Pneumatic tire modeling and validation have been the
topic of several research papers, however, most of these papers only deal with
pneumatic passenger and truck tires. In recent years, wheeled-scaledvehicles have gained lots of attention as a feasible testing platform,
nonetheless up to the authors’ knowledge there has been no research regarding
the use of scaled tires and their effect on the overall vehicle performance
characteristics.This paper presents a novel scaled electric combat vehicle
tire model and validation technique. The pro-line lockdown tire size
3.00×7.35 is modeled using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) technique and
several materials including layered membrane, beam elements, and Mooney-Rivlin
for rubber. The tire-rim assembly is then described, and the rigid body
analysis is presented. The tire is then validated using an in-house custom-made
static tire testing machine. The tire test rig is made specifically to test the
pro-line tire model and is designed and manufactured in the laboratory. The
tire is validated using vertical stiffness and footprint tests in the static
domain at different operating conditions including several vertical loads. Then
the tire is used to perform rolling resistance and steering analysis including
the rolling resistance coefficient and the cornering stiffness. The analysis is
performed at different operating conditions including longitudinal speeds of 5,
10, and 15 km/h. This tire model will be further used to determine the tractive
and braking performance of the tire. Furthermore, the tire test rig will also
be modified to perform cornering stiffness tests.
References
[1]
Tan, A.H., Lang, H. and El-Gind, M. (2019) A Novel Autonomous Scaled Electric Combat Vehicle. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Anaheim, 18-21 August 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97163
[2]
Sidhu, C.S., El-Sayegh, Z. and El-Gindy, M. (2023) Non-Pneumatic Tyre-Road Interaction Using Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 17, 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVSMT.2023.132314
[3]
Phromjan, J. and Suvanjumrat, C. (2021) Development of Solid Tire Model for Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Loading. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology, 43, 229-236.
[4]
Suvanjumrat, C. and Rugsaj, R. (2020) The Dynamic Finite Element Model of Non-Pneumatic Tire under Comfortable Riding Evaluation. International Journal of GEOMATE, 19, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.76.9135
[5]
Phromjan, J. and Suvanjumrat, C. (2020) The Contact Patch Analysis of Solid Tire on Drum Testing by Finite Element Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 886, Article ID: 012049.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/886/1/012049
[6]
El-Sayegh, Z., et al. (2019) Development of an HLFS Agricultural Tire Model Using FEA Technique. SN Applied Sciences, 1, Article No. 1454.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1524-y
Keerthiwansa, G.W.R., et al. (2018) Elastomer Testing: The Risk of Using Only Uniaxial Data for Fitting the Mooney-Rivlin Hyperelastic-Material Model. Materiali in tehnologije, 52, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2017.085
[9]
Kim, B., et al. (2012) A Comparison among Neo-Hookean Model, Mooney-Rivlin Model, and Ogden Model for Chloroprene Rubber. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13, 759-764.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y
[10]
Bergstrom, J. (2015) Elasticity/Hyperelasticity. Mechanics of Solid Polymers, 2015, 209-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-31150-2.00005-4
[11]
Group, E. (2000) Pam-Crash Theory Notes Manual. Pam System International.