全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

集体商标“莆田鞋”之法律正负效应的并存
The Co-Existence of Legal Positive and Negative Effects of Collective Trademark “Putian Shoes”

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116814, PP. 5701-5705

Keywords: 莆田鞋,集体商标,正负效应,法律调整
Putian Shoes
, Collective Trademark, Positive and Negative Effects, Legal Adjustment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着福建莆田的鞋类产业一点点发展至今日,制鞋技术与工艺、代加工生产也越发成熟,伴随着的也是越来越多仿制正品鞋生产销售的不正当竞争行为。为了规制制假售假以及使莆田鞋企的转成正规,在2022年,莆田鞋业协会即宣布了“莆田鞋”集体商标获得了国家知识产权局批准注册。本论文从法律视角探讨了集体商标“莆田鞋”的正负效应,并提出了相应的法律调整与管理措施。正面效应涵盖品牌认知度提升、质量控制与消费者权益保护等,但负面效应如虚假宣传、负面声誉与消费者权益损害需要规制。法律应完善集体商标制度、强化管理组织角色,加强法律执行、激励诚信经营,提升知识产权培训与宣传,以实现正负效应的平衡,维护市场秩序和消费者权益。
With the development of the shoe industry in Putian, Fujian province, the shoe technology and production are becoming more and more mature, accompanied by more and more unfair competition in the production and sales of genuine shoes. In order to regulate the production and sale of counterfeit goods and normalize the transformation of Putian shoe enterprises, the Putian Shoes Association announced in 2022 that the collective trademark of “Putian Shoes” was approved and registered by the State Intellectual Property Office. This paper discusses the positive and negative effects of the collective trademark “Putian shoes” from the legal perspective, and puts forward the corresponding legal adjustment and management measures. Positive effects cover the improvement of brand awareness, quality control and protection of consumer rights and interests, but negative effects such as false publicity, negative reputation and damage to consumer rights and interests need to be regulated. The law should improve the collective trademark system, strengthen the role of management organization, strengthen law enforcement, encourage honest management, enhance intellectual property training and publicity, so as to achieve a balance of positive and negative effects, and maintain market order and consumer rights and interests.

References

[1]  冯昭. “莆田鞋”的自我救赎[J]. 中国品牌, 2022, 179(5): 36-43.
[2]  赵旭. 商标性使用作为商标侵权前提的反思[J]. 知识产权, 2021(9): 56-78.
[3]  刘青青, 石丹. 注册集体商标, “莆田鞋”可否上岸[J]. 商学院, 2022(5): 98-102.
[4]  姜中介, 罗东. “莆田帮”: 假鞋横扫天下[J]. 21世纪商业评论, 2013(5): 48-53.
[5]  郑世一. 论商标侵权中混淆行为的认定——基于“茶颜悦色”一案分析[J]. 现代商业, 2021(12): 3-5.
[6]  邓雅蔓. 太二告太七、茶颜悦色诉茶颜观色企业商标侵权战频发伤了谁的钱包[J]. 中国经济周刊, 2021(9): 80-81.
[7]  张耕, 国赛. 民刑交叉视角下商标刑事保护边界研究[J]. 知识产权, 2020(12): 40-52.
[8]  王成. 福建莆田: “仿冒”鞋城的转型困境[J]. 西部皮革, 2013, 35(17): 7-9.
[9]  刘铁光. 商标侵权中“商标使用”的判定规则[J]. 法学杂志, 2021, 42(6): 11-22.
[10]  叶笑. 假冒证明商标、集体商标也可构成假冒注册商标罪[J]. 上海法学研究集刊, 2021(12): 140-146.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133