract:
四川盆地是中国页岩气资源勘探开发的示范区,随着勘探开发力度的加大,生产过程中所产生废物不断增加,对区域内的环境承载能力提出了挑战,如何有效治理成为影响和制约页岩气资源勘探开发的关键。本文立足于四川盆地页岩气勘探开发过程中废物治理现状,从指导思想、发展方式到治理能力方面分析了其产生的原因,构建了政府、油田企业和第三方服务企业的三方演化博弈模型,系统分析其行为演化规律,提出治理优化对策。研究发现:一是现有的页岩气勘探开发废物治理模式存在主导思想与绿色发展理念、发展方式与可持续发展思想、废物处理能力与现实需求的三重矛盾;二是基于政府、油田企业、第三方废物治理企业三个关键主体行为博弈的最优稳定策略是(弱监管、积极治理、重视补贴)。因此,树立正确的治理理念,重塑科学治理方式,创新治理技术将有利于四川盆地页岩气勘探开发废物治理效能的提高,有利于资源开发与环境保护的统一。
Sichuan Basin is a demonstration area of shale gas exploration and development in China. With the increase of exploration and development efforts, the waste generated in the production process continues to increase, which poses a challenge to the environmental carrying capacity of the region. How to effectively control the waste has become the key to influence and restrict the exploration and development of shale gas resources. Based on the current situation of waste treatment during shale gas exploration and development in Sichuan Basin, this paper analyzes the causes of waste treatment from the aspects of guiding ideology, development mode and treatment ability, constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model of government, oilfield enterprises and third-party service enterprises, systematically analyzes the behavior evolution law, and proposes treatment and optimization countermeasures. The findings are as follows: First, the existing shale gas ex-ploration and development waste management mode has three contradictions: the leading idea and the green development concept, the development mode and the sustainable development idea, the waste treatment capacity and the actual demand; The second is the optimal stabilization strategy based on the behavioral game of the three key entities of the government, oilfield enterprises and third-party waste treatment enterprises (weak supervision, active governance and emphasis on subsidies). Therefore, the establishment of correct governance concepts, reshaping scientific gov-ernance methods, and innovative governance technologies will be conducive to the improvement of waste management efficiency of shale gas exploration and development in Sichuan Basin, and will be conducive to the unification of resource development and environmental protection.
[1] | 朱永楠, 苏健, 王建华, 等. 西部地区油气资源开发与水资源协同发展模式探索[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23(3): 129-134. |
[2] | 吴娜, 聂志强, 李开环, 等. 页岩气开采钻井固体废物的污染特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(3): 1094-1100. |
[3] | 新华社. 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第五次全体会议公报[EB/OL].
http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-10/29/content_5555877.htm, 2023-12-10. |
[4] | 贺善侃. 马克思关于人与自然和谐发展的思想及其在当代中国的发展与实践[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 50(5): 37-45. |
[5] | 刘湘溶, 曾晚生. 绿色发展理念的生态伦理意蕴[J]. 伦理学研究, 2018(3): 17-22. |
[6] | 陈世永. 当代人类中心主义视野中的可持续发展研究[J]. 理论与改革, 2014(3): 5-7. |
[7] | 孟兆磊. 我国天然石墨行业可持续发展问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京科技大学, 2021. |
[8] | 饶维, 刘文士, 黄庆, 等. 四川页岩气开发压裂返排液和油基岩屑处理处置探析[J]. 环境影响评价, 2019, 41(1): 15-19. |
[9] | 于劲磊, 蒋国斌, 王红娟, 等. 川南页岩气钻井固体废物污染防治问题及对策初探[J]. 石油化工应用, 2020, 39(10): 25-29. |
[10] | 熊晓青. 多元共治视阈下的三峡清漂长效机制研究[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2019, 29(10): 30-36. |
[11] | 李正升, 王俊程. 基于政府间博弈竞争的越界流域水污染治理困境分析[J]. 科学决策, 2014(12): 67-76. |
[12] | 杨苏, 林浩东. 考虑公众参与的公共工程项目应急管理演化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 95-101. |
[13] | 王仁超, 陈宏运, 毛三军, 等. 长江大保护工程建设主体策略选择演化博弈研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(1): 110-120. |
[14] | 高攀, 杜汪苗, 赵旭. 大中型水电工程库区漂浮物协同治理的多元主体博弈研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(5): 32-42+51. |
[15] | 秦书生, 胡楠. 中国绿色发展理念的理论意蕴与实践路径[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(6): 631-636. |