Microfiltration membrane technology has been widely used in various industries for solid-liquid separation. However, pore clogging remains a persistent challenge. This study employs (CFD) and discrete element method (DEM) models to enhance our understanding of microfiltration membrane clogging. The models were validated by comparing them to experimental data, demonstrating reasonable consistency. Subsequently, a parametric study was conducted on a cross-flow model, exploring the influence of key parameters on clogging. Findings show that clogging is a complex phenomenon affected by various factors. The mean inlet velocity and transmembrane flux were found to directly impact clogging, while the confinement ratio and cosine of the membrane pore entrance angle had an inverse relationship with it. Two clog types were identified: internal (inside the pore) and external (arching at the pore entrance), with the confinement ratio determining the type. This study introduced a dimensionless number as a quantitative clogging indicator based on transmembrane flux, Reynolds number, filtration time, entrance angle cosine, and confinement ratio. While this hypothesis held true in simulations, future studies should explore variations in clogging indicators, and improved modeling of clogging characteristics. Calibration between numerical and physical times and consideration of particle volume fraction will enhance understanding.
References
[1]
Li, N.N., Fane, A.G., Winston Ho, W.S. and Matsuura, T. (2008) Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
[2]
van Zwieten, R., van de Laar, T., Sprakel, J. and Schroen, K. (2018) From Cooperative to Uncorrelated Clogging in Cross-Flow Microfluidic Membranes. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 5687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24088-6
[3]
Rahimia, M., Madaenia, S.S., Abolhasania, M. and Alsairafib, A.A. (2009) CFD and Experimental Studies of Fouling of a Microfiltration Membrane. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 48, 1405-1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2009.07.008
[4]
van de Laar, T., Ten Klooster, S., Schroen, K. and Sprakel1, J. (2016) Transition-State Theory Predicts Clgging at the Microscal. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 28450. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28450
[5]
Dressaire, E. and Sauret, A. (2017) Clogging of Microfluidic Systems. Soft Matter, 13, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01879C
[6]
Andoa, T., Akamatsub, K., Nakao, S.-I. and Fujitac, M. (2012) Simulation of Fouling and Backwash Dynamics in Dead-End Microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 392-393, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.051
[7]
Smuts, E.M., Deglon, D.A. and Meyer, C.J. (2012) Methodology for CFD-DEM Modelling of Particulate Suspension Rheology. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, Melbourne, 10-12 December 2012. https://www.cfd.com.au/cfd_conf12/index.html
[8]
Bacchin, P., Derekx, Q., Veyret, D., Glucina, K. and Moulin, P. (2014) Clogging of Microporous Channels Networks: Role of Connectivity and Tortuosity. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 17, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1288-4
[9]
Addae-Mensah, K.A., Wang, Z.K., Parsa, H., Chin, S.Y., Laksanasopin, T. and Sia, S.K. (2010) Fundamentals of Microfluidics Devices. In: Kumar, C.S., Ed., Microfluidic Devices in Nanotechnology: Fundamental Concepts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470622636.ch1
[10]
Lohausa, J., Pereza, Y.M. and Wesslinga, M. (2018) What Are the Microscopic Events of Colloidal Membrane Fouling? Journal of Membrane Science, 553, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.023
[11]
Norouzi, H.R., Reza, Z., Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R. and Mostoufi, N. (2016) DEM Formulation. In: Coupled CFD-DEM Modeling: Formulation, Implementation and Application to Multiphase Flows, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 15-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119005315.ch2
[12]
Saxena, V., Krief, M. and Adam, L. (2018) Handbook of Borehole Acoustics and Rock Physics for Reservoir Characterization. Elsevier.
[13]
Siemens PLM Software (2023) StarCCM+ User Guide: Particle-Wall Link Model Reference (Version 14.06). Siemens PLM Software
[14]
Gu, Y., Ozel, A. and Sundaresan, S. (2016) A Modified Cohesion Model for CFD-DEM Simulations of Fluidization. Powder Technology, 296, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.09.037
[15]
Shahzad, K., D’Avino, G., Greco, F., Guido, S. and Maffettone, P.L. (2016) Numerical Investigation of Hard-Gel Microparticle Suspension Dynamics in Microfluidic Channels: Aggregation/Fragmentation Phenomena, and Incipient Clogging. Chemical Engineering Journal, 303, 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.134
[16]
Versteeg, H.K. and Malalasekera, W. (2007) An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2nd Edtiton, Pearson Education, London.
[17]
Lindberg, S. (2015) Numerical Simulation of Particle Soiling in the Engine Compartment of a Bus. Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg. https://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/219482/219482.pdf
