|
Aging Research 2023
生育补贴政策与生育率变化:理论推演与数值模拟
|
Abstract:
人口老龄化是社会发展过程中不可忽视的问题,也是我国的基本国情,近年来,政府部门和学术界越来越关注老龄化进程加速、生育率低迷引起的问题。本文通过构建一个内生化生育率的三期OLG模型,从理论模型和数值模拟两方面出发,分析生育补贴政策对生育率和家庭照料的影响。研究发现:第一,生育补贴政策对生育率和人力资本水平具有显著的促进作用,但对社会总劳动供给的影响不确定;第二,生育补贴政策可以缓解家庭老年赡养压力,但同时也会加重家庭的少年抚养压力;第三,人口老龄化、老年义务赡养压力的增加会抑制人力资本的发展。据此,我国应该坚持放松性生育政策不动摇,加快构建生育支持政策体系,制定更加清晰明确的生育补贴政策,同时注重家庭养老问题,实施科教兴国战略,以积极应对人口老龄化带来的负面冲击。
The aging population is an issue that cannot be ignored in the process of social development, and it is also the basic national condition of China. In recent years, government departments and academic circles have paid more and more attention to the problems caused by the accelerated aging process and low fertility rate. This article builds a three-period OLG model of endogenized fertility and analyzes the impact of fertility subsidy policies on fertility and family care from both theoretical models and numerical simulations. The study found that: First, the maternity subsidy policy has a significant promoting effect on the fertility rate and human capital level, but its impact on the total social labor supply is uncertain; Second, the maternity subsidy policy can alleviate the pressure of elderly support for families, but at the same time, it will also increase the pressure of juvenile support for families; Thirdly, the aging of the population and the increase in the pressure of obligatory support for the elderly will inhibit the development of human capital. Accordingly, China should persist in relaxing its fertility policy, accelerate the construction of a fertility support policy system, formulate a clearer fertility subsidy policy, pay attention to family care issues, and implement the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education to actively respond to the negative consequences of population aging impact.
[1] | 陆旸, 蔡昉. 调整人口政策对中国长期潜在增长率的影响[J]. 劳动经济研究, 2013(1): 35-50. |
[2] | 汪伟. 人口老龄化、生育政策调整与中国经济增长[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016(4): 67-96. |
[3] | 杨建芳, 龚六堂, 张庆华. 人力资本形成及其对经济增长的影响——一个包含教育和健康投入的内生增长模型及其检验[J]. 管理世界, 2006(5): 10-18, 34, 171. |
[4] | 严成樑. 延迟退休、内生出生率与经济增长[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11): 28-43. |
[5] | 彭海艳, 程北南. 生育激励与个人所得税——理论逻辑与经验论据[J]. 人口与经济, 2021(2): 1-12. |
[6] | 郑录军, 韩庆潇. 生育政策、人口流动对宏观经济的影响[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2022, 32(8): 163-173. |
[7] | Muto, I., Oda, T. and Sudo, N. (2016) Macroeconomic Impact of Population Aging in Japan: A Perspective from an Overlapping Generations Model. IMF Economic Review, 64, 408-442. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2016.6 |
[8] | Aisa, R. and Pueyo, F. (2013) Population Aging, Health Care, and Growth: A Comment on the Effects of Capital Accumulation. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1285-1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0448-2 |
[9] | Li, H., Zhang, J. and Zhang, J. (2007) Effects of Longevity and Dependency Rates on Saving and Growth: Evidence from a Panel of Cross Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 84, 138-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.10.002 |
[10] | Zhang, J., Zhang, J.S. and Lee, R. (2003) Rising Longevity, Education, Savings, and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 70, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00088-3 |
[11] | Zhang, J. and Zhang, J. (2005) The Effect of Life Expectancy on Fertility, Saving, Schooling and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107, 45-66.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00394.x |
[12] | Petrucci, A. (2015) Optimal Income Taxation in Models with Endogenous Fertility. Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.12.001 |
[13] | Fanti, L, and Gori, L. (2012) Economic Growth and Stability with Public Pay-as-You-Go Pensions and Private Intra-Family Old-Age Insurance. Research in Economics, 6, 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2012.04.003 |
[14] | 龙朝阳, 阳义南. 家庭代际扶持、意愿缴费率与养老金支柱设计[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2022(5): 77-88. |
[15] | 刘润芳, 车延. 延迟退休决策对居民家庭代际收入流动性的影响分析——基于人力资本传递机制[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2022(5): 92-101. |
[16] | 曹信邦, 张静. 人口老龄化、生育政策调整与企业年金最优缴费率[J]. 财政科学, 2022(6): 127-140. |
[17] | 于也雯, 龚六堂. 生育政策、生育率与家庭养老[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(5): 38-56. |
[18] | 严成樑. 延迟退休、隔代教养与人口出生率[J]. 世界经济, 2018, 41(6): 152-172. |
[19] | 郭凯明, 颜色. 生育率选择、不平等与中等收入陷阱[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017, 16(3): 921-940. |
[20] | Qin, X., Wang, T. and Zhuang, C.C. (2016) International Transfer of Human Capital and Its Impaction Income Mobility: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 38, 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.10.005 |
[21] | 沈忻昕, 张镇. 生育补贴、养老金支付与生育率变动[J]. 地方财政研究, 2022(9): 92-103. |
[22] | 郭凯明, 余靖雯, 龚六堂. 退休年龄、隔代抚养与经济增长[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2021, 21(2): 493-510. |
[23] | 贾俊雪, 龙学文, 孙伟. 人口红利还是人力资本红利: 生育政策经济影响的理论分析[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(12): 130-148. |
[24] | 王小鲁, 樊纲. 中国经济增长的可持续性——跨世纪的回顾与展望[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2000. |
[25] | 张军. 资本形成、工业化与经济增长: 中国的转轨特征[J]. 经济研究, 2002(6): 3-13, 93. |