全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“成都大运会”外宣新闻语篇的介入性分析
A Discourse Analysis of “Chengdu 2021 FISU World University Games” English Official Re-lease Based on Engagement System

DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.1111679, PP. 5056-5064

Keywords: 介入,成都大运会,文本分析
Engagement
, Chengdu 2021 FISU World University Games, Discourse Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文以评价理论下介入系统为理论基础,搜集整理“成都大运会”官网外宣新闻语料,运用Antconc 4.2.0语料库检索工具和人工标注结合的方式,研究分析其语料的介入资源分布和话语特点,以此更好地指导未来外宣新闻语篇中互动模式的构建。研究发现,多声资源占比83.62%,其中以“承认”资源为主,占比达到56.92%,说明语篇呈现多声性丰富的特点。作者对“承认”资源的运用,使文章更具实时性,增强了文章的说服力,构建了多话语多立场的动态互动对话模式,体现了“成都大运会”新闻重视多方互动和开放包容的话语特点。
Based on the Engagement System under the Appraisal Theory, this paper collected and collated the English official release of “Chengdu 2021 FISU World University Games” to better guide the interac-tive mode of the future English official release. The study used Antconc 4.2.0 corpus retrieval tool and manual annotation to analyze the distribution of Engagement Resources and discourse charac-teristics of the corpus. The paper found that the proportion of Heterogloss Resources covers 83.62%, and the proportion of acknowledgement resources is 56.92%, indicating that the discourse is char-acterized by richness of multi-sound. The use of Acknowledgement Resources makes the articles more real-time, enhances the persuasiveness of the articles, and builds a dynamic interactive dia-logue model with multiple conversations and multiple positions, which embodies the discourse characteristics that “Chengdu 2021 FISU World University Games” English official release values in-clusiveness of multiple interaction.

References

[1]  王振华, 马玉蕾. 评价理论: 魅力与困惑[J]. 外语教学, 2007, 28(6): 19-23
[2]  Martin, J.R. (2000) Beyond Ex-change: Appraisal System in English. In Hunston, S. and Thompson, G., Eds., Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford, 142-175.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008
[3]  Voloshinov, V.N. (1995) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, Bakhtinian Thought—An Introductory Reader. Routledge, London.
[4]  Martin, J.R., and White, P.R.R. (2005) The Evaluation of Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
[5]  王振华. 评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J]. 外国语, 2001(6): 13-20.
[6]  王振华, 路洋. “介入系统”嬗变[J]. 外语学刊, 2010(3): 51-56.
[7]  王振华. 语言的功能维度——“评价理论”: 研究与应用主持人话语[J]. 外语学刊, 2010(3): 55-63.
[8]  胡潇元, 范瑜. 介入系统视角下“文化润疆”新闻语篇的话语分析[J]. 语言与翻译, 2022(4): 43-48.
[9]  蒋国东, 陈许. 对外新闻中的“一带一路”——评价理论介入系统下的话语分析[J]. 外语研究, 2017, 35(5): 6-9.
[10]  刘承宇, 赵常友. 监狱话语中的介入系统及其教育改造效能研究[J]. 外语教学, 2023, 44(2): 30-36.
[11]  赖良涛, 苏树苗. 从介入系统看文学史话语的对话性[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(2): 127-136.
[12]  李晓雪, 黄滔. 特朗普与希拉里总统竞选电视辩论中介入资源的人际意义对比分析[J]. 语言教育, 2018(1): 45-51.
[13]  刘婷婷, 徐加新. 英汉政治社论语篇介入资源对比研究——评价理论视域下的新闻语篇分析[J]. 外语与翻译, 2018, 25(3): 45-51.
[14]  刘世生, 刘立华. 评价研究视角下的话语分析[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 27(2): 134-141+160.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133