全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

民事执行领域下民营企业司法保障的问题透视与解决路径
Perspective and Solution Path of Judicial Protection of Private Enterprises in the Field of Civil Enforcement

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.1212991, PP. 7274-7281

Keywords: 民营企业,创新创业,司法保障,民事执行,营商环境法治化
Private Enterprise
, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Judicial Guarantees, Civil Enforcement, Law-Based Business Environment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

民营企业作为我国社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分,在我国当前经济结构转型阶段起到“助推器”的作用,运用法治手段服务保障民营经济健康发展,推动完善民事执行板块是应有之义。民事执行是建设法治化营商环境的最后一公里,是加强民营企业创新创业司法保障的重要一环。在国家政策的引领下,地方各级法院积极探索保障民营企业创新创业的司法路径,对营造法治化的营商环境起到了推动作用。但是对于民营企业的民事执行领域,仍存在失信被执行企业名单纳入范围不当,超标的额查封、执行监督不完善,资金周转难导致执行难等实践困境,需要从制度、执行法院和被执行企业三个层面寻求相应的纾解路径,从而加强对民营企业创新创业的司法保障,走好法治化营商环境建设道路的最后一步。
Private enterprises as an important part of China’s socialist market economy, in China’s current stage of economic structural transformation to play a “booster” role, the use of the rule of law to serve to protect the healthy development of the private economy, and to promote the improve-ment of the civil execution plate is the right thing to do. The civil enforcement board is the right thing to do. Civil enforcement is the last mile to build a business environment based on the rule of law, and is an important part of strengthening the judicial guarantee for innovation and entre-preneurship of private enterprises. Under the guidance of national policies, local courts at all le-vels have actively explored judicial paths to ensure the innovation and entrepreneurship of pri-vate enterprises, which has played a role in promoting the creation of a business environment based on the rule of law. However, in the field of civil enforcement of private enterprises, there are still practical difficulties such as improper inclusion in the list of untrustworthy enforced enterprises, imperfect enforcement supervision, and difficulty in capital turnover leading to enforcement difficulties, so it is necessary to seek corresponding relief paths from the three levels of system, enforcement court and enforced enterprise, so as to strengthen the judicial guarantee for innovation and entrepreneurship of private enterprises, and take the last step on the road of building a business environment based on the rule of law.

References

[1]  吴彤. 失信被执行人名单制度完善路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2022.
[2]  谢雯. 经验和逻辑的契合——失信被执行人名单制度之完善[J]. 阴山学刊, 2018(4): 83-89.
[3]  蔡惠霞. 失信被执行人名单制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2014.
[4]  李明辉, 盖文蕾. 营商环境优化背景下解决民事执行难的新思考[J]. 四川文理学院学报, 2022, 32(4): 46-51.
[5]  吴俊琪. 失信被执行人名单制度研究——以被执行人权利保障为视角[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2019.
[6]  熊德中. 论规范超标的额查封的执行行为——兼谈民事执行中的比例原则[J]. 北方法学, 2023, 17(1): 53-63.
[7]  王永恒. 中国民事执行和解制度的纠纷解决逻辑[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.
[8]  陈杭平. 论民事“执行和解”制度以“复杂性”化简为视角[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(5): 1222-1236.
[9]  李万祥. 优化机制护航民营经济[N]. 经济日报, 2022-07-14(005).
[10]  张海燕. 论执行和解申请执行人“双轨制”选择下的被执行人实体救济[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 42(4): 68-79.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133