|
在线环境下自我调节学习的元认知监控研究综述
|
Abstract:
有效的学习需要准确的元认知监控能力,在当前时代背景下,越来越多的学习环境要求学习者积极进行自我调节,运用元认知能力进行监测和调控自身的学习行为,以实现高效学习。文章通过梳理相关文献资料,在已有研究的基础上首先回顾了元认知的定义及研究范式,其次介绍了在学习过程中常见的元认知错觉和机制,以及在在线学习环境下提高学生元认知准确性的相关研究。已有研究表明在学习过程中加入元认知提示问题有助于提升学业表现,但于在线学习环境中设置同样的元认知支架是否会带来同样的效果有待进一步研究。最后基于当前研究提出了促进学习者元认知能力的教育对策,并为今后在线学习环境中的元认知研究提供思路与方向。
Effective learning requires accurate metacognitive monitoring ability, and in the current era, more and more learning environments require learners to actively self-regulate and use metacognitive ability to monitor and regulate their own learning behaviors in order to achieve efficient learning. By combing the relevant literature, the article firstly reviews the definition and research paradigm of metacognition on the basis of existing studies; secondly, it introduces the common metacognitive illusions and mechanisms in the learning process, as well as the relevant studies on improving students’ metacognitive accuracy in online learning environments. It has been shown that adding metacognitive cueing questions to the learning process can help improve academic performance, but whether the same metacognitive scaffolding in an e-learning environment will have the same effect needs to be further investigated. Finally, the article proposes educational countermeasures to promote learners’ metacognitive abilities based on current research and provides ideas and directions for future research on metacognition in online learning environments.
[1] | Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M. (1986) Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614 |
[2] | Zimmerman, B.J. (2008) Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909 |
[3] | 张锦坤, 白学军, 杨丽娴. 国外关于“微观”自我调节学习的研究概述[J]. 心理科学, 2009, 32(1): 164-166, 160. |
[4] | Ehrlinger, J. and Dunning, D. (2003) How Chronic Self-Views Influence (and Potentially Mislead) Estimates of Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633872013-215 |
[5] | Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D. and Kruger, J. (2008) Why the Unskilled Are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight among the Incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 |
[6] | Metcalfe, J. and Finn, B. (2008) Evidence That Judgments of Learning Are Causally Related to Study Choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174-179. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.174 |
[7] | 刘洋. 元认知支架对在线视频学习的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2021. |
[8] | Flavell, J.H. (1979) Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 |
[9] | Reder, L.M. and Schunn, C.D. (1996) Metacognition Does Not Imply Awareness: Strategy Choice Is Governed by Implicit Learning and Memory. In: Reder, L.M., Ed., Implicit Memory and Metacognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 45-78. |
[10] | 陈功香, 傅小兰. 学习判断及其准确性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(2): 176-184. |
[11] | Koriat, A. (1997) Monitoring One’s Own Knowledge during Study: A Cue-Utilization Approach to Judgments of Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 |
[12] | Wang, J.W. and Xing, Q. (2019) Metacognitive Illusion in Category Learning: Contributions of Processing Fluency and Beliefs. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0260-3 |
[13] | Rhodes, M.G. and Castel, A.D. (2008) Memory Predictions Are Influenced by Perceptual Information: Evidence for Metacognitive Illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615-625.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013684 |
[14] | Benjamin, A.S., Bjork, R.A. and Schwartz, B.L. (1998) The Mismeasure of Memory: When Retrieval Fluency Is Misleading as a Metamnemonic Index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55 |
[15] | 张俐娟, 张锦坤. 基于认知科学证据的自我管理学习策略[J]. 心理研究, 2018, 11(5): 387-394. |
[16] | Rohrer, D. and Taylor, K. (2006) The Effects of Overlearning and Distributed Practise on the Retention of Mathematics Knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1266 |
[17] | Schmidt, R.A. and Bjork, R.A. (1992) New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x |
[18] | Simon, D.A. and Bjork, R.A. (2001) Metacognition in Motor Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.907 |
[19] | Karpicke, J.D. and Blunt, J.R. (2011) Response to Comment on “Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping”. Science, 334, 453-453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204035 |
[20] | Roediger, H.L. and Karpicke, J.D. (2006) The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x |
[21] | Besken, M. and Mulligan, N.W. (2013) Easily Perceived, Easily Remembered? Perceptual Interference Produces a Double Dissociation between Metamemory and Memory Performance. Memory & Cognition, 41, 897-903.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8 |
[22] | Besken, M. and Mulligan, N.W. (2014) Perceptual Fluency, Auditory Generation, and Metamemory: Analyzing the Perceptual Fluency Hypothesis in the Auditory Modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034407 |
[23] | Koriat, A. and Bjork, R.A. (2006) Mending Metacognitive Illusions: A Comparison of Mnemonic-Based and Theory-Based Procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1133-1145.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1133 |
[24] | 陈颖, 李锋盈, 李伟健. 个体关于加工流畅性的信念对字体大小效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 154-162. |
[25] | Mueller, M.L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S.K. and Rhodes, M.G. (2014) The Font-Size Effect on Judgments of Learning: Does It Exemplify Fluency Effects or Reflect People’s Beliefs about Memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.007 |
[26] | Hoffman, B. and Spatariu, A. (2007) The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Metacognitive Prompting on Math Problem-Solving Efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psy-chology, 33, 875-893. https://doi.org/10.1037/e696892007-001 |
[27] | Topcu, A. (2010) Relationship of Metacognitive Monitoring with Interaction in an Asynchronous Online Discussion Forum. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449291003692649 |
[28] | Pieger, E. and Bannert, M. (2018) Differential Effects of Students’ Self-Directed Metacognitive Prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.022 |
[29] | Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J.J. and Fiore, S. (2011) Differential Impact of Two Types of Metacognitive Prompting Provided during Simulation-Based Training. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 696-702.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.017 |
[30] | Barenberg, J. and Dutke, S. (2013) Metacognitive Monitoring in University Classes: Anticipating a Graded vs. a Pass-Fail Test Affects Monitoring Accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 121-143.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9098-3 |
[31] | Elliot, A.J. and McGregor, H.A. (1999) Test Anxiety and the Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628 |
[32] | Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Le, H. and Carlstrom, A. (2004) Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 |