全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

美国等同原则复兴的学术探讨、司法特征及启示
The Academic Context, Judicial Characteristics, and Inspiration of the Revival of the Doctrine of Equivalents in the United States

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.1211892, PP. 6521-6531

Keywords: 等同原则,司法实践,学术发展,制度比对
The Doctrine of Equivalents
, Judicial Practice, Academic Development, System Comparison

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了了解美国等同原则复兴的主要状况,从围绕等同原则所进行的学术交流入手,通过对文献的整理、阅读,明晰有关学术交流的发展历程,以及有关学术著作之间的网状连接关系,勾勒出本次等同原则复兴学术探讨的主要内容。其次通过对2020~2023年司法案例的统计、归纳,总结司法实践的最新特征,并用以验证有关研究成果的结论。最后在充分掌握了本次美国等同原则复兴的情况下,与中国司法实践进行比对,阐述对中国等同原则发展的启示。
In order to understand the main situation of the revival of the Doctrine of Equivalents in the United States, it starts with academic discussion around the Doctrine of Equivalents. Firstly, through the organization and reading of literature, the development process of academic discussion and the network connection relationship between academic works are clarified, Outlining the main content of the academic discussion on the revival of the Doctrine of Equivalents. Secondly, through the statistics and induction of judicial cases from 2020 to 2023, the latest characteristics of judicial practice are summarized and used to verify the conclusions of relevant research results. Finally, after fully grasping the situation of the revival of the Doctrine of Equivalents in the United States, a comparison was made with Chinese judicial practice to elaborate on the inspiration for the development of the Doctrine of Equivalents in China.

References

[1]  曹新明. 专利侵权等同原则适用研究[J]. 知识产权, 2023(2): 24-40.
[2]  Lim, D. (2020) Judging Equivalents. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 36, 223-280.
[3]  Allison, J.R. and Lemley, M.A. (2007) The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents. Stanford Law Review, 59, 955-984.
[4]  Lim, D. (2021) The (Unnoticed) Revitalization of the Doctrine of Equivalents. St. John’s Law Review, 94, 65-120.
[5]  Holman, C.M. (2021) Branded Drug Companies Are Successfully Asserting the Doctrine of Equivalents in Hatch- Waxman Litigation. Biotechnology Law Report 72.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4027544
[6]  Hansen, C.J. (2018) Virtually Equivalent: Applying the Doctrine of Equivalents to Patented Inventions Depicted in Virtual Reality. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 46, 231.
[7]  林秀芹, 刘运华. 专利权经济价值的界定[J]. 厦门大学法律评论, 2014(1): 19-31.
[8]  威廉?兰德斯, 理查德?波斯纳. 知识产权法的经济结构[M]. 金海军, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 334.
[9]  Lemley, M.A. and Simcoe, T. (2019) How Essential Are Standard-Essential Patents? Cornell Law Review, 104, 607-642.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128420
[10]  刘紫微. 专利禁止反悔原则适用范围的再思考[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2023, 26(4): 178-192.
[11]  卢梭. 社会契约论[M]. 戴光年, 译. 武汉: 武汉出版社, 2012: 117.
[12]  王晨. 扎实开展法学研究, 积极服务法治实践, 为推进中国式现代化提供有力法治保障[J]. 民主与法制周刊, 2023(17): 14.
[13]  崔国斌. 专利法原理与案例[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 580.
[14]  彭树远, 吴杰, 孙权, 才华. 我国专利价值提升途径探析[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2022, 19(9): 63-69.
[15]  刘夏. 专利审查的经济分析: 效率、质量与机制设计[J]. 知识产权, 2022(2): 33-48.
[16]  崔峥, 张鹏. 《专利法》第33条的立法本意与法律适用探析——以先申请原则和禁止反悔原则为支点[J]. 知识产权, 2011(4): 27-32.
[17]  孔祥俊. 中国知识产权保护的创新和升级[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014: 89.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133