|
大学生社会存在感与网络学习投入:心流体验的中介作用
|
Abstract:
为了考察大学生社会存在感、心流体验与网络学习投入之间的关系,本研究使用社会存在感量表、心流体验量表和大学生网络学习投入量表对844名大学生进行问卷调查。研究结果如下:1) 大学生的网络学习投入在性别、年级以及生源地上有显著差异;2) 社会存在感对网络学习投入具有正向预测作用;3) 心流体验在社会存在感与网络学习投入之间起部分中介作用。本研究对于促进大学生网络学习投入具有启发意义,在网络学习的过程中,应当适当关注大学生的社会存在感与心流体验,从而使大学生网络学习效果得到提高。
In order to examine the relationship between college students’ social presence, flow experience and online learning engagement, this study conducted a questionnaire survey with 844 college students using the Social Presence Scale, the Flow Experience Scale and the College Students’ Online Learning Engagement Scale. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are significant differences in college students’ online learning engagement in terms of gender, grade level, and place of origin; (2) social presence has a positive predictive effect on online learning engagement; and (3) the flow ex-perience partially mediates the relationship between social presence and online learning engage-ment. This study is instructive for promoting college students’ online learning engagement, and in the process of online learning, appropriate attention should be paid to college students’ social presence and flow experience, so as to improve the effect of college students’ online learning.
[1] | 蔡林, 贾绪计(2020). 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系: 学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(6), 805-811. |
[2] | 陈春平, 何子耕, 张斌, 谭子妍(2023). 在线学习中大学生数字化学习能力、学习投入与学习效果的关系研究. 高等理科教育, (2), 72-80. |
[3] | 崔文琴(2012). 当代大学生学习投入的现状及对策研究. 高教探索, (6), 67-71+143. |
[4] | 代宝, 刘业政(2015). 互联网中的心流体验研究综述: 概念、前因与后果. 信息系统学报, (1), 84-98. |
[5] | 高洁, 李明军, 张文兰(2015). 主动性人格与网络学习投入的关系——自我决定动机理论的视角. 电化教育研究, 36(8), 18-22+29. |
[6] | 江毓君, 白雪梅, 伍文臣, 罗晓娟(2019). 在线学习体验影响因素结构关系探析. 现代远距离教育, (1), 27-36. |
[7] | 荆永君, 李昕, 姜雪(2021). 在线学习行为意向影响因素分析及后疫情时代的教育启示. 中国电化教育, (6), 31-38. |
[8] | 兰国帅, 钟秋菊, 吕彩杰, 等(2018). 学习存在感与探究社区模型关系研究. 开放教育研究, 24(5), 92-107. |
[9] | 李辉, 黄堂红(2007). 浅谈网络教育中学生社会存在感的培养. 现代远距离教育, (4), 38-40. |
[10] | 李人杰, 郭建鹏, 吕帅(2022). 任务技术匹配如何影响大学生在线学习持续使用意愿——基于全国258所高校的实证调查. 中国高教研究, (12), 45-50+58. |
[11] | 廖友国(2011). 大学生学习投入问卷的编制及现状调查. 集美大学学报(教育科学版), 12(2), 39-44. |
[12] | 苗冬玲, 吴昭, 闫寒冰(2021). 全视角学习理论视域下的在线学习粘性影响因素研究. 中国远程教育(综合版), (10), 68-75. |
[13] | 乔伟峰, 刘威童, 李曼丽(2021). 学生眼里的在线教学: 行为、效果与挑战——基于新冠疫情期间清华大学学生在线学习行为调查. 清华大学教育研究, 42(1), 57-66. |
[14] | 孙烨超, 李雪梅, 杨运强(2022). 高校大规模线上教学场景中的社会存在感研究. 中国远程教育, (6), 36-45+77. |
[15] | 王芊芊, 李晓敏, 吴萌萌, 等(2022). 大学生网络学习适应性影响因素研究. 中国教育信息化, 28(12), 53-58. |
[16] | 王卫, 史锐涵, 李晓娜(2017). 基于心流体验的在线学习持续意愿影响因素研究. 中国远程教育, (5), 17-23+79. |
[17] | 魏顺平(2012). 在线学习行为特点及其影响因素分析研究. 开放教育研究, 18(4), 81-90+17. |
[18] | 肖爱平, 蒋成凤(2009). 网络学习者网上学习现状、影响因素及对策研究. 开放教育研究, 15(1), 75-80. |
[19] | 尹睿, 徐欢云(2016). 国外在线学习投入的研究进展与前瞻. 开放教育研究, 22(3), 89-97. |
[20] | 张信勇, 卞小华, 徐光兴(2008). 大学生的学习投入与人格坚韧性的关系. 心理研究, 1(6), 72-76. |
[21] | 钟启泉(2006). 知识建构与教学创新——社会建构主义知识论及其启示. 全球教育展望, 35(8), 12-18. |
[22] | Cesari, V., Galgani, B., Gemignani, A., & Menicucci, D. (2021). En-hancing Qualities of Consciousness during Online Learning via Multisensory Interactions. Behavioral Sciences, 11, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11050057 |
[23] | Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging Online Learners: The Impact of Web-Based Learning Technology on College Student Engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222-1232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008 |
[24] | Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2005). Flow in Comput-er-Mediated Environments: Promises and Challenges. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01504 |
[25] | Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 |
[26] | Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social Presence as a Predictor of Satisfaction within a Computer-Mediated Conferencing Environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970 |
[27] | Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in Technology-Mediated Learning: A Review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 |
[28] | Howard, S. K., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2016). Student Rules: Ex-ploring Patterns of Students’ Computer-Efficacy and Engagement with Digital Technologies in Learning. Computers & Ed-ucation, 101, 29-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.008 |
[29] | Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. |
[30] | Maestrales, S., Marias Dezendorf, R., Tang, X., Salmela-Aro, K., Bartz, K., Juuti, K. et al. (2022). US and Finnish High School Science Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Psychology, 57, 73-86.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12784 |
[31] | Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & Mateo, N. J. (2016). Engagement, Flow, Self-Efficacy, and Eustress of University Students: A Cross-National Comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. Journal of Psychology, 150, 281-299.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595 |
[32] | Pellas, N. (2014). The Influence of Computer Self-Efficacy, Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Self-Esteem on Student Engagement in Online Learning Programs: Evidence from the Virtual World of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048 |
[33] | Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ Patterns of Engagement and Course Performance in a Massive Open Online Course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015 |
[34] | Randolph, K. A. et al. (2006). A Strategy for Assessing the Im-pact of Time-Varying Family Risk Factors on High School Dropout. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 933-950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06287168 |
[35] | Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating Online Discussions Effectively. In-ternet & Higher Education, 10, 77-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001 |
[36] | Sun, C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational Interest, Computer Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Their Impact on Student Engagement in Distance Education. British Journal of Educa-tional Technology, 43, 191-204.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x |
[37] | Wei, C. W., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk. (2012). A Model for So-cial Presence in Online Classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9 |
[38] | Weinei, M., Bannert, M., Zumbach, J., Hoppe, H. U., & Malzahn, N. (2011). A Closer Look on Social Presence as a Causing Factor in Computer-Mediated Collaboration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 513-521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.020 |
[39] | Whipp, J. L., & Lorentz, R. A. (2009). Cognitive and Social Help Giv-ing in Online Teaching: An Exploratory Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57, 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9104-7 |
[40] | Zhan, S. A., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The Effects of Flow, Emo-tional Engagement, and Motivation on Success in a Gamified Online Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Compu-ting Research, 57, 2006-2031.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159 |