全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Proposal of a Deuterium-Deuterium Fusion Reactor Intended for a Large Power Plant

DOI: 10.4236/wjnst.2024.141001, PP. 1-58

Keywords: Fusion Reactor, Deuterium-Deuterium Reactor, Catalyzed D-D, Colliding Beams, Stellarator Reactor, Power Plant

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article looks for the necessary conditions to use Deuterium-Deuterium (D-D) fusion for a large power plant. At the moment, for nearly all the projects (JET, ITER…) only the Deuterium-Tritium (D-T) fuel is considered for a power plant. However, as shown in this article, even if a D-D reactor would be necessarily much bigger than a D-T reactor due to the much weaker fusion reactivity of the D-D fusion compared to the D-T fusion, a D-D reactor size would remain under an acceptable size. Indeed, a D-D power plant would be necessarily large and powerful, i.e. the net electric power would be equal to a minimum of 1.2 GWe and preferably above 10 GWe. A D-D reactor would be less complex than a D-T reactor as it is not necessary to obtain Tritium from the reactor itself. It is proposed the same type of reactor yet proposed by the author in a previous article, i.e. a Stellarator “racetrack” magnetic loop. The working of this reactor is continuous. It is reminded that the Deuterium is relatively abundant on the sea water, and so it constitutes an almost inexhaustible source of energy. Thanks to secondary fusions (D-T and D-He3) which both occur at an appreciable level above 100 keV, plasma can stabilize around such high equilibrium energy (i.e. between 100 and 150 keV). The mechanical gain (Q) of such reactor increases with the internal pipe radius, up to 4.5 m. A radius of 4.5 m permits a mechanical gain (Q) of about 17 which thanks to a modern thermo-dynamical conversion would lead to convert about 21% of the thermal power issued from the D-D reactor in a net electric power of 20 GWe. The goal of the article is to create a physical model of the D-D reactor so as to estimate this one without the need of a simulator and finally to estimate the dimensions, power and yield of such D-D reactor for different net electrical powers. The difficulties of the modeling of such reactor are listed in this article and would certainly be applicable to a future D-He3 reactor, if any.

References

[1]  (2022) bp Statistical Review of World Energy. 71st Edition.
https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf
[2]  Lindecker, P. (2022) Progressive Thermalization Fusion Reactor Able to Produce Nuclear Fusions at Higher Mechanical Gain. Energy and Power Engineering, 14, 35-100.
https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2022.141003
[3]  Guidini, J. (1962) Mesure des sections efficaces d’échange de charge et de dissociation des ions H+2 dans une large gamme d’énergie (25 - 250 keV). Rapport CEA n˚2135-1962.
[4]  Rax, J.-M. (2011) Physique des tokamaks. Editions de l’Ecole Polytechnique.
[5]  IAEA Library. ENDF/B-VIII.0 Sub-Library:[D], Incident-Deuteron Data, Materials:5 1-H-2 LANL EVAL-SEP01 G.M.HALE MT50 Table.
https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/servlet/E4sGetSect?SectID=8937861&req=14246
[6]  IAEA Library. ENDF/B-VIII.0 Sub-Library:[D], Incident-Deuteron Data, Materials:5 1-H-2 LANL EVAL-SEP01 G.M.HALE MT600 Table.
https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/servlet/E4sGetSect?SectID=8937860&req=15881
[7]  IAEA Library. ENDF/B-VIII.0 Sub-Library:[D], Incident-Deuteron Data, Materials:5 1-H-3 LANL EVAL-JAN95 G.M.HALE AND M.DROSG MT50 Table.
https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/servlet/E4sGetSect?SectID=8937867&req=14247
[8]  IAEA Library. ENDF/B-VIII.0 Sub-Library:[D], Incident-Deuteron Data, Materials:5 2-He-3 LANL EVAL-FEB01 G.M.HALE MT600 Table.
https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/servlet/E4sGetSect?SectID=8937874&req=14248
[9]  McNally Jr., J.R. (1979) Fusion Reactivity Graphs and Tables for Charged Particle Reactions. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
https://doi.org/10.2172/5992170
[10]  Majeed, R.H. and Oudah, O.N. (2018) Achieving an Optimum Slowing-Down Energy Distribution Functions and Corresponding Reaction Rates for the (D+3He and T+3He) Fusion Reactions. AIP Conference Proceedings, Beirut, 1-3 February 2018, Article 030048.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039235
[11]  Moisan, M. and Pelletier, J. (2014) Plasmas Collisionnels. EDP Sciences.
[12]  Rider, T.H. (1995) A General Critique of Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement Fusion Systems. Physics of Plasmas, 2, 1853-1872.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871273
[13]  Bobin, J.-L. (2011) La fusion thermonucléaire controlee. EDP Sciences.
[14]  Beidler, C.D., et al. (2001) The Helias Reactor. Nuclear Fusion, 41, 1759.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/41/12/303
[15]  Murari, A., Peluso, E., Spolladore, L., Vega, J. and Gelfusa, M. (2022) Considerations on Stellarator’s Optimization from the Perspective of the Energy Confinement Time Scaling Laws. Applied Sciences, 12, Article 2862.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062862
[16]  Fuchert, G., Beurskens, M.N.A., Bozhenkov, S., Warmer, F., Brunner, K.J., Dinklage, A., Hacker, P., Hirsch, M., Knauer, J., Langenberg, A., Pasch, E., Rahbarnia, K., Zhang, D. and Wolf, R.C. (2020) Energy Confinement in W7-X, More Than just a Scaling Law. Preprint 1334 (IAEA-EX/P6-16).
[17]  Beidler, C., et al. (2021) Demonstration of Reduced Neoclassical Energy Transport in Wendelstein 7-X. Nature, 596, 221-226.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03687-w
[18]  Miyamoto, K. (1980) Plasma Physics for Nuclear Fusion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914166
[19]  Sheffield, J. and Spong, D.A. (2016) Catalyzed D-D Stellarator Reactor. Fusion Science and Technology, 70, 36-53.
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1261560
[20]  Chéron, B. (2001) Théorie cinétique—Gaz et plasmas. Ellipses.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133