|
家庭社会经济地位对大学生未来取向的预测:心理资本的中介效应
|
Abstract:
为探讨家庭社会经济地位对大学生未来取向的影响机制,并检验心理资本的中介效应模型及其模型适用性,选取162名高校大学生为实验对象,采用MacArthur阶梯量表、“未来结果考量–未来”分量表、积极心理资本问卷进行测试,借此构建三个变量之间的关系模型,探索促进大学生未来取向积极发展的内在机制。结果表明:主观家庭社会经济地位能够正向预测大学生未来取向;心理资本在主观家庭SES与大学生未来取向之间起完全中介作用,即生活在低家庭SES的大学生,对未来发展缺乏信心,从而在面对未来时做出短视化决策;反之高家庭SES的大学生更相信自己能够把握未来,在决策未来时更倾向于考虑长远发展。
In order to explore the influence mechanism of family socioeconomic status on college students’ fu-ture orientation, and to test the mediating effect model of psychological capital and its applicability, 162 college students were selected as experimental subjects. MacArthur Ladder Scale, “Future Outcome Consideration - Future” subscale and positive psychological capital questionnaire were used to test. The relationship model between the three variables is constructed to explore the in-ternal mechanism of promoting the positive development of college students’ future orientation. The results show that: Subjective family socioeconomic status can positively predict college stu-dents’ future orientation; psychological capital plays a complete mediating role between subjective family SES and college students’ future orientation, that is, college students living in low family SES lack confidence in future development, and thus make short-sighted decisions when facing the fu-ture; on the contrary, college students with high family SES are more confident that they can grasp the future and tend to consider long-term development when making future decisions.
[1] | 邓士婷(2015). 高职生未来取向、心理资本与学业倦怠的特点及关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学. |
[2] | 冯伊乔(2013). 家庭社会经济地位对青少年未来取向的影响: 人格特质的调节作用. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学. |
[3] | 何丽明(2012). 大学生未来取向影响因素及其作用机制研究. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 广州大学. |
[4] | 李薇, 季旭峰(2014). 地方本科院校家庭经济困难学生的心理资本研究. 南京晓庄学院学报, (4), 64-67. |
[5] | 庞丽(2015). 能力本位视野下高校家庭经济困难学生心理资本培育路径. 中国成人教育, (11), 59-61. |
[6] | 史艳琴(2018). 家庭环境变量下的医学生心理资本现状调查研究. 内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (47), 111-115. |
[7] | 叶宝娟, 温忠麟(2013). 有中介的调节模型检验方法: 甄别和整合. 心理学报, (9), 1050-1060. |
[8] | Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy White Women. Health Psychology Official Journal of the Divi-sion of Health Psychology American Psychological Association, 19, 586-592.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 |
[9] | Bradley, R., & Crowyn, R. (2002). Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 |
[10] | Matthews, K. A., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological Perspectives on Pathways Linking Socioeconomic Status and Physical Health. Annual Review of Psychology , 62, 41-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130711 |
[11] | Neblett, N. G. & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Adolescents’ Thoughts about Parents’ Job and Their Importance for Adolescents’ Future Orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 795-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.11.006 |
[12] | Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How Do Adolescents See Their Future? A Review of the Development of Future Orientation and Planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6 |
[13] | Yoder, K. A. & Hoyt, D. R. (2005). Family Economic Pressure and Adolescent Suicidal Ideation: Application of the Family Stress Model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35, 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2005.35.3.251 |