全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

行政争议诉前调解作为非诉解纷机制的困境与优化
The Dilemma and Optimization of Pre-Litigation Mediation of Administrative Disputes as a Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution Mechanism

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116910, PP. 6336-6344

Keywords: 诉前调解,非诉讼纠纷解决机制,行政争议,实质性化解
Pre-Litigation Mediation
, Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Administrative Disputes, Substantive Resolution

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

诉前调解,将诉讼调解程序提前到了诉讼开始之前,是非诉讼纠纷解决机制的组成部分;行政争议诉前调解,是在当事人对行政争议提起行政诉讼、行政复议或产生行政争议时,当事人向行政争议调解中心申请调解,行政争议调解中心就该行政争议进行诉前协调。本文以行政争议诉前调解兴起的时代背景、我国立法现状与实践运行为起点,通过行政争议诉前调解的功能定位分析该制度的理论价值,探索该制度在实践运行中存在的理论争议与现实困境。目前,行政争议诉前调解在实践中存在立法规定不统一、调解协议的司法确认程序不健全、调解协议的法律效力不明确等困境。应加快完善行政争议诉前调解统一的立法规定,优化行政争议诉前调解协议的司法确认程序,明确行政争议诉前调解协议的法律效力,实质性化解行政争议在行政诉讼前。
Pre-litigation mediation, which advances the litigation mediation process to the beginning of litiga-tion, is an integral part of the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism; the pre-litigation mediation of administrative disputes is that when the parties file administrative litigation, administrative reconsideration or administrative disputes on administrative disputes, the parties apply to the administrative dispute mediation center for mediation, and the administrative dispute mediation center coordinates the administrative dispute before litigation. Based on the background of the rise of pre-litigation mediation of administrative disputes, the current situation of legislation and practical operation in China, this paper analyzes the theoretical value of the system through the func-tional orientation of pre-litigation mediation of administrative disputes, and explores the theoretical disputes and practical difficulties existing in the practical operation of the system. At present, there are some difficulties in the practice of pre-litigation mediation of administrative disputes, such as inconsistent legislative provisions, imperfect judicial confirmation procedures of mediation agreements, and unclear legal effect of mediation agreements. We should speed up the improvement of the unified legislative provisions on the pre-litigation mediation of administrative disputes, optimize the judicial confirmation process of the pre-litigation mediation agreement of administrative disputes, clarify the legal effect of the pre-litigation mediation agreement of administrative disputes, and substantively resolve administrative disputes before administrative litigation.

References

[1]  (澳)娜嘉?亚历山大. 全球调解趋势[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2011: 114.
[2]  范愉. 非诉讼纠纷解决机制研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2000: 11.
[3]  (日)棚濑孝雄. 纠纷解决与审判制度[M]. 王亚新, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004.
[4]  左卫民. 通过诉前调解控制“诉讼爆炸”——区域经验的实证研究[J]. 清华法学, 2020, 14(4): 89-106.
[5]  章剑生. 行政诉讼“解决行政争议”的限定及其规则——基于《行政诉讼法》第1条展开的分析[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2020, 23(4): 93-104.
[6]  范愉. 纠纷解决的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2007: 435.
[7]  梁凤云, 陈默. 行政争议诉前调解的功能定位和制度设想[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(2): 112-124.
[8]  王聪. 作为诉源治理机制的行政调解: 价值重塑与路径优化[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021(5): 55-66.
[9]  孙国华. 安吉行政争议也能“大调解” [N]. 人民法院报, 2017-12-03(8).
[10]  钱祎. 行政争议, 化解在萌芽状态[N]. 浙江日报, 2020-11-19(8).
[11]  郭彦. 共建共赢内外并举全面深入推进诉源治理[N]. 人民法院报, 2016-12-28(008).
[12]  高鸿. 行政行为自我纠正的制度构建[J]. 中国法律评论, 2021, 39(3): 62-68.
[13]  王万华. 行政复议法的修改与完善——以“实质性解决行政争议”为视角[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(5): 99-117.
[14]  葛晓燕. 诉源治理视阈下行政诉权有效行使保障的司法进路——基于程序性驳回案件的实证考察[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(1): 24-35.
[15]  刘群. 实质解决行政争议视角下的行政履行判决适用研究[J]. 行政法学研究, 2019(2): 126-135.
[16]  章志远. 行政争议实质性解决的法理解读[J]. 中国法学, 2020(6): 122-141.
[17]  杨伟东. 权力结构中的行政诉讼[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[18]  黄忠顺. 调解的共通性效力[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2014, 22(3): 136-147.
[19]  范愉. 行政调解问题刍议[J]. 广东社会科学, 2008(6): 174-184.
[20]  邓佑文. 行政复议调解的现实困境、功能定位与制度优化[J]. 中国行政管理, 2023(1): 29-35.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133