All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Relative Articles

More...

科技期刊提高编校质量的方法
Ways to Improve Editorial Quality in Scientific and Technical Journals

DOI: 10.12677/ISL.2023.74020, PP. 142-148

Keywords: 校对,编校合一,科技期刊
Proofreading
, Editing and Proofreading, Scientific and Technical Journals

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

校对是科技期刊出版的重要环节,也是科技出版物质量的重要组成部分。编辑质量和校对质量共同组成了出版物的编校质量,是出版物四项基本质量要求之一。文章简要探讨了科技期刊校对工作的重要性,当前校对工作尤其是编校合一模式下面临的主要问题,各个校次产生差错的主要来源及分别针对不同差错来源提高编校质量的方法。同时,介绍了三校之间的关系,并基于此寻找其他途径提高编校质量的方法,如人员校对中可以进行分层式、分布式、分块式、交叉式等校对,三校一读突出侧重点,明确各个校次的目标;另外需要充分利用工具校对,虽然目前编校方面的人工智能技术还不够成熟,但仍然可以帮助编辑部提高编校质量和效率,需要编辑校对人员引起关注和重视。
Proofreading is an important link in the publication of scientific and technical journals and an im-portant part of the quality of scientific and technical publications. The quality of editing and proof-reading together constitute the quality of editing and proofreading of publications, which is one of the four basic quality requirements of publications. The article briefly discusses the importance of proofreading work of scientific and technical journals, the main problems faced by proofreading work at present, especially in the mode of editing and proofreading, the main sources of errors produced by each school and the methods to improve the quality of proofreading according to dif-ferent sources of errors. At the same time, the relationship between the three proofreaders is in-troduced, and based on this, we look for other ways to improve the quality of proofreading, such as staff proofreading can be layered, distributed, chunked, cross-proofreading, etc., and the three proofreaders can highlight the focus of the readings, and make clear the objectives of each proof-reading; in addition, we need to make full use of the tools of proofreading, although the current arti-ficial intelligence technology in proofreading is not mature enough, but it can still help the editorial department to improve the quality and efficiency of proofreading, which requires editors to make full use of tools to proofread.

References

[1]  国家新闻出版署. 报纸期刊质量管理规定[J]. 中国出版, 2020(13): 5-11.
[2]  孙立华. 略论提高科技期刊校对质量的对策[J]. 新闻传播, 2017(22): 55-56.
[3]  付中静, 刘雪立, 张新, 等. 河南省105种科技期刊编校质量审读差错分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2011, 22(5): 724-727.
[4]  张彤, 胥橙庭, 夏道家. 江苏省科技期刊编校质量审读差错分析[J]. 学报编辑论丛, 2021(1): 280-286.
[5]  张青艳. 图书编辑和校对的分工与合作模式研究[J]. 新闻研究导刊, 2022, 13(16): 229-231.
[6]  成敏, 郭柏寿. 科技期刊编校现状分析与编校分离机制设计[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 20201, 32(3): 337-343.
[7]  朱银全, 王辉. 影子编校的剖析及纠防策略[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(10): 1049-1054.
[8]  周奇. 编辑阅读与校对阅读比较研究[J]. 出版科学, 2008, 16(3): 21-27.
[9]  吴志猛, 胡宝群. 微信在高校科技期刊编辑出版中的作用[J]. 学报编辑论丛, 2017(1): 310-312.
[10]  魏艳君, 彭熙. 学术期刊应重视作者校对[J]. 编辑学报, 2015, 27(4): 371-373.
[11]  柯文辉, 林海清, 翁志辉. 学术期刊清样作者校对环节中编辑的工作要点[J]. 编辑学报, 2013, 25(1): 37-38.
[12]  刘伟昌. 论校对工作对科技期刊质量的影响[J]. 传播力研究, 2018, 2(24): 64, 69.
[13]  陈智. 若干高校科技期刊校对效果提高途径[J]. 学报编辑论丛, 2012(1): 128-130.
[14]  侯修洲, 黄延红. 基于逻辑原则的科技论文自动校对方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(9): 920-924.
[15]  崔玉洁. ChatGPT与人工编校相结合: 提高期刊编校效率和文章质量[J]. 编辑学报, 2023, 35(4): 429-433.
[16]  胡佩. “人工智能 + 校对”的应用前景分析[J]. 现代出版, 2019(2): 59-61.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413