预备行为实行化的立法分析
Legislative Analysis of Implementation of Preparatory Acts

为适应当前社会犯罪手段复杂化、隐蔽化的趋势，出于预防刑法理念，预备行为实行化这种立法模式不断适用，虽然一定程度上通过前置刑法介入时间对犯罪行为进行预防性制裁，但是单独立法可能无限制地扩大刑法规制的范围，对公民的基本权利造成损害。预备行为实行化立法对于罪名规定抽象化、非类型化，对入罪的重大法益标准不够统一，介入时“抽象危险”定义不清，应当引入比例原则，将预备行为予以类型化，从质和量两方面判断重大法益，从行为人的主客观确立介入时机，以此完善预备行为实行化的立法模式。
In order to adapt to the trend of complicated and concealed criminal means in the current society, the legislative mode of the implementation of preparatory acts is constantly applied out of the concept of preventive criminal law. Although preventive sanctions on criminal acts are carried out through pre-emptive criminal law intervention time to a certain extent, separate legislation may expand the scope of criminal law regulation without limitation and cause damage to the basic rights of citizens. The legislation of the implementation of preparatory acts is abstract and non-typed in the provisions of charges, not uniform in the standards of major legal interests of crimes, and unclear in the definition of “abstract danger” in the intervention. The principle of proportion should be introduced to type preparatory acts, judge major legal interests from both qualitative and quantitative aspects, and establish the opportunity for intervention from the subjective and objective of the perpetrator, so as to improve the legislative model of the implementation of preparatory acts.