全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Environmental Impact Assessment System and Process in Developing Countries

DOI: 10.4236/oje.2023.1312059, PP. 977-1009

Keywords: EIA, Process and Practice, Evolution, Developing Countries, Legal Instruments, Implications

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Environmental impact assessment (EIA), a decision-making process for project appraisal and sustainability adopted globally as an administrative process to identify, predict, evaluate, and monitor projects from their feasibility, preconstruction, construction, and operation stages to mitigate the adverse impacts and enhance the beneficial impacts for the protection of the affected environment, The study objective is to explore global EIA systems and processes and find shortcomings and implications for making the best instrument or tool to protect the natural environment from man-made activities over the project cycle. For this, the relevant literature on the EIA system and process was reviewed and evaluated through the application of quantitative and qualitative approaches, including the assessment of legal instruments and the adoption of EIA methodologies in developing countries. EIA, initiated in the 1970s in the US and Australia, expanded to developing countries and was amended in East and Southeast Asia from the 1970s to the 2000s. The evaluation assessed that the South Asian countries follow UNEP and IAIA guidelines, utilizing national laws and expert consultations, with screening criteria and administrative processes based on established environmental legislation. Ad hoc, checklist, matrix, network, overlay, cost-benefit analysis, and predictive or simulation in EIA practice are used to assess the environmental impacts of development activities. Failure to recommend major projects undermines public trust and prevents mitigation measures from being implemented. Most developing countries have followed EIA to fulfill the legal requirement with shadow-off monitoring and follow-up rather than to upset, reduce, or compensate for the project impacts as per size, location, and severity of the project area. The research and guidelines outlined in the IAIA principles and process have synthesized the best EIA practices worldwide. Public participation, impact coverage, scientific mitigation, transparent evidence-based approaches, monitoring, follow-up, legitimate approaches, and future appraisal opportunities are major concerns to be included in best EIA practice.

References

[1]  Fischer, T.B., Fonseca, A., Geißler, G., Jha-Thakur, U., Retief, F., Alberts, R. and Jiricka-Pürrer, A. (2023) Simplification of Environmental and Other Impact Assessments—Results from an International Online Survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 41, 181-189.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2023.2198839
[2]  Kamijo, T. (2022) How to Enhance EIA Systems in Developing Countries: A Quantitative Literature Review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 134976-13492.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02029-0
[3]  Morgan, R.K. (2012) Environmental Impact Assessment: The State of the Art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 5-14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
[4]  Pölönen, P.H.K.J. (2011) The Effectiveness of the Finnish EIA System—What Works, What Doesn’t, and What Could Be Improved? Environmental Impact Assessment, 31, 120-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003
[5]  Sadler, B. (1996) Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, 248 p.
[6]  Fonseca, A. and Rodrigues, S.E. (2017) The Attractive Concept of Simplicity in Environmental Impact Assessment: Perceptions of Outcomes in Southeastern Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67, 101-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.09.001
[7]  Enríquez-de-Salamanca, á. (2021) Simplified Environmental Impact Assessment Processes: Review and Implementation Proposals. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 90, Article 106640.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106640
[8]  Fischer, T.B. (2022) Replacing EIA and SEA with Environmental Outcome Reports (EORs)—The 2022 Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill in the UK. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40, 267-268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2089375
[9]  Bond, A., Pope, J., Morrison-Saunders, A., Retief, F. and Gunn, J.A.E. (2014) Impact Assessment: Eroding Benefits through Streamlining? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 46-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.002
[10]  de Smidt, J. (1994) Advisory Review of the Environmental Impact Statement of the Arun III Hydroelectric Project Nepal. Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment, Utrecht.
[11]  Wilkins, H. (2013) The Need for Subjectivity in EIA: Discourse as a Tool for Sustainable Development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 401-414.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1
[12]  Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P. and Wood, C. (2007) Environmental Impact Assessment: Retrospect and Prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 287-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
[13]  Treweek, J. (1999) Ecological Impact Assessment. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 349 p.
[14]  Beanlands, G.E. and Duinker, P.N. (1983) An Ecological Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Dalhousie.
[15]  Beanlands, G.E. (1987) In Situ Contaminants and Environmental Assessment—An Ecological Summary. Hydrobiologia, 149, 113-118.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048652
[16]  Schmeidler, E. and Sandman, P.M. (1988) Getting to Maybe: Decisions on the Road to Negotiation in Hazardous Waste Facility Siting. Environmental Education Fund, Environmental Communication Research Program, Rutgers University.
[17]  Rosenberg, D.M., Resh, V.H., Balling, S.S., Barnby, M.A., Collins, J.N., Durbin, D.V., Flynn, T.S., Hart, D.D., Lamberti, G.A., McElravy, E.P., Wood, J.R., Blank, T.E., Schultz, D.M., Marrin, D.L. and Price, D.G. (1981) Recent Trend in Environmental Impact Assessment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 38, 591-624.
https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-082
[18]  Sigal, L.L. and Suter II, G.W. (1987) Evaluation of Methods Determining Adverse Impacts of Air Pollution on Terrestrial Ecosystems. Environmental Management, 11, 675-694.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880167
[19]  Hinds, W.T. (1984) Towards Monitoring of Long-Term Trends in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Environmental Conservation, 11, 11-18.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44517588
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900013448
[20]  Green, R.H. (1979) Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. Wiley, New York, 257 p.
[21]  Lohani, B., Evans, J.W., Ludwig, H., Everitt, R.R., Carpenter, R.A. and Tu, S.L. (1997) Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia. Volume 1—Overview. 356 p.
[22]  Morris, P. and Therivel, R. (2001) Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment, 2nd Edition, Routledge, London/New York, 479 p.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995709
[23]  Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A. (1999) Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures, Process, Practice and Prospects. UCL Press, London.
[24]  Bartlett, R.V. and Kurian, P. (1999) The Theory of Environmental Impact Assessment: Implicit Models of Policy Making. Policy and Politics, 27, 415-433.
https://doi.org/10.1332/030557399782218371
[25]  IAIA (1999) Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice. International Association for Impact Assessment, UK.
[26]  Kjørven, O. and Lindhjem, H. (2002) Strategic Environmental Assessment in World Bank Operations Experience to Date—Future Potential. Environmental Strategy Paper 4, World Bank Environment Department, Washington DC.
[27]  Petts, J. (1999) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Volume 1, Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.
[28]  Mercier, J.-R. (2001) Environmental Assessment at the World Bank: New Developments and Strategic Directions (OP 4.01). Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2001, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and EIA Centre, Lincoln, UK.
[29]  Sadler, B. and Verheem, R. (1996) Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges. Report No. 53, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Future Directions and Environment, The Hague, 71 p.
[30]  Brown, L. (1997) The Environmental Overview in Development Project Formulation. Impact Assessment, 15, 73-88.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1997.9726123
[31]  Sadler, B. (2012) On Evaluating the Success of EIA and SEA. In: Arts, J. and Morrison-Saunders, A., Eds., Assessing Impact, Routledge, London, 269-306.
[32]  Dalal-Clayton, B. and Sadler, B. (1988) Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Rapidly Evolving Approach. A Directory of Impact Assessment Guideline, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 31-42.
[33]  OECD (1992) Guidelines on AID and Environment: Good Practices for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects. OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC), Paris.
[34]  OECD (1994) Towards Coherence in Environmental Assessment, Volume II. Results of the Project on Coherence of Environmental Assessment for International Bilateral Aid, 349 p.
[35]  Lantieri, A., Lukacova, Z., McGuinn, J. and McNeil, A. (2014) Environmental Impact Assessment of Projects. European Union, Luxembourg.
[36]  Division, S. (2023) Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (M49 Standard), UN Statistical Division.
[37]  Jalal, K.F. (1993) Sustainable Development, Environment, and Poverty Nexus. Asian Development Bank, 24 p.
[38]  ADB (1993) Guidelines for Integrated Regional Economic-Environmental Development Planning, Volume I: Guidelines. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 125 p.
[39]  Ebisemiju F. (1993) Environmental Impact Assessment: Making It Work in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 247-273.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1044
[40]  Li, J.C. (2008) Environmental Impact Assessments in Developing Countries: An Opportunity for Greater Environmental Security? Working Paper No. 4, USAID, Foundation for Environmental Security & Sustainability (FESS), 38 p.
[41]  Barannik, A.D., Capcelea, A. and Klees, R. (2002) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Systems in Europe and Central Asia Countries. The World Bank Group, Washington DC.
[42]  Mubanga, R.O. and Kwarteng, K. (2020) A Comparative Evaluation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Legislation of South Africa and Zambia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, Article 106401.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106401
[43]  Al Farhad, Md.M., Yadav, N.K., Basu, D.D. and Garg, I. (2022) Environmental Impact Assessment: Evaluation of Legislations in Countries of Africa and South Asia. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, 118 p.
[44]  Appiah-Opoku, S. (1999) Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries: The Case of Ghana. Elsevier, USA.
[45]  MoF (2018) Environmental and Social Management Framework. Ministry of Finance, Afghanistan.
[46]  NEPA (2007) National Environmental Impact Assessment Policy. National Environmental Protection Agency, Afghanistan.
[47]  Mer 25, NCEA (2019) ESIA Profile: Bangladesh. Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment.
[48]  UNEP (2001) State of the Environment: Bhutan. United Nations Environment Programme. Regional Resource Centre for Asia and Pacific, AIT, Thailand.
[49]  NEC (2012) Environmental Assessment General Guideline. National Environment Commission, Royal Government of Bhutan, Bhutan.
[50]  Mywaste Solution (2022) EIA process in India—Complete Guide. My Waste Solution.
[51]  Bhatt, R.P. and Khanal, S. (2010) Environmental Impact Assessment System and Process: A Study on Policy and Legal Instruments in Nepal. African Journal of Environment Science and Technology, 4, 586-594.
[52]  Bhatt Ramesh, P. (2022) Consequences of Climate Change Impacts and Implications on Ecosystem and Biodiversity; Impacts of Developmental Projects and Mitigation Strategy in Nepal. In: Tiefenbacher, J.P., Ed., Climate Change in Asia and Africa—Examining the Biophysical and Social Consequences, and Society’s Responses, InTech Open, London.
[53]  Ehtasham, L., Sherani, S.H., Younas, K., Izbel, U., Khan, A.H., Bahadur, A. and Akbar, A. (2022) A Review of the Status of Environmental Impact Assessment in Pakistan. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18, 314-318.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4499
[54]  Shah, A., Khan, S., Shah, M.H., Khan, R. and Jan, I. (2010) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Infrastructure Development Projects in Developing Countries. OIDA-International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, 47-54.
[55]  Zuhair, M.H. and Kurian, P.A. (2016) Socio-Economic and Political Barriers to Public Participation in EIA: Implications for Sustainable Development in the Maldives. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34, 129-142.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176404
[56]  CEA (2013) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Procedure in Sri Lanka. Central Environmental Authority.
[57]  Leopold, L.B., Clarke, F.E., Manshaw, B.B. and Balsley, J.R. (1971) A Procedure for Evaluating Environmental Impacts. U.S. Geological Survey Circular No. 645. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
https://doi.org/10.3133/cir645
[58]  Environment, Alberta (2010) Reclamation Criteria for Well Sites and Associated Facilities for Cultivated Lands. Alberta Environment, Edmonton, AB, 117 p.
[59]  Barnes, J., Marquis, D. and Yamazaki, G. (2012) Significance Determination in Energy Project EA in Canada. Stantec Consulting, NB.
[60]  Morrison-Saunders, A., Marshall, R. and Arts, J. (2007) EIA Follow-Up International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 6, International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, USA.
[61]  Aung, T.S. and Fischer, T.B. (2020) Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Systems and Economic Growth in Countries Participating in the Belt and Road Initiatives. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38, 502-520.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1818520
[62]  Yang, Y. (2020) Reformed Environmental Impact Assessment in China: An Evaluation of Its Effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Protection, 11, 889-908.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.1110056
[63]  Khadka, R.B. and Shrestha, U. (2011) Process and Procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment Application in Some Countries of South Asia: A Review Study. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4, 215-233.
https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2011.215.233
[64]  Luisa, A., Lima, G., et al. (2015) Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in South Asia. International Association for Impact Assessment, UK.
[65]  Arnold, L. and Hanna, K. (2017) Best Practices in Environmental Assessment: Cases Studies and Application to Mining. Canadian International Resources and Development Institute (CIRDI) Report 2017-003.
[66]  Hanna, K.S. (2016) Environmental Impact Assessment Practice and Participation. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 480 p.
[67]  Senécal, P., Sadler, B., Goldsmith, B., Brown, K. and Conover, S. (1999) Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment, Best Practice. International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, ND; Institute of Environmental Assessment, Lincoln, UK.
[68]  Zhang, J., Kørnøv, L. and Christensen, P. (2013) Critical Factors for EA Implementation: Literature Review and Research Options. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 148-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030
[69]  Gibson, R.B., Doelle, M. and Sinclair, A.J. (2015) Fulfilling the Promise: Basic Components of Next Generation Environmental Assessment. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 29, 251-276.
[70]  Wood, G. and Becker, J. (2005) Discretionary Judgement in Local Planning Authority Decision Making: Screening Development Proposals for Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 349-371.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500067467
[71]  Snell, T. and Cowell, R. (2006) Scoping in Environmental Impact Assessment: Balancing Precaution and Efficiency? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 359-376.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003
[72]  Pinho, P., McCallum, S. and Cruz, S.S. (2010) A Critical Appraisal of EA Screening Practice in EU Member States. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28, 91-107.
https://doi.org/10.3152/146155110X498799
[73]  Morrison-Saunders, A. (2011) Principles for Effective Impact Assessment: Examples from Western Australia. IAIA11 Impact Assessment and Responsible Development for Infrastructure, Business and Industry, 31st Annual Conference of the International Association, Puebla, Mexico.
http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/6631
[74]  Joseph, C., Gunton, T. and Rutherford, M. (2015) Good Practices for Environmental Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33, 238-254.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1063811
[75]  Andre, P., Enserink, B., Connor, D. and Croal, P. (2006) Public Participation: International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 4, International Association for Impact Assessment.
[76]  Sinnclair, A.J. and Diduck, A.P. (2017) Reconceptualizing Public Participation in Environmental Assessment as EA Civics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 174-182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.009
[77]  Hartley, N. and Wood, C. (2005) Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment—Implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002
[78]  Duinker, P.N. and Greig, L.A. (2007) Scenario Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment: Improving Explorations of the Future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 206-219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001
[79]  Greig, L.A. and Duinker, P.N. (2011) A Proposal for Further Strengthening Science in Environmental Impact Assessment in Canada. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29, 159-165.
https://doi.org/10.3152/146155111X12913679730557
[80]  Hanna, K.S. and Noble, B.F. (2015) Using a Delphi Study to Identify Effectiveness Criteria for Environmental Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33, 116-125.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.992672
[81]  Palerm, J.R. (2000) An Empirical-Theoretical Analysis Framework for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43, 581-600.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713676582
[82]  Marshall, R., Arts, J. and Morrison-Saunders, A. (2005) International Principles for Best Practice EA Follow-Up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23, 175-181.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765490

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133