|
假冒注册商标罪中“同一种商品”的认定难点与破解
|
Abstract:
随着市场经济的飞速发展,在以市场经济为主导的当下,商标犯罪案件日益增长,通过对比商标犯罪在商标侵权中的相同因素。对商标犯罪的特色问题“同一种商品”进行了讨论并将“同一种商品”在学术上的争议并与“包含叫法不同实质相同事物”进行对比。面对“包含叫法不同实质相同事物”问题时,商标犯罪的概念判定上首先应该坚持查看对照分类表是否有详细的区分,其次出现实质相同名称不同的情况,根据相关公众是否认为属于同一种商品进行判别,最后对于“名称不同但本质是更高的概念”,根据已经更新分类表相关分类,要根据最新司法解释和实际情况进行判别。
With the rapid development of the market economy, there is no doubt about the importance of intellectual property rights for enterprises. In the era dominated by market economy, the cases of trademark crime are increasing, by comparing the same factors of trademark crime in trademark infringement. The characteristic problem of trademark crime “the same goods” is discussed. The academic controversy over “the same kind of goods” is introduced and compared with “the same thing with different names”. As for the specific issue of “containing things with different names and essentially the same thing”, the conceptual determination of trademark crime should be insisted on first checking whether there is a detailed distinction against the classification table, and then determining it according to the actual situation, and for the issue of “different names but essentially higher concepts”, it should be determined according to the actual situation should be determined according to the actual situation.
[1] | 张嘉伟. 假冒注册商标罪的司法适用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学, 2023. |
[2] | 孙国祥, 魏昌东. 经济刑法研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005. |
[3] | 高艳军, 南振兴. 浅析反向假冒行为[J]. 黑龙江对外经贸, 2009(7): 109-110+130. |
[4] | 孔祥俊. 知识产权法律适用的基本问题——司法哲学、司法政策与裁判方法[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2013. |
[5] | 黄丽勤, 周铭川. 假冒注册商标罪认定中的若干问题研究[J]. 湖南警察学院学报, 2006(1): 76-80. |
[6] | 王作富. 刑法分则实务研究[M]. 北京: 中国方正出版社, 2007. |
[7] | 柏浪涛. 侵犯知识产权罪研究[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2011. |
[8] | 赵秉志. 侵犯知识产权犯罪研究[M]. 北京: 中国方正出版社, 1999. |
[9] | 凌宗亮. 销售假冒注册商标的商品罪中“同一种商品”的认定——析谬银华销售假冒注册商标的商品案[J]. 中华商标, 2014(1): 77-81. |
[10] | 吴晨溪. 销售假冒注册商标的商品罪司法适用问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北方工业大学, 2023. |
[11] | 程赟. 网销假冒注册商标的商品违法行为认定探析[J]. 现代企业, 2023(5): 136-138. |