全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

独立董事制度发展与优化——从康美药业案出发
Development and Optimization of the Independent Director System—Starting from the Kangmei Pharmaceutical Case

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116891, PP. 6217-6222

Keywords: 独立董事,康美药业,赔偿责任
Independent Director
, Kangmei Pharmaceutical, Liability for Compensation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

独立董事制度与其他众多制度一样都是为了上市公司能够更好地发展而生,在实践中大多数情况下却形同虚设,在康美药业暴雷后,众多独立董事纷纷辞职。其中暴露出来独立董事制度存在包括独立董事需要完成超过其能力范围的事项、薪资收入和责任不匹配,考量独立董事是否尽到忠实勤勉义务的分析标准存在不完善之处在内的一些问题。从独立董事的定位和义务出发,探究其中影响问题的关键因素。根据这些关键因素对症下药,提出完善独立董事体系的建议,通过完善独立董事的评估制度,分配好独立董事和其他高管的权力义务,探索独立董事的市场化、职业化发展机制,细化完善独立董事的赔偿机制等方式促进提升独立董事的履职效能,优化独立董事制度。
The independent director system, like many other systems, is designed for the better development of listed companies. However, in practice, it is mostly non-existent. After the outbreak of the Kangmei Pharmaceutical industry, many independent directors have resigned one after another. Among them, it has been exposed that there are some problems in the independent director system, including the need for independent directors to complete tasks beyond their ability, mismatched salary income and responsibilities, and imperfect analytical standards for considering whether in-dependent directors have fulfilled their duties of loyalty and diligence. Starting from the positioning and obligations of independent directors, we explore the key factors that affect the problem. Based on these key factors, propose suggestions to improve the independent director system, improve the evaluation system of independent directors, allocate the rights and obligations of independent directors and other executives, explore the market-oriented and professional development mechanism of independent directors, refine and improve the compensation mechanism of independent directors, and promote the improvement of the performance efficiency of independent directors and optimize the independent director system.

References

[1]  戴文涛, 刘秀梅, 曲京山. 我国上市公司的独立董事制度有作用吗?——基于一个外生政策冲击的检验[J]. 财经问题研究, 2018(11): 59-65.
[2]  李润泽. 论公司治理结构下独立董事制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2023.
[3]  高明华. 完善我国独立董事制度[J]. 中国金融, 2022(5): 85-87.
[4]  刘俊海. 上市公司独立董事制度的反思和重构——康美药业案中独董巨额连带赔偿责任的法律思考[J]. 法学杂志, 2022, 43(3): 1-27.
[5]  我国独立董事的制度悖论、缺陷与解决途径——对“康美药业案”引发的独立董事辞职潮的思考[J]. 学术论坛, 2022, 45(1): 61-73.
[6]  王曙光, 董洁. 康美药业财务舞弊案例分析——基于审计失败的视角[J]. 财会通讯, 2020, 859(23): 116-120.
[7]  汪青松, 罗娜. 独董独立性谜题与机制独立性再造[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(3): 43-51.
[8]  陆静, 张莹, 向诚. 独立董事制度对公司违规行为的影响——来自中国A股市场的经验证据[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(5): 102-120.
[9]  杨晨. 论上市公司独立董事的勤勉义务[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2023.
[10]  金婷. 独立董事的责任边界与问责路径[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2022.
[11]  张晓明, 李辉, 李辽宁. 建设市场化的独立董事选聘机制探索[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 21(1): 30-33.
[12]  何振强. 增强独立董事独立性——独立董事选聘机制研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(8): 130+132.
[13]  冷静. 康美启示: 证券集团诉讼首案的制度突破与未尽议题[J]. 中国法律评论, 2022, 43(1): 78-92.
[14]  李志刚, 邹宇, 叶林, 等. 证券虚假陈述纠纷中独立董事的赔偿责任: 案例、法理与制度完善[J]. 人民司法, 2022(1): 104-111.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133