|
监察对象与犯罪主体的衔接问题研究
|
Abstract:
自2018年《监察法》出台,监察委员会的成立、监察机构的设立,标志着我国监察体系的建立,保障了国家公权力运行的公正、廉洁。但《监察法》与《刑法》的衔接存在一定的问题,其中之一就是监察对象范围与《刑法》犯罪主体的内容衔接存在一定的问题,如两者的认定范围存在差异、《监察法》中对单位立法的缺失,以及监察人员的刑事归责等问题使得法法衔接困难。应当采用修订《监察法》与《刑法》中关于“国家机关”和“国家工作人员”的内容,完善监察人员的归责制度和增加单位为监察主体的方式解决问题,保证两者的协调运行,发挥出反腐败治理的最大合力。
Since the promulgation of the Supervision Law in 2018, the establishment of supervisory commissions and the establishment of supervisory organs mark the construction of China’s supervisory system and ensure the fairness and integrity of the operation of state public power. However, the cohesion between Supervision Law and Criminal Law has certain problems, one of which is the supervisory object scope and the content of the Criminal Law crime subject cohesion have certain problems, such as the difference in the identification scope of the two, the lack of unit legislation in the Supervision Law, and the criminal responsibility of the supervisors make the connection between the law and the law difficult. We should adopt the contents of “state organs” and “state personnel” in the revision of the Supervision Law and Criminal Law, improve the accountability system of supervisors and add the units as the supervisory subjects to solve the problem, so as to ensure the coordinated operation of the two and give full play to the maximum joint force of anti-corruption governance.
[1] | 袁柏顺. 范围、界限与动态发展: 也论监察对象“全覆盖” [J]. 河南社会科学, 2019, 27(1): 8-13. |
[2] | 夏金莱. 论监察全覆盖下的监察对象[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2021, 82(2): 240-250. |
[3] | 钱小平. 法秩序统一性视野下监察对象的体系解释[J]. 当代法学, 2023, 37(1): 83-94. |
[4] | 谭波. 论《监察法》中的“有关人员”——基于党和国家监督体系的统合需求[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(5): 122-135. |
[5] | 喻少如, 龙嘉. 《监察法》与《刑法》的衔接机制研究[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2022, 24(4): 91-100. |
[6] | 梁知博. 职务犯罪主体视阈下“监察对象”界定的缺陷与完善——基于《监察法》与《刑法》衔接的视角[J]. 理论导刊, 2019(3): 103-107. |
[7] | 马怀德. 国家监察体制改革的重要意义和主要任务[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2016(6): 15-21+125. |
[8] | 陈伟. 监察法与刑法的衔接协调与规范运行[J]. 中外法学, 2019, 31(2): 334-356. |
[9] | 李翔. 论《监察法》实施对刑事实体法的影响及完善[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 21(1): 97-103+144. |
[10] | 周乐军. “对人监察”抑或“对事监察”——论我国监察委员会监察权的边界[J]. 时代法学, 2018, 16(4): 50-58. |