全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

具身认知研究进展综述
The Review of Progress in Embodied Cognition Research

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.141054, PP. 387-394

Keywords: 具身认知,概念隐喻,拥有感,镜像神经元,生成认知
Embodied Cognition
, Conceptual Metaphor, Sense of Ownership, Mirror Neurons, Encated Cognition

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

自20世纪80年代第二代认识科学革命以来,具身认知已经成为认知科学经典理论之一。以具身认知为代表的第二代认知科学范式,其主张强调身体在认知中发挥的重要作用。对于具身认知的讨论,最初仅仅是哲学领域有关身心关系问题的形而上学的思考,随后其开始成为心理学中的一种理论思维并逐步进入实验心理学领域。如今ERP、fMRI等认知神经科学的手段在具身认知的研究中得到了广泛使用。具身认知研究成为心理学和认知科学中的一股汹涌澎湃的实证研究思潮。文章对近些年来的具身认知发展过程进行简要梳理,并对发展过程中取得的研究成果进行简要阐述。
Since the second-generation cognitive science revolution in the 1980s, embodied cognition has be-come one of the classical theories of cognitive science. Embodied cognition is a second-generation cognitive science paradigm whose claims emphasize the important role played by the body in cog-nition. The discussion of embodied cognition was initially a metaphysical reflection on the relation-ship between mind and body in philosophy, and then it started to become a theoretical thinking in psychology and gradually entered the field of experimental psychology. Nowadays, cognitive neuro-science tools such as ERP and fMRI are widely used in the study of embodied cognition. The study of embodied cognition has become a surging trend of empirical research in psychology and cognitive science. The article briefly summarizes the development process of embodied cognition in recent years and briefly describes the research results achieved in the development process.

References

[1]  陈波, 陈巍, 丁峻(2010). 具身认知观: 认知科学研究的身体主题回归. 心理研究, 3(4), 3-12.
[2]  陈巍(2021). 具身认知心理学: 大脑、身体与心灵的对话. 科学出版社.
[3]  陈巍, 郭本禹(2014). 具身-生成的认知科学: 走出“战国时代”. 心理学探新, 34(2), 111-116.
[4]  何听雨, 丁一, 李昊堃, 程晓荣, 范炤, 定险峰(2020). 时间的多维度空间表征: 分离的起源与激活机制. 心理科学进展, 28(6), 935-944.
[5]  李其维(2008). “认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议. 心理学报, 40(12), 1306-1327.
[6]  李子健, 张积家, 乔艳阳(2018). 具身理论分歧: 概念隐喻与知觉符号观. 科学技术哲学研究, 35(2), 45-51.
[7]  武建峰(2017). 认知生成主义的认识论问题. 学术交流, (5), 70-75.
[8]  谢子燊, 叶浩生(2019). 生成认知与具身机能主义的比较——表征的取舍. 心理科学, 42(6), 1520-1525.
[9]  徐紫颖, 苏佳佳, 叶浩生(2022). 具身道德隐喻映射机制的双向性及其问题——基于具身效应“可重复性危机”的思考. 心理学探新, 42(5), 387-394.
[10]  叶浩生(2020). 认知心理学的实用性转向. 心理科学, 43(3), 762-767.
[11]  叶浩生, 曾红, 杨文登(2019). 生成认知: 理论基础与实践走向. 心理学报, 51(11), 1270-1280.
[12]  易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生(2018). 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响. 心理学报, 50(7), 793-802.
[13]  张潮, 刘赛芳, 隋玲, 乔园园(2019). 宽容概念的大小隐喻表征: 双向性及社会性. 心理与行为研究, 17(6), 824-830.
[14]  张静, 陈巍(2020). 身体拥有感及其可塑性: 基于内外感受研究的视角. 心理科学进展, 28(2), 305-315.
[15]  张铁山(2023). 当代认知生成主义的理论研究进路及其哲学反思. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 43(2), 13-19.
[16]  张绣蕊, 魏屹东(2021). 心理空间: 知觉符号理论的修正与扩展. 自然辩证法通讯, 43(1), 22-27.
[17]  张亚慧, 鲁忠义(2019). 青少年犯罪者道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理表征及其原因. 心理发展与教育, 35(6), 648-656.
[18]  赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁(2019). 橡胶手错觉: 拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 37-50.
[19]  郑皓元, 叶浩生, 苏得权(2017). 有关具身认知的三种理论模型. 心理学探新, 37(3), 195-199.
[20]  周帆, 姜英杰, 李力红(2022). 权力概念垂直空间隐喻表征激活的条件. 心理科学, 45(3), 538-544.
[21]  朱海燕, 宋志一, 张晓琳(2018). “心灵鸡汤”对温度知觉、他人评价和自我评价的影响. 心理科学, 41(1), 112-117.
[22]  Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993
[23]  Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action An-ticipation and Motor Resonance in Elite Basketball Players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-1116.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2182
[24]  Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sci-ences, 22, 577-660.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
[25]  Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Foell, J., Diers, M., & Flor, H. (2012). The Perceptual and Neuronal Stability of the Rubber Hand Illusion across Contexts and over Time. Brain Research, 1452, 130-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001
[26]  Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber Hands ‘Feel’ Touch That Eyes See. Nature, 391, 756.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35784
[27]  Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time. Cognition, 106, 579-593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
[28]  Clark, A. (1999). An Embodied Cognitive Science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345-351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3
[29]  Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014). Mirror Neurons: From Origin to Function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 177-192.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000903
[30]  de Vignemont, F., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2006). Body Mereology. In G. Knoblich, I. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Perception of the Human Body (pp. 147-170). Oxford University Press.
[31]  Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). That’s My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb. Science, 305, 875-877.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097011
[32]  Ferrari, P. F., Rozzi, S., & Fogassi, L. (2005). Mirror Neurons Re-sponding to Observation of Actions Made with Tools in Monkey Ventral Premotor Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neurosci-ence, 17, 212-226.
https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124910
[33]  Ferrari, P. F., Tramacere, A., Simpson, E. A., & Iriki, A. (2013). Mirror Neurons through the Lens of Epigenetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 450-457.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.003
[34]  Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implica-tions for Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
[35]  Haans, A., Kaiser, F. G., Bouwhuis, D. G., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Individual Differences in the Rubber-Hand Illusion: Predicting Self-Reports of People’s Personal Experiences. Acta Psychologica, 141, 169-177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.016
[36]  Heyes, C. (2010). Where Do Mirror Neurons Come from? Neuro-science & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 575-583.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.007
[37]  Hong, J., & Sun, Y. (2012). Warm It Up with Love: The Effect of Physical Coldness on Liking of Romance Movies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 293-306.
https://doi.org/10.1086/662613
[38]  Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
[39]  Kang, Y., Williams, L. E., Clark, M. S., Gray, J. R., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Physical Temperature Effects on Trust Behavior: The Role of Insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 507-515.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq077
[40]  Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. University of Chicago Press.
[41]  Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Meta-phors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
[42]  Lebon, F., Ruffino, C., Greenhouse, I., Labruna, L., Ivry, R. B., & Papaxanthis, C. (2019). The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation during Actual and Imagined Move-ments. Cerebral Cortex, 29, 689-700.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx350
[43]  Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). On the Other Hand: Dummy Hands and Peripersonal Space. Behavioural Brain Research, 191, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041
[44]  Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the Sunny Side Is Up: Association between Affect and Vertical Position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
[45]  Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Brain Regions with Mirror Properties: A Meta-Analysis of 125 Human fMRI Studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Re-views, 36, 341-349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004
[46]  Paladino, M., Mazzurega, M., Pavani, F., & Schubert, T. W. (2010). Synchronous Multisensory Stimulation Blurs Self-Other Boundaries. Psychological Science, 21, 1202-1207.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379234
[47]  Riemer, M., Bublatzky, F., Trojan, J., & Alpers, G. W. (2015). De-fensive Activation during the Rubber Hand Illusion: Ownership versus Proprioceptive Drift. Biological Psychology, 109, 86-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.04.011
[48]  Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The Mir-ror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
[49]  Ruggiero, M., & Catmur, C. (2018). Mirror Neurons and Intention Understanding: Dissociating the Contribution of Object Type and Intention to Mirror Responses Using Elec-tromyography. Psychophysiology, 55, e13061.
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13061
[50]  Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K., Bastian, B., & Ambady, N. (2014). Fluid Movement and Fluid Social Cognition: Bodily Movement Influences Essentialist Thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 111-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213506467
[51]  Tsakiris, M. (2010). My Body in the Brain: A Neurocognitive Model of Body-Ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 703-712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034
[52]  Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping One’s Distance—The Influence of Spatial Distance Cues on Affect and Evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302-308.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
[53]  Zanolie, K., Dantzig, S. V., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty Metaphors: Behavioral and ERP Evidence That Power Shifts Attention on a Vertical Dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78, 50-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006
[54]  Zhang, J., Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). The Virtual Hand Illusion Is Moderated by context-Induced Spatial Reference Frames. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, e40867.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01659

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133